I disagree, Wise (with your last bit). We've already had some quit when the game crashed. Maybe they come back... maybe not. But I do not think it's a "hollow threat".
Those that DID build with the idea that this season WAS NOT a 'throw-away' season deserve to be allowed to keep going. BUT... only if there isn't some major change or disparity in the dots being built. Hate to add that caveat but it's necessary. Should changes to the overall process effect the final outcome to where there is great disparity then once those same "keep going" people get to the end they will either have to GREAT of an advantage... or the opposite and find themselves having spent all that time and flex only to have weak dots incapable of equal competition with those that did the reset. That would also cause some upset people at that point.
I suppose there should be some kind of room for both to happen. For those that built to reset at season 100 to still do so... and for those that built to keep going to still do so. Other than the possibility of dot creation disparity, I see no reason to not allow both to happen.
I would add this for Mauler (and those like him) though. Consider if accelerated dot starts are done and Rookie is no longer a thing. Then those that did the 'reset' will have the same level of dots as you next season (season 100) and, perhaps, even be in better situations due to so many doing the 'reset' thing. Would that change your perspective of "no reset"?