Warrior General Games

Let's hope this doesn't suck: http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2468971

Originally posted by Homage
Let's hope this doesn't suck: http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2468971

retire

Originally posted by Dadd
Originally posted by TrevJo

People making coverage LBs and not investing at all in Swat Ball makes no sense to me. I understand the frustration with the tree, but for 5 SP you could add +2 to an SA that is 1. Fundamental to his role, 2. Favored, 3. Increased by +22.5% by AEQ (not to mention 3rd Down Stopper). Seems like a no-brainer to me.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2201125&playoffs=0

Like that?

meh

no first step and no change direction = meh indeed

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2095519

S29 USAPro DMVP -> S30 WL backup b/cs of changes to blitzing:
Several seasons in WL prior, lots of silver trophies. Bridesmaid/bride kinda thing....


http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2251016

Lots of minor league trophies, pretty meh at higher levels as a semi-experimental PR/KR.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2096271

Entirely average to below average (with the exception of 2 seasons with We Kinda Care, Maybe)

Originally posted by jdbolick

The QB you were babbling about had a 72 rushing bar and only 85 passing bar, which means that it's not anything even close to a conventional passing build. It's also clear from watching replays that he wasn't built for passing, but instead has abundant speed. The point, which you have continuously missed, is that TTS still doesn't give enough of a bonus to be worthwhile on conventional passing builds. Now please stop disrupting this thread because you can't understand what is being discussed.

Look, I'm not saying my QB proves TTS can be used. I'm saying that your QB can't prove that it can't. You gave the bottom end of the spectrum, I gave a top-end, can't we try and find a middle-term that would be a good build to test TTS ? Jesus dude, you're thicker than a black hole...

EDIT: No, wait, you know what, forget this, pretend I didn't say anything. I don't want another pointless discussion. I'll remove myself from the thread, I've said what needed to be said.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by TrevJo

People making coverage LBs and not investing at all in Swat Ball makes no sense to me. I understand the frustration with the tree, but for 5 SP you could add +2 to an SA that is 1. Fundamental to his role, 2. Favored, 3. Increased by +22.5% by AEQ (not to mention 3rd Down Stopper). Seems like a no-brainer to me.
I doubt that the AEQ bonus is applied after everything else. I imagine that it affects the base score, after which you add SAs and such.



Originally posted by jdbolick
Regardless, the bonus from Swat Ball is flat and small. It's not worthless by any means, but neither is it necessary. As others have noted, investing in Swat Ball doesn't seem to make coverage LBs any better.

So you think Swat Ball makes coverage CBs better, but not coverage LBs?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2041577

Probably could have won a couple lolCasual gifs if Ezra wasn't Garts bitch.

Originally posted by Hagalaz
Look, I'm not saying my QB proves TTS can be used. I'm saying that your QB can't prove that it can't. You gave the bottom end of the spectrum, I gave a top-end, can't we try and find a middle-term that would be a good build to test TTS ? Jesus dude, you're thicker than a black hole...

EDIT: No, wait, you know what, forget this, pretend I didn't say anything. I don't want another pointless discussion. I'll remove myself from the thread, I've said what needed to be said.
Yeah, just stop posting. You came into this thread and shat it up because you couldn't follow along with what was being discussed and had to bring up your irrelevant QB that no one cares about. Again, the point was that TTS doesn't work well on a conventional passing build, not how good it might be for guys who are shitty at passing but built to break tackles.


Originally posted by TrevJo
So you think Swat Ball makes coverage CBs better, but not coverage LBs?
I don't think it makes any coverage defender substantially better.

Originally posted by Dpride59
retire

probs

No SDC on any of these cover LB's?

Originally posted by bhall43
No SDC on any of these cover LB's?

I had SDC on my old coverage guy.. CD was way better not to mention how better it was in every other facet of the game.

I have ZF simply because we were considering going all zone back when we made this squad. Still might?

Originally posted by jdbolick
Yeah, just stop posting. You came into this thread and shat it up because you couldn't follow along with what was being discussed and had to bring up your irrelevant QB that no one cares about. Again, the point was that TTS doesn't work well on a conventional passing build, not how good it might be for guys who are shitty at passing but built to break tackles.
Ok, I'll bite. Ignore my QB. How can I somehow try to raise your attention to whether or not a build that can make TTS work is possible AND a passer? All I was trying was to show you that. How can I do this ?

im a huge fan of SDC. Not so much of CD.

Originally posted by Hagalaz

Ok, I'll bite. Ignore my QB. How can I somehow try to raise your attention to whether or not a build that can make TTS work is possible AND a passer? All I was trying was to show you that. How can I do this ?


its irrelevant because that build would suck donkey balls.