Originally posted by jmarter
And what about this one? https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3045467
Loki. Definitely Loki.
And what about this one? https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3045467
Loki. Definitely Loki.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
GG Palookas.....yes your D is elite
Damn right it is.
But don't sell your D short either. I always sweat when we play KC. Good game!
GG Palookas.....yes your D is elite
Damn right it is.
But don't sell your D short either. I always sweat when we play KC. Good game!Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by xxflip
i love challenges, maybe i should try and stop Novus's offense, anyone hiring?
I know you can. You beat the Palookas with the Paladins a couple of times, if I remember right.
i love challenges, maybe i should try and stop Novus's offense, anyone hiring?
I know you can. You beat the Palookas with the Paladins a couple of times, if I remember right.
Last time anyone of my teams(BIA) played the Palookas was S77: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2990560.
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Originally posted by Mauler
Last time anyone of my teams(BIA) played the Palookas was S77: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2990560.
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3043752
Im sure Palookas could complete a screen pass in WL when they arrive
Last time anyone of my teams(BIA) played the Palookas was S77: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2990560.
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3043752
Im sure Palookas could complete a screen pass in WL when they arriveodg62
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Is this in response to my post about STs making the difference in our game with War Hammer, or is this about us being an all-running team? I need to know which particular fallacy I'm responding to. Thanks!
Little bit of both, and calling those two things fallacies is like saying the earth is round is a fallacy.
As far as abusing running, if u even attempt a counter argument, your just not honest and it's not even worth the time discussing, anyone who's played this game at all is aware of the abuseable aspects.
As far as the STs and what u said regarding that game you commented on, you could just say yeah, lil lucky the STs went our way, like most people do. To discount a really good game by another team because of STs in GLB? Tacky.
Is this in response to my post about STs making the difference in our game with War Hammer, or is this about us being an all-running team? I need to know which particular fallacy I'm responding to. Thanks!
Little bit of both, and calling those two things fallacies is like saying the earth is round is a fallacy.
As far as abusing running, if u even attempt a counter argument, your just not honest and it's not even worth the time discussing, anyone who's played this game at all is aware of the abuseable aspects.
As far as the STs and what u said regarding that game you commented on, you could just say yeah, lil lucky the STs went our way, like most people do. To discount a really good game by another team because of STs in GLB? Tacky.
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3043752
Im sure Palookas could complete a screen pass in WL when they arrive
You would be lucky if you could get one team in a WL Final let along two. How much effort do you think I put in that game when both my teams are playing for a WL Title anyway? You my friend are just another ahole that doesn't know crap about this game, but talks crap like they do.
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=3043752
Im sure Palookas could complete a screen pass in WL when they arriveYou would be lucky if you could get one team in a WL Final let along two. How much effort do you think I put in that game when both my teams are playing for a WL Title anyway? You my friend are just another ahole that doesn't know crap about this game, but talks crap like they do.
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
A hole? GTFO. You come in here to talk smack on Paloookas immediately after a monster rivalry win today. You are just butt hurt after my baby RB shredded up your WL elite coordinating skills yesterday Congrats you beat the Palookas likely 1200 skill point first crop a decade ago lolol. This is their 2nd run with modifications Im sure.
You don't think they will do anything in WL cool story bro. I think current WL is dog shit so your wins are trash! We will see when this league arrives won't we? blabbing about what we won't do until we arrive is just you looking for some justification that you are good or something.
Congrats you beat the Palookas likely 1200 skill point first crop a decade ago lolol. This is their 2nd run with modifications Im sure. You don't think they will do anything in WL cool story bro. I think current WL is dog shit so your wins are trash! We will see when this league arrives won't we? blabbing about what we won't do until we arrive is just you looking for some justification that you are good or something.
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Mauler, while you're down here, please explain how 4th St. won a WL title since WL is so scary
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Mauler is 3-2 in prep guys. he's not used to having 7+ teams firing at him He would run this league rrrrrrrright. too bad this was the one year his multis didn't make a batch or we would all be in trouble!
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Mauler just scared that Comets and Palookas loaded with .5 guys ahead of his OT who should be huge in SP value. tik tok my friend, we are coming if you don't rage quit b4
Novus
offline
offline
Hoo-boy, Playmakers, that's a bit aggro, isn't it?
Originally posted by Mauler
Last time anyone of my teams(BIA) played the Palookas was S77: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2990560.
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
I'm certainly not gonna argue with your accomplishments in GLB, Mauler; definitely more than I've done.
But the Palookas have a long history of proving people wrong. People told us in Rookie in S69 that we couldn't beat Brew Crew or win Gold; we did both. So then people switched to predicting that we'd have to gut by National Minors; we kept going. Then people switched to predicting we'd have to gut before Natty Pro; we kept going. Then people switched to predicting that we'd never win Gold in Natty Pro; we won gold in North America Pro. Since our dots were about to enter Decline, we turned down the promotion to WL and returned to Rookie. And so far on this ride back up, every season someone has predicted that we were just a season or two away from having to gut, and instead we look stronger every season and have won either League Gold or Tourney Gold every season since Rookie. So when people say we'll never succeed in WL, well... people so far don't have a very good track record of predicting what we can't do.
As for what will happen when we reach World League as a "one-trick pony," the all-running team Rush Hour got to the WL title game in S39, so, so much for the idea that one-trick ponies can't succeed in WL. I'm not saying we absolutely will; WL is where dreams go to die, and Palm Bay's first and only season in WL back in the 30s went very badly indeed. But our builds and gameplanning right now are definitely better they've ever been, so if Rush Hour can get to the WL title game, I think we have a chance of least making the playoffs. But we'll see.
Originally posted by Mauler
Last time anyone of my teams(BIA) played the Palookas was S77: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2990560.
BIA has been in the WL since S79 so that was either a Regional Pro or Pro game, probably Pro. I DC'ed a team for Disa that was a all running team and we might have lost one or two games on the way to the WL, but once we got there it was a different story as one trick ponies don't work in the WL!
I'm certainly not gonna argue with your accomplishments in GLB, Mauler; definitely more than I've done.
But the Palookas have a long history of proving people wrong. People told us in Rookie in S69 that we couldn't beat Brew Crew or win Gold; we did both. So then people switched to predicting that we'd have to gut by National Minors; we kept going. Then people switched to predicting we'd have to gut before Natty Pro; we kept going. Then people switched to predicting that we'd never win Gold in Natty Pro; we won gold in North America Pro. Since our dots were about to enter Decline, we turned down the promotion to WL and returned to Rookie. And so far on this ride back up, every season someone has predicted that we were just a season or two away from having to gut, and instead we look stronger every season and have won either League Gold or Tourney Gold every season since Rookie. So when people say we'll never succeed in WL, well... people so far don't have a very good track record of predicting what we can't do.
As for what will happen when we reach World League as a "one-trick pony," the all-running team Rush Hour got to the WL title game in S39, so, so much for the idea that one-trick ponies can't succeed in WL. I'm not saying we absolutely will; WL is where dreams go to die, and Palm Bay's first and only season in WL back in the 30s went very badly indeed. But our builds and gameplanning right now are definitely better they've ever been, so if Rush Hour can get to the WL title game, I think we have a chance of least making the playoffs. But we'll see.
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
he's like Stalingrad throwing out shit like i'm an ahole for pointing out that BIA had ZERO completions on 2 attempts and SWAT had like 10 passes off screens. ill stick to my belief that Swat is just a grown up Palookas anyways. They have nothing to prove but are down here unprovoked talking smack. so NO, not aggro CoroNovus
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by odg62
Little bit of both, and calling those two things fallacies is like saying the earth is round is a fallacy.
Sick burn, bro.
Originally posted by odg62
As far as abusing running, if u even attempt a counter argument, your just not honest and it's not even worth the time discussing, anyone who's played this game at all is aware of the abuseable aspects.
Y'know, after looking over the 84 previous all-running teams that have won World League, I think you're actually right: all-running teams are exploitive and unstoppable. I apologize, and I'll shut my team down tomorrow so that passing teams actually have a chance.
Oh, wait.
If all-running teams were truly as abusive and over-powered as you say they are, there'd be way more of them. In reality, I can count the all-running teams currently in GLB on my fingers and still have a few left over.
As I mentioned earlier, if you want to beat an all-running team like Palm Bay, you need 3 things: well-built dots, good scouting, and a defensive gameplan that actually takes into account that we're an all-running team. If you do those 3 things, it's really not that hard to hold us to 13 points, and quite a few teams have done precisely that. But if you bring bad dots, skip scouting us, and try to win with the same defense you use against all the other normal teams, we'll hang fiddy on ya. But for that matter, if you bring bad dots, bad scouting, and lazy gameplanning against ANY good team with a normal offense, they'll hang fiddy on ya too.
If you can't beat Palm Bay, then there's a list of teams way better than ours who will absolutely eat your lunch; it's called World League. Fix your team.
Originally posted by odg62
As far as the STs and what u said regarding that game you commented on, you could just say yeah, lil lucky the STs went our way, like most people do. To discount a really good game by another team because of STs in GLB? Tacky.
I didn't discount anything; War Hammer played a good game, and Loonzilla didn't get offended when I pointed out -- correctly -- that STs made the difference in that close game. Hell, if anything, Loonzilla discounted *our* performance when he called our win "lucky", but I was fine with that -- I just responded with my opinion, and he seemed fine with my response. It's Loonzilla's team; if he's not offended, why are you?
Little bit of both, and calling those two things fallacies is like saying the earth is round is a fallacy.
Sick burn, bro.
Originally posted by odg62
As far as abusing running, if u even attempt a counter argument, your just not honest and it's not even worth the time discussing, anyone who's played this game at all is aware of the abuseable aspects.
Y'know, after looking over the 84 previous all-running teams that have won World League, I think you're actually right: all-running teams are exploitive and unstoppable. I apologize, and I'll shut my team down tomorrow so that passing teams actually have a chance.
Oh, wait.
If all-running teams were truly as abusive and over-powered as you say they are, there'd be way more of them. In reality, I can count the all-running teams currently in GLB on my fingers and still have a few left over.
As I mentioned earlier, if you want to beat an all-running team like Palm Bay, you need 3 things: well-built dots, good scouting, and a defensive gameplan that actually takes into account that we're an all-running team. If you do those 3 things, it's really not that hard to hold us to 13 points, and quite a few teams have done precisely that. But if you bring bad dots, skip scouting us, and try to win with the same defense you use against all the other normal teams, we'll hang fiddy on ya. But for that matter, if you bring bad dots, bad scouting, and lazy gameplanning against ANY good team with a normal offense, they'll hang fiddy on ya too.
If you can't beat Palm Bay, then there's a list of teams way better than ours who will absolutely eat your lunch; it's called World League. Fix your team.
Originally posted by odg62
As far as the STs and what u said regarding that game you commented on, you could just say yeah, lil lucky the STs went our way, like most people do. To discount a really good game by another team because of STs in GLB? Tacky.
I didn't discount anything; War Hammer played a good game, and Loonzilla didn't get offended when I pointed out -- correctly -- that STs made the difference in that close game. Hell, if anything, Loonzilla discounted *our* performance when he called our win "lucky", but I was fine with that -- I just responded with my opinion, and he seemed fine with my response. It's Loonzilla's team; if he's not offended, why are you?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
