Warrior General Games

Originally posted by David Stern
Since I already started my guy. I have the intent of going 5:1 agi 7:1 str, 49 catch vis jump stam conf, and speed 10:1, and train speed stam till the end of time. figured he wouldnt need much vis catch on those 5 yard routes thought 49 be enough. time will tell

I'm hoping mine is eventually able to run the FB long routes. Time will tell.

Would you keep this SS?
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1692075

I was planning to do an high vision build... but i'm tired of this rerolling bullshit

Originally posted by Ahrens858
and i am about to hit roll number 2000

LOL! Last season I had three machines each with four tabs open rolling, and several of those would break 100K rolls before timing out. So yes, I'm pounding those servers, but I assume Bort doesn't mind since otherwise he would have dropped the rolling idea several seasons ago.

T

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
I think selecting height and weight could be interesting. Just allow to pick the height, and there would be several weights within a range.

CB

6'2 190-200
6'1 185-195
6'0 180-190
5'11 180-185

Maybe have consequences for low weight, since everyone will pick it for top speed. And vice versa for too heavy.


Or include some extra SP to be used to buy the ht/wt build of the player as well.

6'2 might cost you 4 SP
6'1 might cost you 3 SP
6'0 might cost you 2 SP
5"11 might cost you 1 SP
Under 5'11 costs you 0 SP

This takes some SP away from the "starting roll" if you want the perfect sized player.

Same can be said for Weight. Figure out what the ideal weight is and each extreme might cost a little more SP and the average/middle might cost less.

Currently some HB's want to roll light, while others want to roll heavy.

Could make lightest weights cost 4 SP and heaviest weights cost 4 SP. Then gradually less SP toward the average/middle.

Originally posted by p@nda
Or include some extra SP to be used to buy the ht/wt build of the player as well.

6'2 might cost you 4 SP
6'1 might cost you 3 SP
6'0 might cost you 2 SP
5"11 might cost you 1 SP
Under 5'11 costs you 0 SP

This takes some SP away from the "starting roll" if you want the perfect sized player.

Same can be said for Weight. Figure out what the ideal weight is and each extreme might cost a little more SP and the average/middle might cost less.

Currently some HB's want to roll light, while others want to roll heavy.

Could make lightest weights cost 4 SP and heaviest weights cost 4 SP. Then gradually less SP toward the average/middle.

Those are some good ideas. Or it could be related to the attributes - more weight means your STR starts out higher but your SPD and AGI are lower, and vice versa.

T

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1691987
How many new players get blocking fb's like this. Prolly lots FFS 11 carry. Reroll time!

would it be hard to just have the user choose their own height and weight combo

sort of have a range -

input height [_____] (minimum is 5'11 inches and maximum is 6'7 inches)

input weight [_____] (minimum is 175lbs and maximum is 325lbs)

Originally posted by David Stern
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1691987
How many new players get blocking fb's like this. Prolly lots FFS 11 carry. Reroll time!

11 carry won't be a big deal in the long term.

nvm

since we're going to make a change here -

how about allowing different player positions to choose their own MAJORS / MINORS - from a position specific pool


but only allow WR/CB to select speed as a MAJOR

When will this happen, I'm ready to create a few new players.

Originally posted by TxSteve
since we're going to make a change here -

how about allowing different player positions to choose their own MAJORS / MINORS - from a position specific pool


but only allow WR/CB to select speed as a MAJOR

how about HB?

good point - sorry - HB should be included as well

FS?

Originally posted by pottsman
FS?

Si