Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Buckeyes33
did i not make this suggestion 3 months ago? they said it wont happen. wait nevermind, only serenity said that cause she doesn't like me.

Serenity doesn't like anyone.

+1

++1

+1 Awesome idea.

Originally posted by jdros13
I think this is absolutely necessary if we are going to allow the offense to move the TE around.

+100

I can't believe we're forced to beg for this - it should have been a given with these new changes.

Blitzing may be dead, and that is wrong.

I am all for this suggestion.

-1.

To play the devil's advocate here, the LB positions are universally referred to as "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in 4-3 schemes and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in 3-4 schemes. Granting the option to designate on the depth chart which LB is the strong/weak LB, I'm all for. But arranging the names into something that resembles a quirk in GLB, I'm not for.

Originally posted by cdcollins
-1.

To play the devil's advocate here, the LB positions are universally referred to as "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in 4-3 schemes and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in 3-4 schemes. Granting the option to designate on the depth chart which LB is the strong/weak LB, I'm all for. But arranging the names into something that resembles a quirk in GLB, I'm not for.

How do you propose the issue is fixed then?

You can call the LB's Moe, Larry, and Curly for all I care, but the ability to shift the TE changes the dynamics of defensive play calling. This is the type of thing that in a regular game could be adjusted for on the fly (if I come out of the huddle knowing we're blitzing/shifting weakside and the offense shifts the weakside we can shift the rush on the fly, if we come out knowing we're blitzing ROLB regardless of strength we can shift coverage on the fly) as it stands now, the AI can't handle it, both from a shift/blitz perspective, AND a man coverage perspective.

Implemented yet?

How about SAM (Strongside) WILL (Weakside) and MIKE (Middle)

Since, yanno, that's what they're actually called.

Originally posted by cdcollins
To play the devil's advocate here, the LB positions are universally referred to as "LOLB, MLB, ROLB" in 4-3 schemes and "LOLB, LILB, RILB, ROLB" in 3-4 schemes. Granting the option to designate on the depth chart which LB is the strong/weak LB, I'm all for. But arranging the names into something that resembles a quirk in GLB, I'm not for.
I'm confused. Are you saying that LOLB/MLB/ROLB is how those positions are called in "real football"? If so, you're wrong. They go by Sam, Mike, and Will, not left, middle, and right. Ditto for 3-4 schemes.

Originally posted by poopoomcgoop
Originally posted by The_Jonas

How about SAM (Strongside) WILL (Weakside) and MIKE (Middle)





because people have fun with making up names

and the 3-4 is a bit different

Shhh... Enough about the names! If any of you saw what happened to my first thread attempt, then I'm sure you know I don't want that again.

Originally posted by enoch101
Also when offense switches sides do they nt and dt switch, do the ss and fs switch?

Everything on the line should be strong/weak delineated

not rde but instead weak de
not nt but instead strong tackle

actually for many teams in highschool-the entire o-line switches sides as well-leading to terms like quick tackle and quick guard (weakside)

This is how it is in High school, College and the NFL lets make it in GLB too.