Originally posted by MC_Hammer
There is a difference between GOOD moderation of a site (and by site I mean one with more than 1000 users, not 200 or less... which seems that GLB may now be, WAY down from it's heydey when mods were running people out left and right) and POOR moderation of a site. When I was a forum moderator for a site with more than 10k users, of course I had to spank unruly types on occasion and ban spammers, but I ALWAYS referenced specific rules when I had to call someone out so they knew EXACTLY where they stood. I didn't beat around the bush or just forum ban someone without warning or explanation which has happened here repeatedly.
Granted, some of the people banned here without explanation deserved it, but an explanation would serve as an example to others on what types of behavior are tolerated or not, particularly when in a gray area of the rules. Sometimes new rules need to be introduced to address certain gray areas that people try to skate around, and these new rules need to be put forth in an announcement for ALL to see.
I actually applied to be a forum moderator before I was a bugs mod, only to get turned down as favorites were played and several were chosen that had no business being a moderator. Now most of those same poor moderators are not even active on the site any more (wonder why?) so I guess there is that, but now we no longer have the active user base that we once had as a result.You haven't lived until you've had a 30 day ban
Granted I've only had one.