Warrior General Games

I like 7

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Pro's for 7 (or even 8) season plateau...

1. It keeps dot cost per season (net of flex refund) in-line with dot costs pre-s100. Otherwise we are paying MORE per month to play a browser game that was very expensive 15 years ago when it came out. (Don't agree it was VERY expensive... do agree about keeping the net cost the same.)
2. It creates more plateau dots and teams so Bort can build out his ladder.
3. It creates more competition at the highest levels of the game.
4. If you have the same # of dots as before, 5/12 seasons of plateau means 44 of each 100 teams was a plateau team previously. If we now had 7/11 seasons of plateau that'd be 64 of each 100 teams is a plateau team. This means your plateau dots/teams increases by 50% even if everyone has the same # of dots as before. (Ok. Makes sense.)
5. Keep GLB alive longer than it would be with less dots/teams. (Disagree. I don't think the life of this game it tied to the length of a dot's life. Plus, the more seasons a dot lives, the less recycling of dots there is... which is LOST revenue to the game. That said, see #1 for agreeing with you the cost doesn't need to increase.)



I bet you thought you'd never hear this but, this is my final thoughts on it all.
#1. I trust Bort. His game math has been tested plenty and has come through more than enough to earn this respect. If he says 6, then I don't wanna hear no bitchin and gripin. If he says 7 I don't wanna hear no bitchin or gripin.
#2. It's gotta be right. This is a ONE AND DONE thing if we're to have a HOF and such stuff be meaningful. Changing it again would just bring all the bitchin and gripin you could imagine.
#3. I've been playing the devils' advocate in this all with my saying 6... mostly to get people to SHOW MATH as to why 7 is the right choice. I've seen a little... would like to see much more in detail. Bort is a numbers guy. C'mon... give him something to work with here... numbers, not words. As for my personal preference, I don't have one really. If it's 6 I'm gonna keep playing and be happy. If it's 7 I'm gonna keep playing and be happy. It's all good. Hope nobody got butthurt.

Once you're in WL team chemistry goes away, and your roster gets locked.

I think TJ Spikes makes an interesting thought here. The team roster you make or go with in WL, the roster gets locked. No reloading of this team. When their time is up they start over at rookie

Would definitely create an opportunity for more teams to have success in the Bigs

The longer you can keep it up, the better...just sayin'

O-Line should have no plateu or at least a very slower reduced plateu. No one likes building O-line dots. This would be a good incentive for people who make O-Line dots. I am biased though because I have O-Line dots

Originally posted by Zello144
O-Line should have no plateu or at least a very slower reduced plateu. No one likes building O-line dots. This would be a good incentive for people who make O-Line dots. I am biased though because I have O-Line dots



No one will take you serious until you display an avatar.

Originally posted by Sithas~Cult~


No one will take you serious until you display an avatar.

Wat? No one cares about a stupid avatar pic. What are you 12?

Originally posted by Zello144

Wat? No one cares about a stupid avatar pic. What are you 12?



What are you? a ghost. season 48 and what 1-2 trophies

Originally posted by pittball1
Once you're in WL team chemistry goes away, and your roster gets locked.

I think TJ Spikes makes an interesting thought here. The team roster you make or go with in WL, the roster gets locked. No reloading of this team. When their time is up they start over at rookie

Would definitely create an opportunity for more teams to have success in the Bigs

no it wouldn't

the WL teams would just have their farm team stay with the team it was built on and move that one on up

the team name would be different, but the agents and coordinators would all be the same

you cannot legislate teams into WL; they are going to have to earn it

Originally posted by Backes-to-Backes

What are you? a ghost.


Booooo

Originally posted by Zello144

Wat? No one cares about a stupid avatar pic. What are you 12?




Fwiw, this is a 15 year old browser game, so forum avatars are like 60% of the game...

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Fwiw, this is a 15 year old browser game, so forum avatars are like 60% of the game...
Bunch of children

Originally posted by Zello144

Bunch of children

nah, we are just immature.

Originally posted by Zello144

Wat? No one cares about a stupid avatar pic. What are you 12?




No, only about 10.5"

Originally posted by Sithas~Cult~
No, only about 10.5"

Your lady told me that you're 2.5 inches on a good day.