User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Season 91 Rankings
Page:
 
Kenshinzen
online
Link
 
Originally posted by King of Bling
Europe: HHWC (#1 Natty Pro Team IMO)



They’re very good team, we came up the ladder from rookie. I underestimated them once in the playoffs and paid for this, will not happen again (and don’t speak for Odyssey, my good team is in the other conference).
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Is that reddog #5 team. Theyre weak
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw
also weird is HoChiMin

1500+ EL? but only level 82?

something is strange there

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=459

they get blown out every game as well


Did they build without any AEQ and/or SAs? That would let them pour everything into building up Effective Level but would result in some craptacular dots. Just a theory though.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
They built a handicapped qb
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Imagine how Novus would build a passer. They have it already
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Imagine how Novus would build a passer. They have it already


 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Is that reddog #5 team. Theyre weak


Santiago is team #5

but yes, they are very weak
 
jmarter
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mauler
Happens all the time, but I only do it to those people who deserve it like you. Others do it just for the sake of doing it and those people I just ignore totally because they are just a$$hats. Would you like to be put in that same category?


Yes, I would like to be put in the category of ones that you ignore.
 
GroupOh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EVERYONE
Everyone appreciates your forum contributions.


 
Dr. E
offline
Link
 

Here is one over 1700 was very effective https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4380373




Originally posted by Novus
Did they build without any AEQ and/or SAs? That would let them pour everything into building up Effective Level but would result in some craptacular dots. Just a theory though.

 
Link
 
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
They’re very good team, we came up the ladder from rookie. I underestimated them once in the playoffs and paid for this, will not happen again (and don’t speak for Odyssey, my good team is in the other conference).



You're using a Player Appreciation Day on the Lions? Wow is that appreciating us for beating ur ass up the ladder

Other teams more deserving of that honor than us
 
Syphon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SmithsterSmitty

You're using a Player Appreciation Day on the Lions? Wow is that appreciating us for beating ur ass up the ladder

Other teams more deserving of that honor than us


Smithy got jokes
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Imagine how Novus would build a passer. They have it already


I've built a passer before. He sucked. That's why I've never built another one.
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Novus

Did they build without any AEQ and/or SAs? That would let them pour everything into building up Effective Level but would result in some craptacular dots. Just a theory though.


Originally posted by Dr. E

Here is one over 1700 was very effective https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4380373


That dot quite clearly had AEQ and SAs, so that's not what I'm talking about. I was theorizing that Ho Chi Mean might be building dots without AEQ or SAs, which in turn would create more of an opportunity to push up his Effective Levels.

But now that I'm home and on my computer instead of at work and on my phone, I can take a closer look at Ho Chi Mean's dots... and I see that they do have AEQ. So that torpedoes my theory.

 
Kenshinzen
online
Link
 
Originally posted by Syphon
Smithy got jokes


He's a good guy and had many competive games until we get here but his team is like the Palookas. When dots mature in Pro, can't do much against them. Could be wrong and his team can do better but this sudden trash talking attitude shows uncertainty.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.