User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Season 91 Rankings
Page:
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
 
King of Bling
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mauler
I think you underestimate the use of a D480-520 dot. If the dot is a good build and well managed during that time the dot can be just as effective as a younger dot. Hence those words, but ignorance doesn't offend me, just can be annoying at times.


Totally agree bro. and I'd even take it a step further; Certain positions can be effective with 520-560 dots, even in WL and certainly Natty Pro.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by King of Bling
Totally agree bro. and I'd even take it a step further; Certain positions can be effective with 520-560 dots, even in WL and certainly Natty Pro.


we won the Pro Tourney once with all decline dots

Ryan's 520 day old (at the start of the season) won an MVP last year in National Pro
 
King of Bling
offline
Link
 
Here's a 560 that won WL MVP: https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4736503
 
jmarter
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mauler
I think you underestimate the use of a D480-520 dot. If the dot is a good build and well managed during that time the dot can be just as effective as a younger dot. Hence those words, but ignorance doesn't offend me, just can be annoying at times.


I did not say that declining dots cannot be effective. I was simply comparing two WL teams (that had a close last matchup, yes I saw that), giving a slight edge in the coming season to one of them. I don't believe having a declining team at the #2 spot is underestimating the use of D480-520 dots. And a meaningless preseason guess at rankings doesn't need to elicit "reprogram yourself" and "ignorance" comments.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Except I knew Mauler would opt for SAPL cupcakeville with supposedly elite decliners so I joined him. Cya soon buddy
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw
we won the Pro Tourney once with all decline dots

Ryan's 520 day old (at the start of the season) won an MVP last year in National Pro


How did Highrollers do last season with your decline scrubs
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Academy, Redwolves, Cowbots, Comets.


You calling out the Redwolves just because I can't view your user page? Annoying... I must avoid you because I cannot do my homework and am not sure if I should talk shit or touch butts.
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
I've never liked a dot enough to ever get to D480..
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Thats my final 4 winners. We will see how accurate I am
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
How did Highrollers do last season with your decline scrubs


given they were our #4 team they did fine
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Pwned
I've never liked a dot enough to ever get to D480..


No kidding. WL or reset for us.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw
given they were our #4 team they did fine


Cool story
 
Mauler
Tsalagi
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jmarter
I did not say that declining dots cannot be effective. I was simply comparing two WL teams (that had a close last matchup, yes I saw that), giving a slight edge in the coming season to one of them. I don't believe having a declining team at the #2 spot is underestimating the use of D480-520 dots. And a meaningless preseason guess at rankings doesn't need to elicit "reprogram yourself" and "ignorance" comments.


You don't get it, those that aren't a good coordinator or a good dot builder and has screwed with certain agents that I trust I will go out of my way to degrade, like YOU. So yes, I think you are a very ignorant person and that is being nice!

 
King of Bling
offline
Link
 
Europe: HHWC (#1 Natty Pro Team IMO)

NAPL: Jersey Showboats

Pacific: Jersey HighRollers

The 3 above seem pretty cut and dry to me. SLAP is REALLY tough to call...
SLAP: BDS or TPSAI

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.