User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
teamriots
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Would James Brown have funked to that?


everyone funks to anything when riding the rails of cocaine

there is no "wrong" if you catch my drift
 
Sonic
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by teamriots
everyone funks to anything when riding the rails of cocaine

there is no "wrong" if you catch my drift


Reported!

James Brown does not funk to just anyone! Especially if they’re out of time or taking attention away from the main.
 
teamriots
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Reported!

James Brown does not funk to just anyone! Especially if they’re out of time or taking attention away from the main.


reported for your weak sensitive feelings, kick rocks little one
 
teamriots
offline
Link
 
Edited by teamriots on Jan 19, 2022 00:52:51
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Not heard of Carrying helping Juke fire

I think that agility is the main reason Juke fires.


this.
 
Sugar Kapaa
\m/
offline
Link
 
Why don't we all read the description of Juke SA, you may find you answer there.
Juke is a fake.
Carry helps with break tackle.
 
Sugar Kapaa
\m/
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Is this a 3 AEQ build?

I would be surprised if any of sunder's builds are 3 AEQ. Most likely 4, knowing his background.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Not heard of Carrying helping Juke fire

I think that agility is the main reason Juke fires.


it helps while carrying the ball, not to make fakes happen before that
 
sunder B
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Is this a 3 AEQ build?


4 AEQ as I need the +58 in speed
 
Bash E. Bull
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RyanCane26
So it looks like it comes down to would you rather have 5-6 more speed or 10-15 more carry/vision.. I could see the argument for the latter


That's the way I've been doing it more or less, but leaving carrying in the 60s and instead getting more vision and mostly, more SAs(I always max all the relevant SAs). I think carrying makes a big difference in avoiding KL, but that is really most important for TEs and rRBs. Not that avoiding KLs isn't important for WRs too, but there is so much else they need to get open against the top CBs (who don't tend to get many KLs anyhow) that its hard for me to justify over other things. Maybe that's just me though. I'm still confused that keeping the primary att in multi-training past the 9 cap is such a thing... to me I can't figure how that works. Less than 8% per train at that point means its only 2 or 3 more points total, when you could single handedly cap multiple attributes with that training. I can't figure out how that is more efficient over all. I've a feeling it makes eff Lev look better but not really worth it, but I don't know because I never tried it.

Originally posted by reddogrw
that's......a lot of vision and carrying, and low agility


70-75 is too much vision for a receiver? I usually get up to the high 70s and feel that is still not enough. Honestly, I feel the guys with higher vision get open more. I'm trying to figure out how to get in into the 80s tbh without having to sacrifice too much else. Does anyone else think 70-75 vision is too much? I feel like I've seen many good WRs have much more...

Originally posted by teamriots
I haven't played in 10 years and I recall this same thing. I recall WR dots having very little carry, thought it was agility


It definitely seems agility is most important for Juke, although it seems to be stated over and over that vision is the most important for fakes. I think it depends who you are trying to fake. My pRB, his 55 vision with 93 agility is plenty to juke DTs and hhLBs all day, but you don't see it fire against good coverage dots. My rRB, his 72 vision and 96 agility is good enough to juke those coverage guys, but I still think he'd do it more frequently if he had more vision.

Originally posted by Sonic
Is this a 3 AEQ build?


definitely 4AEQ. If only 3 we are talking about a completely different set. TBH Ive only ever done 4AEQ. In this case, its all in speed. To get a 5 Major to 160 speed with only 3AEQ would take very very high natural speed.

 
88Spam
offline
Link
 
If they’re any WR dots that you can link, who strived in WL with 70-75 vision I’d love to see. I love seeing out of the usual dots strive at high levels.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 88Spam
If they’re any WR dots that you can link, who strived in WL with 70-75 vision I’d love to see. I love seeing out of the usual dots strive at high levels.


https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4755491

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4755559

our season 85-89 WL WR (won in 89)

QB won 3 MVP's during this time - spread the ball around a lot

none had 70+ vision or carrying - carrying helps you as a runner once you have the ball in your hand for fakes/Juke - not so much before the pass to get open, which is what matters more IMO
 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sonic
Not heard of Carrying helping Juke fire

I think that agility is the main reason Juke fires.


I thought I swore back in the ol' Bort Q&A days that I wrote down where carry helps with the 'football moves' such as spin and fake and such. I could be wrong. Trying to remember stuff from that long ago is dangerous for this ol' brain.
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
I thought I swore back in the ol' Bort Q&A days that I wrote down where carry helps with the 'football moves' such as spin and fake and such. I could be wrong. Trying to remember stuff from that long ago is dangerous for this ol' brain.


I think even it helps "while carrying the football", but not before, which is when a WR needs fakes
 
Sugar Kapaa
\m/
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
carry helps with the 'football moves' such as spin and fake and such./QUOTE]
spin is a break tackle : carry/strength and to an extent jump
fake is a fake : agility/vision
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.