Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Homage
You're going to make it very hard to scheme when you have such a variety at D-line.

You can always put the two agility DEs on one side and the power DEs on the other and then put the two DTs in the NT position and can force sub by using the NT1 spot.

Originally posted by jdbolick

My whole OL had Aura and I think it's not very effective.


I saw a lot of teams that were winning and yet were really struggling with morale. I think this would work well on a Slow Starter team to level the playing field a bit. There's already a lot of places to put SP into SAs on the lines, so, as always, it becomes an opportunity cost question.

Originally posted by Homage
what approach are you referring to again?

you referring to AOI throughout this post or with regards to PD D-linemen?
PD DEs. It seems like if they're evasive pass rushers that they're out of the passing lane on everything but screens.

Originally posted by jdbolick

PD DEs. It seems like if they're evasive pass rushers that they're out of the passing lane on everything but screens.

I'd agree with this. I played with all sort of shit with homages dots and there was differences but at the end of it it wasn't as pronounced as I'd hoped and I ended up using the same dpc base of all my other teams

He next batch could be crazy given what was learned though. Hope I'm still around for it

u concur

*rabble rabble*

Originally posted by evileyez

He next batch could be crazy given what was learned though. Hope I'm still around for it

Hmm... high strength and jumping(crazy high for a NT/DT), high vis, well below average agi/spd, 1 or less BB%aeq, am I close?

Originally posted by evileyez
I'd agree with this. I played with all sort of shit with homages dots and there was differences but at the end of it it wasn't as pronounced as I'd hoped and I ended up using the same dpc base of all my other teams

He next batch could be crazy given what was learned though. Hope I'm still around for it
My starting LDE has some PD in his build and I do get some deflections by weak shifting him, but you probably accomplish the same thing better by just doing it on your DTs and having the DEs create the edge pressure.

Originally posted by Saris
Hmm... high strength and jumping(crazy high for a NT/DT), high vis, well below average agi/spd, 1 or less BB%aeq, am I close?

That's up for homage to disclose sorry

I like how jumping appeared to affect my diving tackle success rate on DTs also, so I'm a firm believer in taking it to 60+ now.

Originally posted by jdbolick
I like how jumping appeared to affect my diving tackle success rate on DTs also, so I'm a firm believer in taking it to 60+ now.

This.

Originally posted by jdbolick
I like how jumping appeared to affect my diving tackle success rate on DTs also, so I'm a firm believer in taking it to 60+ now.

Me 2 on this guy:
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2262157

I'd say firm believer in 49 for a run stuffer -and definitely 61 if you want to get PDs

Originally posted by Saris
Hmm... high strength and jumping(crazy high for a NT/DT), high vis, well below average agi/spd, 1 or less BB%aeq, am I close?

short answer? no.

Originally posted by jdbolick
I like how jumping appeared to affect my diving tackle success rate on DTs also, so I'm a firm believer in taking it to 60+ now.

Originally posted by Time Trial
This.

Ditto.

Originally posted by Homage
short answer? no.

It was just a shot in the dark based on that "You and whose army?" DT.

The one play I looked up he deflected a ball that was 11ft on the z-axis, that takes some hops.