Warrior General Games

maybe GLB is heading in the direction of Techmo Super Bowl where the offense and defense each only get 4 plays to select from.

Originally posted by robponce
question: Have we considered buffs to screens and throwing in IF/THEN clauses for 4+ blitzers?

I.E. if Defense is
blitzing 5 players = +5% to offense if running screen
blitzing 6 players = +10% to offense if running screen
etc.

Kinda a way to encourage strategy?

Screens should absoloutley kill against overload blitzing.Period

Nice knowing you guys. I guess I'm out of a job?

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt
Nice knowing you guys. I guess I'm out of a job?

hey tranny ... thoughts on the latest GLB "bust"

Will defenses still have the option to set a player to cover a HB but if that HB stays in to block than go cover the TE or a WR?

Originally posted by whodey08
Will defenses still have the option to set a player to cover a HB but if that HB stays in to block than go cover the TE or a WR?

nope its all casual now, better get a ton of nachos to cover that HB then!

Originally posted by Catch22
We are possibly discussing just limiting movement of players and seeing if that helps resolve the issue that we have been facing.



Reminder for those who haven't bothered to read the OP.

I hope we don't lose the ability to blitz a FS, SS or CB. That would suck.

Worst GLB decision ever. I see my involvement with GLB, which sadly is far too high, coming to a screeching halt when/if these changes go into effect. You can't figure out how to fix the issue, which in my opinion is not really an issue as every team equally faces the same thing, so you just take the game back to the prehistoric version of its current self. Just pathetic. There was a reason to move away from only having casual league options!!

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by Catch22

We are possibly discussing just limiting movement of players and seeing if that helps resolve the issue that we have been facing.



Reminder for those who haven't bothered to read the OP.

ok "limiting player movements then"

can a DE still drop back into a zone coverage then, etc

Originally posted by Thundercat_12
ok "limiting player movements then"

can a DE still drop back into a zone coverage then, etc

Pretty sure this means pre-snap alignments only.

"We need to find a way to get more people uninvolved with the game."

"I know! Let's delete the defensive play creator!"

i cant wait till this goes in effect

so i will finally realize that glb is a waste of money

please take away one of the only fun things people like to play with(and half the time not even use) because you cant control the exploits. makes total sense.

Originally posted by Thundercat_12
ok "limiting player movements then"

can a DE still drop back into a zone coverage then, etc

Yes, they would just be limited in their positioning.

Originally posted by Catch22
Reminder for those who haven't bothered to read the OP.

There are already limits on defensive player's movement. If you limit it much further, it makes the DPC much less effective, unless the goal is to have games with ridiculous offensive stats, even with equally solid teams. The "exploits" that exist now are far less hazardous to the enjoyment of the game than what you are projecting as your "fix"!