Warrior General Games

Originally posted by 420sega
Show me a replay where someone fumbles in the EZ. You can't because just as HAS BEEN SHOWn in the offensive end zone, tackling takes precedence. So the ball carrier OBVIOUSLY FUMBLES THE BALL, yet the tackle takes precedence in the sim because its in the EZ and the call of safetey immediately ends the play, even though the ball is loose. Seeing all the dumb ass responses in this thread, I have to agree with the comment that yu are all a bunch of butthurt loser incels, with no lives at all. Its hilarious how you all bitch and complain about this games flaws until something really happens to fuck of players, and then you are full of bullshit excuses like you have Stockholm sydrome or something. Literally you are all the biggest losers alive. No wonder even the urban dictionary says you are all a bunch of virgin pimple faced losers living in your parents basement- everyone is right about you people. No one will miss you when you're gone.

Originally posted by 420sega
Both graphic versions of the sim show the same thing... it was a fumble. I just received a response from support: its a bug- it WAS a fumble, not a visual bug. You are all a bunch of fucking morons who don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

feel free to log out and never log back in.

Originally posted by 420sega
I just received a response from support: its a bug- .

They're just patronizing you to try to talk you off the ledge so that nobody below gets hurt.
Standard operating procedure.

Show the response otherwise you're talking out of your ass.

And it needs to be a screen shot of their response. Otherwise you could simply edit it to fit your needs.

Originally posted by 420sega
Show me a replay where someone fumbles in the EZ. You can't because just as HAS BEEN SHOWn in the offensive end zone, tackling takes precedence. So the ball carrier OBVIOUSLY FUMBLES THE BALL, yet the tackle takes precedence in the sim because its in the EZ and the call of safetey immediately ends the play, even though the ball is loose. Seeing all the dumb ass responses in this thread, I have to agree with the comment that yu are all a bunch of butthurt loser incels, with no lives at all. Its hilarious how you all bitch and complain about this games flaws until something really happens to fuck of players, and then you are full of bullshit excuses like you have Stockholm sydrome or something. Literally you are all the biggest losers alive. No wonder even the urban dictionary says you are all a bunch of virgin pimple faced losers living in your parents basement- everyone is right about you people. No one will miss you when you're gone.

Darncat, is that you?

If you're going to use a word, at least use it correctly. It's clear you have no clue what it means but saw it somewhere and thought it was cool. We're the losers yet you constantly rage about well known things that you claim aren't explained when they truly are. No one is forcing you to keep playing. Feel free to log our any time you like and never come back.

Incel... you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Originally posted by Novus
Incel... you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

inconceivable

Originally posted by Seric
Show the response otherwise you're talking out of your ass.

This. If you're telling the truth, then that flies in the face of EVERYTHING that has ever been said by Bort and the Admins over the years. Given the choice of believing 10 years of the admins saying the text trumps the graphics versus one angry guy with a history of misunderstanding basic game concepts who calls everyone who disagrees with him an incel, well... I don't believe you. Feel free to prove me otherwise with a screenshot of the Support response.

Now I am afraid to add fuel to the fire. I don't agree with the OP implying that a fumble occurred here.........but, are there any examples of fumbles occurring on plays like this?

Since you have to win the tackle roll first before you get the FF roll, is it impossible to fumble in that scenario based on how GLB is coded? That is a different question, and doesn't change that a fumble did not occur, but I am curious if a fumble can occur on a play like that.

I seem to recall a similar discussion many moons ago about very rare KL's in the end zone which was kind of a similar thing in that the receiver catches the ball in the endzone before the KL roll occurs, therefore KL's were very rare in the endzone. That may have been fixed at some point, but I do recall it being discussed as an issue.

Originally posted by 420sega
Both graphic versions of the sim show the same thing... it was a fumble. I just received a response from support: its a bug- it WAS a fumble, not a visual bug. You are all a bunch of fucking morons who don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Did it matter? Your team got handled pretty easily, and that TD still would have resulted in a L for you and your multi.

Originally posted by sunder B
Now I am afraid to add fuel to the fire. I don't agree with the OP implying that a fumble occurred here.........but, are there any examples of fumbles occurring on plays like this?

Since you have to win the tackle roll first before you get the FF roll, is it impossible to fumble in that scenario based on how GLB is coded? That is a different question, and doesn't change that a fumble did not occur, but I am curious if a fumble can occur on a play like that.

I seem to recall a similar discussion many moons ago about very rare KL's in the end zone which was kind of a similar thing in that the receiver catches the ball in the endzone before the KL roll occurs, therefore KL's were very rare in the endzone. That may have been fixed at some point, but I do recall it being discussed as an issue.

this brings up something that I noticed the other day. can a deflected pass be intercepted? http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2951445&pbp_id=920701 sure looks like the FS intercepted this. normally, you can see part of the player under the ball, unless the player has control of the ball. also, notice that the ball was horizontal then changes to vertical. i just cant recall any interceptions off of deflected passes, and figure that it's coded that if the receiver doesnt catch the deflected pass, which i have seen, then the code says the play is over and doesnt even look for other players in the area.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this brings up something that I noticed the other day. can a deflected pass be intercepted? http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2951445&pbp_id=920701 sure looks like the FS intercepted this. normally, you can see part of the player under the ball, unless the player has control of the ball. also, notice that the ball was horizontal then changes to vertical. i just cant recall any interceptions off of deflected passes, and figure that it's coded that if the receiver doesnt catch the deflected pass, which i have seen, then the code says the play is over and doesnt even look for other players in the area.

There was a time, i forgot what season, that there was a huge spike in INTs becuase of deflected passes. I forget all the details about it. But it may have been removed after that season. There was alot of silly INTs off of some crazy deflections.

Originally posted by Guppy, Inc
this brings up something that I noticed the other day. can a deflected pass be intercepted? http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2951445&pbp_id=920701 sure looks like the FS intercepted this. normally, you can see part of the player under the ball, unless the player has control of the ball. also, notice that the ball was horizontal then changes to vertical. i just cant recall any interceptions off of deflected passes, and figure that it's coded that if the receiver doesnt catch the deflected pass, which i have seen, then the code says the play is over and doesnt even look for other players in the area.

I have seen passes deflected at the LoS get picked before. I'll see if I can dig one up