You are a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
PS, I didn't watch the video.
PS, I didn't watch the video.
Edited by FlopTheNuts on Feb 6, 2014 08:18:45
Forum > General Discussion > Politics and Religion > Watch the video... then call me a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
taurran
offline
offline
Originally posted by rams78110
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
Venkman
offline
offline
Originally posted by taurran
Don't like hearing the truth? Clearly you know nothing if you're face palming that. It's a well-known fact that the FBI aided the 1993 bombers.
Originally posted by taurran
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
Originally posted by each of those souces
The transcripts do not make clear the extent to which Federal Authorities knew that there was a plan to bomb the World Trade Center, merely that a bombing of some sort was being discussed.
I read all those links. It seems as if the FBI knew there were plans for a bombing at one of several targets, but did not have more specifics than that. as to the plan to substitute the powder, than choosing not to, it's entirely possible that wasn't a case of 'wanting to aid the bombers' as it was simply a tactical judgement fuck up.
not seeing anything that points to the FBI actually intentionally aiding the bombers. I see more of that they had some information about it, but that info was unclear, incomplete, and also likely improperly used.
for many of us, when we say we don't believe the full story of the 911 bombing, this is what we are talking about. Do I believe the official story that a group of terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the world trade center, causing them to burn and subsequently collapse? yes, I do. all of the 'evidence' presented to the contrary has been thoroughly debunked. however, I also believe that, similar to what I said above regarding the 1993 bombings, I think it likely that several branches of US 'Intelligence' knew more beforehand. than they are letting on, and that info was incomplete, but then also probably several very bad decisions and tactical errors were made with that info, mistakes and errors that, if they had not occurred, could have possibly led to preventing 911.
ed: holy shit, please ignore the godawful grammar and sentence structure above.
Don't like hearing the truth? Clearly you know nothing if you're face palming that. It's a well-known fact that the FBI aided the 1993 bombers.
Originally posted by taurran
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
Originally posted by each of those souces
The transcripts do not make clear the extent to which Federal Authorities knew that there was a plan to bomb the World Trade Center, merely that a bombing of some sort was being discussed.
I read all those links. It seems as if the FBI knew there were plans for a bombing at one of several targets, but did not have more specifics than that. as to the plan to substitute the powder, than choosing not to, it's entirely possible that wasn't a case of 'wanting to aid the bombers' as it was simply a tactical judgement fuck up.
not seeing anything that points to the FBI actually intentionally aiding the bombers. I see more of that they had some information about it, but that info was unclear, incomplete, and also likely improperly used.
for many of us, when we say we don't believe the full story of the 911 bombing, this is what we are talking about. Do I believe the official story that a group of terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the world trade center, causing them to burn and subsequently collapse? yes, I do. all of the 'evidence' presented to the contrary has been thoroughly debunked. however, I also believe that, similar to what I said above regarding the 1993 bombings, I think it likely that several branches of US 'Intelligence' knew more beforehand. than they are letting on, and that info was incomplete, but then also probably several very bad decisions and tactical errors were made with that info, mistakes and errors that, if they had not occurred, could have possibly led to preventing 911.
ed: holy shit, please ignore the godawful grammar and sentence structure above.
Edited by seths99 on Feb 6, 2014 10:27:32
taurran
offline
offline
Originally posted by seths99
I read all those links. It seems as if the FBI knew there were plans for a bombing at one of several targets, but did not have more specifics than that. as to the plan to substitute the powder, than choosing not to, it's entirely possible that wasn't a case of 'wanting to aid the bombers' as it was simply a tactical judgement fuck up.
not seeing anything that points to the FBI actually intentionally aiding the bombers. I see more of that they had some information about it, but that info was unclear, incomplete, and also likely improperly used.
for many of us, when we say we don't believe the full story of the 911 bombing, this is what we are talking about. Do I believe the official story that a group of terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the world trade center, causing them to burn and subsequently collapse? yes, I do. all of the 'evidence' presented to the contrary has been thoroughly debunked. however, I also believe that, similar to what I said above regarding the 1993 bombings, I think it likely that several branches of US 'Intelligence' knew more beforehand. than they are letting on, and that info was incomplete, but then also probably several very bad decisions and tactical errors were made with that info, mistakes and errors that, if they had not occurred, could have possibly led to preventing 911.
ed: holy shit, please ignore the godawful grammar and sentence structure above.
Fair enough.
I read all those links. It seems as if the FBI knew there were plans for a bombing at one of several targets, but did not have more specifics than that. as to the plan to substitute the powder, than choosing not to, it's entirely possible that wasn't a case of 'wanting to aid the bombers' as it was simply a tactical judgement fuck up.
not seeing anything that points to the FBI actually intentionally aiding the bombers. I see more of that they had some information about it, but that info was unclear, incomplete, and also likely improperly used.
for many of us, when we say we don't believe the full story of the 911 bombing, this is what we are talking about. Do I believe the official story that a group of terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the world trade center, causing them to burn and subsequently collapse? yes, I do. all of the 'evidence' presented to the contrary has been thoroughly debunked. however, I also believe that, similar to what I said above regarding the 1993 bombings, I think it likely that several branches of US 'Intelligence' knew more beforehand. than they are letting on, and that info was incomplete, but then also probably several very bad decisions and tactical errors were made with that info, mistakes and errors that, if they had not occurred, could have possibly led to preventing 911.
ed: holy shit, please ignore the godawful grammar and sentence structure above.
Fair enough.
LoperK
offline
offline
http://www.newamericancentury.org/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
Don't know why it's suspended, but here's the wiki description of the think tank: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but worth a read.
Don't know why it's suspended, but here's the wiki description of the think tank: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but worth a read.
taurran
offline
offline
Originally posted by LoperK
http://www.newamericancentury.org/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
Don't know why it's suspended, but here's the wiki description of the think tank: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but worth a read.
PNAC is a conspiracy, and it is real.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi
Don't know why it's suspended, but here's the wiki description of the think tank: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Don't know if this has been brought up before, but worth a read.
PNAC is a conspiracy, and it is real.
Originally posted by taurran
PNAC is a conspiracy, and it is real.
Now I have to unblock loper... I thought he might eventually bring up some good stuff. Sorry for mis-judging you, loper
PNAC is a conspiracy, and it is real.
Now I have to unblock loper... I thought he might eventually bring up some good stuff. Sorry for mis-judging you, loper
Originally posted by rams78110
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
Question.... how much thermite would have been required to dropvthe twin towers?
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
Question.... how much thermite would have been required to dropvthe twin towers?
Gnosis
offline
offline
Originally posted by FlopTheNuts
You are a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
PS, I didn't watch the video.
Originally posted by rams78110
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
You two are fucking morons.
You are a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
PS, I didn't watch the video.
Originally posted by rams78110
So the CT truthers have inadvertently made the cases stronger that the 1993 and 2001 attacks weren't inside jobs. That what all the masters of rhetoric do, improve the other side's argument. GG mates.
You two are fucking morons.
Originally posted by taurran
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
"An Egyptian claimed there was a bomb" somehow turns into "The FBI bombed it"
lolu
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
"An Egyptian claimed there was a bomb" somehow turns into "The FBI bombed it"
lolu
I also notice the people who understand physics here aren't the ones flying off the handle and finger-raping their keyboard with insults when someone questions them 
baumusc
offline
offline
Originally posted by OverFiveHundred
I feel like I come into this thread once every few months with the idea to troll, and then I realize I'll never be as good of a troll as these guys and get depressed a little. No idea why I keep on coming back, probably the man and his mind waves.
Chemtrails.
I feel like I come into this thread once every few months with the idea to troll, and then I realize I'll never be as good of a troll as these guys and get depressed a little. No idea why I keep on coming back, probably the man and his mind waves.
Chemtrails.
baumusc
offline
offline
Originally posted by taurran
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
Do you guys get your news from the same source? You all use these catch phrases like 'willfully ignorant' and 'fucking sheep', it is like you have been instructed what to say.
And the entire time, you continue to be content being willfully ignorant, without even attempting to do research yourself. You refuse to even do a simple google search. Here, let me help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing#FBI_involvement
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html
Fucking sheep.
Do you guys get your news from the same source? You all use these catch phrases like 'willfully ignorant' and 'fucking sheep', it is like you have been instructed what to say.
Originally posted by baumusc
Do you guys get your news from the same source? You all use these catch phrases like 'willfully ignorant' and 'fucking sheep', it is like you have been instructed what to say.
No no no. They can't be impressionable, paranoid little sheep like us. They're all beautiful individual minds who singlehandedly outsmarted the government's best and brightest and blew the lid off the greatest conspiracy in the history of the world.
Do you guys get your news from the same source? You all use these catch phrases like 'willfully ignorant' and 'fucking sheep', it is like you have been instructed what to say.
No no no. They can't be impressionable, paranoid little sheep like us. They're all beautiful individual minds who singlehandedly outsmarted the government's best and brightest and blew the lid off the greatest conspiracy in the history of the world.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
