Warrior General Games

Originally posted by baumusc
Sure. Question things to a point but don't make shit up.

To what point should we question, and then upon reaching it stop questioning? If we did that then string theory would not exist. A question that should stand out to you is this.... If an airplane plus 57 minute fire could cause a building to drop, then why does it take an airplane plus 57 minute fire plus tons and tons of explosives to drop it? Couldn't it have quite easily have been done with an airplane, 57 minute fire and enough explosives to destroy the beams on one floor? Or, even better... an airplane plus 57 minute fire plus explosives to take out strategically selected beams on only one floor!

So, here is the question

Which of the following would have dropped the buildings

A) an airplane plus 57 minute fire
B) an airplane plus 57 minute fire and a small amount of explosives
C) an airplane plus 57 minute fire and tons and tons of explosives
D) 7 hours of fire alone
E) magic

All of the above would have. A and E did.

I mean if we're gunna add shit and say 'well it could have so it definitely did' why stop at that pansy shit? I have undeniable proof there was a small nuclear warhead on the 4th floor, attached to the structural beam on the east side, in addition to the two suicide bombers on the 9th floor right by the Bank of America servers, and one further explosive charge in the cubicle of Jerry on the 89th floor, because fuck Jerry.

Originally posted by rams78110
I mean if we're gunna add shit and say 'well it could have so it definitely did' why stop at that pansy shit? I have undeniable proof there was a small nuclear warhead on the 4th floor, attached to the structural beam on the east side, in addition to the two suicide bombers on the 9th floor right by the Bank of America servers, and one further explosive charge in the cubicle of Jerry on the 89th floor, because fuck Jerry.

I was just curious as to why you made an assumption of massive amounts of explosives, yet you believe fire was all it took. It seems a bit skewed. And as for outsmarting the nations brightest minds: I was the nuclear physics primary instructor at one of the national engineering lab's training facilities. I didn't outsmart them, I noticed that what you were told a lie. They outsmarted you!

WATCH YOU BACK!

Originally posted by wormser1971
I was just curious as to why you made an assumption of massive amounts of explosives, yet you believe fire was all it took. It seems a bit skewed. And as for outsmarting the nations brightest minds: I was the nuclear physics primary instructor at one of the national engineering lab's training facilities. I didn't outsmart them, I noticed that what you were told a lie. They outsmarted you!

Ok apparently it wasn't clear, I was being sarcastic. There was no nuclear warhead, suicide bombing, or explosive device in Jerry's cubicle.

No you weren't, you were a janitor