Outside rushing is a must for me to stop when I am comprising a DC plan, but I often find to overload blitzes to stop the better outside rushing teams from killing me, that I am forced to go to a dime or quarter defense as the LBs simply will not move outside of their box. And CBs of course have a higher rate of missed tackles.
Has any thought been given to allowing more freedom in using the custom D alignments? Such as when choosing 4-3 weak or 4-3 strong, allowing a greater range of placement, rather than just automatically moving the defense to a strong side or weak side alignment?
I know it could be argued that you don't want to make defensive tools too strong, but considering that there is nothing from stopping a team to running the OTHER direction where you have a significant lack of containment, and also figuring in the importance of stopping the outside rush with the speed skill players have, I think it would be a good decision.
(To clarify, I'm only talking about dot placement in the D-AI setup not how they react during a play.)
Has any thought been given to allowing more freedom in using the custom D alignments? Such as when choosing 4-3 weak or 4-3 strong, allowing a greater range of placement, rather than just automatically moving the defense to a strong side or weak side alignment?
I know it could be argued that you don't want to make defensive tools too strong, but considering that there is nothing from stopping a team to running the OTHER direction where you have a significant lack of containment, and also figuring in the importance of stopping the outside rush with the speed skill players have, I think it would be a good decision.
(To clarify, I'm only talking about dot placement in the D-AI setup not how they react during a play.)
Edited by secondeye on Oct 20, 2010 18:53:51