Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Argonut
Not getting a Vaccine is just like being on welfare. You sit back and live off the herd immunity created by those that do the work by getting vaccinated.

To be fair people who dont get the covid shot will still help herd immunity by getting covid instead.

Originally posted by Sithas~Cult~
sounds like we are here

If you want an unbiased and accurate answer brother, PM me.

Originally posted by Norse
If you want an unbiased and accurate answer brother, PM me.

Lol. Yeah Norse has the inside scoop on life. Just ask him, he'll tell you.

Day 11 post-vac:

Still here. Though my lower back is a bit sore. Called the CDC to report, and they're suggesting there's a possibility it could be from the round of golf I played on Thursday...but I know that's just what they want me to believe...I'm no sheep!

Well, for a start no vaccination exists and this is a gross misuse of the term, as it fulfils none of the 3 requirements. It neither immunises you stops you transmitting (apparently) or stops you getting ill.

The fact that this boogieman virus is not mass produced to innoculate should be a warning sign to the most avid covid cultist, as it has never been isolated, no test tests for covid, no vaccine vaccinates against covid, as covid does not actually exist.

Flu rebranded.

Hey Norse. Guess what they call a flu shot?

Originally posted by Theo Wizzago
Hey Norse. Guess what they call a flu shot?

And this legitamises it?

To be a vaccine, it also needs to contain the virus itself.

Since Covid has never been isolated, purified, had Koch's postulates ran on it to test whether or not it is transmissable, and the fact that no institution in the world including the NHS here in UK, or CDC in the states holds a sample and never has done, this is quackery with the backing of media.

This is an IQ test. If you're below 70 IQ, you'll get the vaccine, and you fail.

I wouldn't imagine for a second that you low end pro vaxxers would be able to understand, but there is a massive difference between relative efficacy and absolute efficacy. The truth is, that the 90% figure bandied about is a toxic misrepresentation. The actual figure, using the poison maker's own stats is 0.6%.

And they use very low hanging fulfilment criteria on top of that.

Originally posted by Norse
I wouldn't imagine for a second that you low end pro vaxxers would be able to understand, but there is a massive difference between relative efficacy and absolute efficacy. The truth is, that the 90% figure bandied about is a toxic misrepresentation. The actual figure, using the poison maker's own stats is 0.6%.

And they use very low hanging fulfilment criteria on top of that.

The funny thing is, I'm not a "pro vaxxer". I believe everyone should make their own decision. My entire life/career has been dedicated to the sciences. I've done my own research, and chose science over conspiracy theory. Its how humans have made it to this point in history, even with the greedy, evil, and conspiracy theorists doing their best to drag us backwards along the way. I also believe the disease is not as bad as it was initially feared. That is a good thing. That doesn't make people who "thought" that all along "right" in hindsight. It means they guessed heads or tails correctly. I'm glad you were "right". We all are. This doesn't mean it was a "hoax". Doesn't mean there aren't hundreds of thousands dead and dying. Doesn't at the same time mean some of them wouldn't have died from other causes (including the flu) anyways. Also doesn't mean there aren't those out there profiteering off of the fear (media, companies, etc.). These don't have to be mutually exclusive events. They can all be true. Ask India how their "annual flu" is going right about now. Though I'm sure you have a perfect explanation for it that somehow fits your preconceived narrative. That's what makes conspiracy theories so easy. Just write the story along the way and keep your paranoid audience engaged. I mean, if L. Ron Hubbard taught us anything it's that a good storyteller can convince feeble-minded people to believe anything.

What I don't believe is that self-righteous people on the internet should pretend like they have the "right" answer and mislead others with fake statistics and big words they parrot off their favorite "news" sources, and then have the audacity to call others "sheep". The irony is really quite sad/laughable. Or maybe you really do have the "inside scoop" Norse? Are you a professional immunologist? Or at least a microbiologist? Been working in a lab and seen firsthand that it's really just a conspiracy that every country and thousands upon thousands of scientists are all in on? I'm just glad "they" haven't offed you yet for exposing the best coordinated hoax of all time!

Oh, and...Happy Sunday all!

I'm giving people information - nothing self righteous about that at all. In fact, I welcome really low IQ people like you taking the jab - this is a great thing to rid ourselves of the really low end people of society.

Crack on.

Love people who make fun of what you believe in and then proceed to tell you what to believe in lmao

Has anyone done any research into Geert Vander Bossche PhD. ? I suggest everyone do a quick little read on his findings before the Media get him shut down. I specifically like how this common news writer in this article tried to pretend he knows more than a Viral Doctor,

https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/addressing-geert-vanden-bossches-claims

oh, here are his credentials.

https://be.linkedin.com/in/geertvandenbossche

Dude thats not on CNN so it isnt true