Warrior General Games

Originally posted by xeef


Seriously, I was trying to be nice and not rub this in, but HAHA, you are behind me! NEENER!

Its a very safe bet that your guy does not get ten INTs against the donkeys, and that wont prove that your guy isnt better. Stats at this level vs CPUs are completely random. in the first game, their QB threw 1 pass. good luck intercepting 10 passes if he throws 1 pass.

Just sit back and enjoy your currently second place INT corner and stop making idiotic predictions. Second best is okay. My guy finished second in MVP 3 straight years, and if he is blessed enough to finish second to your dot this year, I will be very happy to see that at least a DE didnt get it.

But you, of course, might be suicidal, as your entire free time seems to be spent bragging about your cornerback in forums.



Only part of our roster is CPU

Originally posted by xeef
I have never claimed to be the best. Im just laughing at the moron who did.

And my level 79 guy was better at level 73. I totally f'ed up this build by adding too much agility modification. too much agility on my guy right now.

Judging by your EL, you fucked up your build well before level 73.

As for the INT race, Not a Yes Man now has two more in the blowout adjusted race since he's actually gone up against two real teams. Your guy, on the other hand, hasn't played a real team yet. We'll see what happens once he does. I'm sure he won't single handedly win a game for his team like Not a Yes Man did today. That was how the best dot in the league plays.

xeef's CB plays a real team and only gets 1 INT. Now Not a Yes Man is ahead in INTs in regular and blowout adjusted. And he's back on top for DMVP.

Also, his EL isn't terrible like xeef's.

Heh, again, I never claimed to be better.

And his effective level, like ALL of my guys, is low by design. Everyone on this site is afraid to overcommit to SAs. Which is smart if you are satisfied with only taking a few SAs high. But there are a lot of BROKEN SAs that people ignore. If he had too much agility for what he is designed to do, allowing his EL to be higher, he would suck.

Say what you will, but he certainly does not suck.

Originally posted by basshound3
Only part of our roster is CPU


um... sorry? I just assumed.

Originally posted by backstop


I have very nice DE's thank you.

Your DE "finishing at the top" is hardly the same as the 2nd best dot in the league, which is what your compatriot is being hassled about. What's the "top" anyway?

& We'll see if your there at the end or not.

GG Dakar

CONF all DE Rank: 8. nice, MD. Middle of the pack is AWESOME, it keeps people from game planning against him the second half of the season.

Originally posted by xeef
Heh, again, I never claimed to be better.

And his effective level, like ALL of my guys, is low by design. Everyone on this site is afraid to overcommit to SAs. Which is smart if you are satisfied with only taking a few SAs high. But there are a lot of BROKEN SAs that people ignore. If he had too much agility for what he is designed to do, allowing his EL to be higher, he would suck.

Say what you will, but he certainly does not suck.

You can commit to SAs and still have a decent EL. You're just using bad build techniques.

Originally posted by xeef
um... sorry? I just assumed.



well don't you just look like a jackass now?

Nothing new there

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
You can commit to SAs and still have a decent EL. You're just using bad build techniques.


well, considering I hadnt built a guy for 15 or so seasons when I built him, probably. i *THINK* he was a season 1 early booster. Most of that team was.

But I dont think you understand the level of commitment I am speaking of. And you also ignore the fact that there were a couple attributes here I didnt want to take too high.

You should really build an entire secondary with that same build, see what happens. Just find someone to build a better DE to compliment them.

Originally posted by xeef
CONF all DE Rank: 8. nice, MD. Middle of the pack is AWESOME, it keeps people from game planning against him the second half of the season.



Pretty unusual season for him so far......but you know, He was better at level 66. I totally f'ed up this build by adding too much agility modification. too much agility on my guy right now.....yeah I'll go with that excuse lol

Oh queef, you so crazy

Originally posted by MD
Pretty unusual season for him so far......but you know, He was better at level 66. I totally f'ed up this build by adding too much agility modification. too much agility on my guy right now.....yeah I'll go with that excuse lol

Oh queef, you so crazy

That makes no sense, MD. Why would a DE want to appear to be beaten? I mean, an for an INT corner, the reasons are obvious.

And, to be fair, I am being too hard on you. I have noticed you have stopped talking smack like a moron since your guy has regressed to the mean. Good for you.

Originally posted by xeef
That makes no sense, MD. Why would a DE want to appear to be beaten? I mean, an for an INT corner, the reasons are obvious.

And, to be fair, I am being too hard on you. I have noticed you have stopped talking smack like a moron since your guy has regressed to the mean. Good for you.





Guess that went right over your head didn't it but to be fair, you are a moron so ill let it slide.

Never really started to be honest, this forum is pretty dull.....prolly due to your company

3 more INTs by Not a Yes Man in a legit game. He still has more regular and blowout adjusted INTs than that low EL CB even though he has played more real teams.