User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Test Server Discussion > Potential Changes (things we're testing)
Page:
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tragula
Lol deep passing nerf, recivers was suppose to get lost, but it is DBs that gone blind.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33167
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33458
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33664

Maybe just a bunch of VA resets, but look easier then ever.


Well tbf, we aren't giving your qb any pressure there and our secondary needs to do some tactic changing and maybe possible build changing as well if they have to spend that much time weaving around the field following a WR.
 
joe blitz
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Catch22
I can't evaluate things based on rage.


And just like that, Catch lost his chance to become the GLB Tea Party candidate.
 
tragula
title
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by tragula

Lol deep passing nerf, recivers was suppose to get lost, but it is DBs that gone blind.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33167
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33458
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1981416&pbp_id=33664

Maybe just a bunch of VA resets, but look easier then ever.


Well tbf, we aren't giving your qb any pressure there and our secondary needs to do some tactic changing and maybe possible build changing as well if they have to spend that much time weaving around the field following a WR.


Was not a a brag post. Passing game looked to easy to me in a couple of games I watched (against competition that should be strong). That HB build, should not let him catch deep balls against double coverage.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tragula
Was not a a brag post. Passing game looked to easy to me in a couple of games I watched (against competition that should be strong). That HB build, should not let him catch deep balls against double coverage.


Wasn't saying it was a brag. Saying our defenses are not good in that game thus making things look easier than they really are.
 
ufshowboat
I has 7 titles
offline
Link
 
Great... All 5 people in GLB that care about special teams are here and their posts combine for about 28 of these 30 pages... Great reflection of the GLB public.

Is there anybody in this thread arguing something other than what will directly help their own team/players?
 
Black Peter
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ufshowboat

Is there anybody in this thread arguing something other than what will directly help their own team/players?


Not going to argue about it, but the line interaction has taken a serious step back with the O being way too dominate once again.
 
Longhornfan1024
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ufshowboat
Great... All 5 people in GLB that care about special teams are here and their posts combine for about 28 of these 30 pages... Great reflection of the GLB public.

Is there anybody in this thread arguing something other than what will directly help their own team/players?


I prefer arguing about what will help the game be more fun. At this point, you might as well just skip over kick and punt returns, because nothing will happen there to affect the game. GLB just took a giant, steaming dump on 1/3 of the game.
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ufshowboat
Great... All 5 people in GLB that care about special teams are here and their posts combine for about 28 of these 30 pages... Great reflection of the GLB public.

Is there anybody in this thread arguing something other than what will directly help their own team/players?


Hi, am I too late for the party?
 
alindyl
offline
Link
 
Catch, if you're still reading to this page, is there any possibility of some change with progressions since QB's seem to be more apt to hold on the ball when they are able and then they seem to just stare at the 5th progression until they have to throw.

There has been a suggestion of adding more progressions, or perhaps (one i thought of) that maybe once the QB reaches the 5th progression for a long enough time, will cycle back through to 1 and repeat? Or is this more of a QB tactics setting that might need to change to account for the changes that we'll just have to consider?

 
Mike1709
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by alindyl
Catch, if you're still reading to this page, is there any possibility of some change with progressions since QB's seem to be more apt to hold on the ball when they are able and then they seem to just stare at the 5th progression until they have to throw.

There has been a suggestion of adding more progressions, or perhaps (one i thought of) that maybe once the QB reaches the 5th progression for a long enough time, will cycle back through to 1 and repeat? Or is this more of a QB tactics setting that might need to change to account for the changes that we'll just have to consider?



I saw a replay yesterday (might have been in the bugs thread) where a QB went through 7 progressions so they don't always get stuck on the 5th one.
 
alindyl
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mike1709
I saw a replay yesterday (might have been in the bugs thread) where a QB went through 7 progressions so they don't always get stuck on the 5th one.


Good to hear then. As long as they account for it that's fine. Saw a few replays today where it seemed like the QB would get to a guy deep down field and just stare at him until he had no choice but to throw the ball.
 
Mike1709
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by alindyl
Good to hear then. As long as they account for it that's fine. Saw a few replays today where it seemed like the QB would get to a guy deep down field and just stare at him until he had no choice but to throw the ball.


Maybe they get stuck on the 5th receiver with the endzone bug but open field plays they don't.

Found the thread with the examples in: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4862756
 
kfarmshi
offline
Link
 
Are these changes going to affect the players effective levels if they have or already been employed?
 
Homage
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kfarmshi
Are these changes going to affect the players effective levels if they have or already been employed?


wat
 
alindyl
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by kfarmshi
Are these changes going to affect the players effective levels if they have or already been employed?


I don't think there has been any change that would affect the SP value of a player. The 4 new VA's only affect chances to do something, not an increase in attributes. Or did you mean, are they going to re-calculate the effective levels again for this season?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.