Warrior General Games

I felt bad until C22 shat all over your DAI and OAI. the HB draw is a sorry ass play. I am an OC and that play is not even in my playbook.

I would also be wary of a CPU team that is HUMAN OWNED!!

That was the bad thing you did. It is not like a CPU team using the regular playbook. It was a CPU team with an OC and DC.

Bad gameplanning.

Originally posted by dbrewington
+1

Just follow the link.. Catch22 pretty much just called you the worst Coaching Staff on GLB..

He's so smart, too. Seriously, look what he said. He's saying (as DC) I was playing too much single coverage. Then, to demonstrate his point, he posts a play of a TE in single coverage, catching a first down pass. So, apparently, a "good" scheme is double and triple covering a TE all game...

If that's what one of the main creators of this game thinks, then this game is doomed.

Yeah, our D A.I. is so terrible that it forced 7 THREE-AND-OUTS during this game. It's so terrible that it hurried the QB 12 times and sacked him 7 times. It also was so terrible that it gave up 34 rushing yards on 38 attempts.

It's funny how you guys call "bad game plan" and "terrible A.I." on a team that was 8-0, is dominating their league, and will undoubtedly win the #1 seed in the Conference.

But, since you guys claim to have all the answers, explain this one:

Human QB
Hurried 2
Sacked 0
Bad Throw 1
Interceptions 2

CPU QB
Hurried 12
Sacked 7
Bad Throw 1
Interceptions 0


Clearly, the CPU QB is a fucking god.

Why doesn't anyone want to talk about turnovers? You know, the reason WHY the CPU team kept getting the ball in the red zone without even having to drive there.

Originally posted by cptafw163
I felt bad until C22 shat all over your DAI and OAI. the HB draw is a sorry ass play. I am an OC and that play is not even in my playbook.

I would also be wary of a CPU team that is HUMAN OWNED!!

That was the bad thing you did. It is not like a CPU team using the regular playbook. It was a CPU team with an OC and DC.

Bad gameplanning.

That HB Draw play got 9 yards. it was a good play. In fact, only 9.5 was needed for a Touchdown. Had the CPU players not been leveled so high that they can't miss tackles, that play would have been a TD.

And, I'm going to say it over and over again...

The D hurried the CPU QB 12 times, sacked him 7 times. Still, the QB only had 1 bad throw and had 0 interceptions.

That's not a case of a bad Defensive A.I., that's a case of a freak QB that is absolutely unflappable and, frankly, god damned amazing.

The CPU dots were just flat out at a higher level than the Human dots. The real question should be why.

Losing to CPU's is embarrassing.

Trying to blame the sim after losing to CPU's is embarrassing.

Bumping threads and reminding others that you lost to CPU's is embarrassing.

Fraud team is fraud.

Originally posted by johny_jordan
That HB Draw play got 9 yards. it was a good play. In fact, only 9.5 was needed for a Touchdown. Had the CPU players not been leveled so high that they can't miss tackles, that play would have been a TD.

And, I'm going to say it over and over again...

The D hurried the CPU QB 12 times, sacked him 7 times. Still, the QB only had 1 bad throw and had 0 interceptions.

That's not a case of a bad Defensive A.I., that's a case of a freak QB that is absolutely unflappable and, frankly, god damned amazing.

The CPU dots were just flat out at a higher level than the Human dots. The real question should be why.

This game definitely exposed holes in your defense. Instead of defending how great your team is, go back and look through that game and patch up the holes found in there. I assure you those holes are glaring when pointed out and EVERY coordinator at times has to re-visit his defense when a team exposes a weakness you didn't know was there.

I have had a pretty good run of success as a DC but there are definitely still times I shit the bed and in this game and with your defensive plays / schemes you called, there was definitely some bed shitting here.

Originally posted by Smith_FPS
This game definitely exposed holes in your defense. Instead of defending how great your team is, go back and look through that game and patch up the holes found in there. I assure you those holes are glaring when pointed out and EVERY coordinator at times has to re-visit his defense when a team exposes a weakness you didn't know was there.

I have had a pretty good run of success as a DC but there are definitely still times I shit the bed and in this game and with your defensive plays / schemes you called, there was definitely some bed shitting here.

Well, first off, that is absolutely not our normal scheme what-so-ever. It's something completely different that we haven't done against any other team.

That said, aside from that one play in over time (which absolutely has glaring holes... which is why its rarely ever used unless it's against a team that isn't even remotely close, LVL-wise and we can get away with using it), I don't see all these glaring holes people are talking about.

The CPU only had 2 drives in regulation where they actually went down the field and scored points. Every drive was stopped (almost all 3-and-outs) except one that started at the 30 in our own territory... which, come one, they only had to go 30 yards for a TD. Considering the fact that the CPU had 3 or 4 possessions starting in the red zone like thattt, giving up only 1 TD from it IS GOOD D.

So, people say, "Your D AI is terrible and got exposed LOL".... And I say, Really? My whole D A.I. got 'exposed' because the CPU scored 10 points off of 2 drives?

All their other points in regulation came from them getting the ball at the 9, the 30, and like the 20. Haha. C'mon, man.

Originally posted by johny_jordan
Originally posted by Rocdog21

Learn to game plan

You mean, scout and game plan against a team that doesn't ever do the same things because they only play up or down to their opponents?

So, for instance, if their QB has thrown, like, 6 INTs in 8 games, it should be a safe assumption that if my D gets 12 Hurries and 7 Sacks on him... we'll get some INTs too, right?

Didn't happen.

It has NOTHING to do with game planning, though. Thanks for trying.

This is why you lack gold gifs.

Originally posted by Smith_FPS
This game definitely exposed holes in your defense. Instead of defending how great your team is, go back and look through that game and patch up the holes found in there. I assure you those holes are glaring when pointed out and EVERY coordinator at times has to re-visit his defense when a team exposes a weakness you didn't know was there.

I have had a pretty good run of success as a DC but there are definitely still times I shit the bed and in this game and with your defensive plays / schemes you called, there was definitely some bed shitting here.

I revisit mine after every game.

Originally posted by Dr. E
I revisit mine after every game.



I do as well against every good opponent or if something bizarre happens

Originally posted by Rocdog21
This is why you lack gold gifs.



Yeah, and not the fact that I've been DC'ing this team for a season and a half.

You people and your assumptions.

Not only was that response by Catch-22 condescending and all that comes with that type of vibe....Who says you can't run a shotgun draw on 3rd and 9?


http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81b61dc4


I mean...It's not like that happened vs. one of the better scoring, yardage and tackling defenses in the NFL or anything....Oh wait...

Honest opinion for johny or anyone on that team: Let it go...You're just going to get more and more angry dealing with the higher ups or support in this game and it's not worth the time...They got one over on you...Expect more of these types of stupid instances and laugh when it happens. Just adhere to the phrase that has gotten me this far: "Yellow's Simphony: Working as expected."

Originally posted by johny_jordan
Yeah, and not the fact that I've been DC'ing this team for a season and a half.

You people and your assumptions.

I dont get whats funny? No need too assume anything. You have been playing this game for 3 years, or at least attempting to play it.