+1
kingjonb
offline
offline
c'mon GLB, you can add an option for scored based playcalling and pass long distance, but you can't add one for blitz % ? That's very disappointing. I don't know why this surprises me, tho.
kingjonb
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chysil
it would be nice, but might be a bit more than "casual" implies... but then again they did put it for spys
and now they have passing down long distance and score based playcalling. That's even less casual than blitz %
it would be nice, but might be a bit more than "casual" implies... but then again they did put it for spys
and now they have passing down long distance and score based playcalling. That's even less casual than blitz %
bigdogdch
offline
offline
Originally posted by kingjonb
We have the % QB spy for every position, but I'd like to see the same option for blitzes in the basic settings. Pretty simple explanation I think.
Amen brother.
We have the % QB spy for every position, but I'd like to see the same option for blitzes in the basic settings. Pretty simple explanation I think.
Amen brother.
CampPen33
offline
offline
I like the option to choose who to blitz in casual. Problem isn't who but when. Working it out so that all don't blitz in this play, etc. Say you have all of them set to blitz on certain percentages, who is to say they wont all blitz on that down? You can put a max on blitzers, but then which two go if more than one get rolled? The way it is now makes more sense because it will call appropriate plays, and for this to make more sense, you would need to add more variables. More variables equals regular league imo.
kingjonb
offline
offline
Originally posted by CampPen33
I like the option to choose who to blitz in casual. Problem isn't who but when. Working it out so that all don't blitz in this play, etc. Say you have all of them set to blitz on certain percentages, who is to say they wont all blitz on that down? You can put a max on blitzers, but then which two go if more than one get rolled? The way it is now makes more sense because it will call appropriate plays, and for this to make more sense, you would need to add more variables. More variables equals regular league imo.
I don't really see what you're trying to say. Right now there is just a generic % so if you have it set to blitz at all then when a blitz is called it could be only the ROLB blitzing or an engage 7. At least if you have blitz % option for every position then you can control who you want to blitz and how often. Maybe even add a blitz max # of players per play also. Simple solution imo.
I like the option to choose who to blitz in casual. Problem isn't who but when. Working it out so that all don't blitz in this play, etc. Say you have all of them set to blitz on certain percentages, who is to say they wont all blitz on that down? You can put a max on blitzers, but then which two go if more than one get rolled? The way it is now makes more sense because it will call appropriate plays, and for this to make more sense, you would need to add more variables. More variables equals regular league imo.
I don't really see what you're trying to say. Right now there is just a generic % so if you have it set to blitz at all then when a blitz is called it could be only the ROLB blitzing or an engage 7. At least if you have blitz % option for every position then you can control who you want to blitz and how often. Maybe even add a blitz max # of players per play also. Simple solution imo.
CampPen33
offline
offline
Okay, let me try and explain this better. Would you want the potential of a SS, FS, and CB all blitzing on the same play? No. A generic blanket percentage would leave the potential for that to happen. Okay, so you add in the limit of if this guy blitzes then not this guy... well you are venturing into what the AI does without the DPC.
kingjonb
offline
offline
Originally posted by CampPen33
Okay, let me try and explain this better. Would you want the potential of a SS, FS, and CB all blitzing on the same play? No. A generic blanket percentage would leave the potential for that to happen. Okay, so you add in the limit of if this guy blitzes then not this guy... well you are venturing into what the AI does without the DPC.
doesn't it already do that? Like I said earlier you already have the potential of blitzing those players as it is now, whether its a position you ever want to blitz or not. This is casual after all so if you're worried about blitzing the perfect combination in every situation then casual is not for you. With this if you don't want to blitz all 3 then put those positions to 0.
I'd just like to be able to blitz only the ROLB so a 3-4 would have a little more use in casual.
Okay, let me try and explain this better. Would you want the potential of a SS, FS, and CB all blitzing on the same play? No. A generic blanket percentage would leave the potential for that to happen. Okay, so you add in the limit of if this guy blitzes then not this guy... well you are venturing into what the AI does without the DPC.
doesn't it already do that? Like I said earlier you already have the potential of blitzing those players as it is now, whether its a position you ever want to blitz or not. This is casual after all so if you're worried about blitzing the perfect combination in every situation then casual is not for you. With this if you don't want to blitz all 3 then put those positions to 0.
I'd just like to be able to blitz only the ROLB so a 3-4 would have a little more use in casual.
Originally posted by kingjonb
doesn't it already do that? Like I said earlier you already have the potential of blitzing those players as it is now, whether its a position you ever want to blitz or not. This is casual after all so if you're worried about blitzing the perfect combination in every situation then casual is not for you. With this if you don't want to blitz all 3 then put those positions to 0.
I'd just like to be able to blitz only the ROLB so a 3-4 would have a little more use in casual.
Can we pick a side for HB's and FB's to pass block then? Nope, it has to be fair on both sides of the casual ball imo!
doesn't it already do that? Like I said earlier you already have the potential of blitzing those players as it is now, whether its a position you ever want to blitz or not. This is casual after all so if you're worried about blitzing the perfect combination in every situation then casual is not for you. With this if you don't want to blitz all 3 then put those positions to 0.
I'd just like to be able to blitz only the ROLB so a 3-4 would have a little more use in casual.
Can we pick a side for HB's and FB's to pass block then? Nope, it has to be fair on both sides of the casual ball imo!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.