Warrior General Games

Originally posted by David Stern
Probably less. The guys in their currently suck so bad at the game they don't even know what half of the suggestions are saying

So then different mods.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
So then different mods.

yes, people who actually understand the game. I think the selection process should be much stricter.

I also suggested to Catch that a similar style of sorting like the bug forum would be a good idea but he said suggestions is not his area

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Do we need more suggestions mods?

Probably.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Originally posted by David Stern

Probably less. The guys in their currently suck so bad at the game they don't even know what half of the suggestions are saying

So then different mods.

No, the ones in there are doing a fine job.Originally posted by Robbnva

I also suggested to Catch that a similar style of sorting like the bug forum would be a good idea but he said suggestions is not his area

It has been discussed, but most of the mods who work in Suggestions agree it would cause much more work than it's worth. Suggestions is much more discussion-dependent than bugs, and both already have a large duplicate thread problem. In Suggestions, it would get even worse as people don't check subforums. Additionally, it will lead to a much more niched set of people commenting on Suggestions, since someone who looks in one sub forum may not read another.

Originally posted by David Stern
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024

Do we need more suggestions mods?

Probably less. The guys in their currently suck so bad at the game they don't even know what half of the suggestions are saying

♥

Originally posted by David Stern
Probably less. The guys in their currently suck so bad at the game they don't even know what half of the suggestions are saying

especially knick

2 Q's


Is there going to be anymore testers pos. open?

Any more thoughts from bort on owning 2 or more minors teams?

Originally posted by Tim26
2 Q's


Is there going to be anymore testers pos. open?

Any more thoughts from bort on owning 2 or more minors teams?

Q1 - I am not a tester...but they did just add several of them. I would highly doubt any more will be taken on unless they drop someone currently testing.

Q2 - 7. What are some of the "smaller epic suggestions" Bort is trying to get done this offseason?

Ability to buy a second team, the contract related option mentioned above, flex point friendly bank, show play called on replay page for coordinator, and some other things. I have some other admin related tools and an update to our forum system to work with some new rules Pallow has been working on as well. - Bort

?2 not appropriate for this foum imo

how does one get an invite code to get into the test server?

PM me with answer if possible. id like to join in helping with test server. season 1 vet here.

Originally posted by R.Williams 34
how does one get an invite code to get into the test server?

PM me with answer if possible. id like to join in helping with test server. season 1 vet here.

They recently made an announcement - took applications - and selected some of those who applied.

Odds are - that will happen again SOMEDAY down the road when more testers are needed

Originally posted by TxSteve
They recently made an announcement - took applications - and selected some of those who applied.

Odds are - that will happen again SOMEDAY down the road when more testers are needed

rojer that thank ya.

Any sim changes coming this season? GLB public would like to know.

Thanks

Originally posted by Tigerbait0307
Any sim changes coming this season? GLB public would like to know.

Thanks


I would imagine that there will certainly be some changes, though nothing has yet been decided with any certainty.

I would say that the recurring thread of conversation has to do with making "secondary" attributes such as confidence and stamina (and possibly things like catching and tackling) more generally important.

Another point of discussion has been to broadly review SAs and possibly adjust them if they are found to not be working in a satisfactory manner (specifically targetting some of the SAs that many folks feel don't make much impact).

But it's all TBD as this point.

Originally posted by tautology

I would imagine that there will certainly be some changes, though nothing has yet been decided with any certainty.

I would say that the recurring thread of conversation has to do with making "secondary" attributes such as confidence and stamina (and possibly things like catching and tackling) more generally important.

Another point of discussion has been to broadly review SAs and possibly adjust them if they are found to not be working in a satisfactory manner (specifically targetting some of the SAs that many folks feel don't make much impact).

But it's all TBD as this point.





Adding to this - there has been some discussion regarding the blocking on outside run plays. Especially to the weak side.