User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Seric
and again, no one said no agility. All that was said was low agility. You don't need 68+ in agility for a pocket passer, when the SP that is used to get it from 61 or higher could definitely be used to better means in more important skills. While some people may have said it, it wasn't said in this thread, so to continually bring it up is redundant because you're not proving anyone wrong by saying it.


Originally posted by TJ Spikes
There is no "climbing the pocket". You want slow speed, low agility on a passer so that they can't move.



"So they can't move". You stand corrected
Edited by darncat on Aug 5, 2018 05:04:59
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by darncat
"So they can't move". You stand corrected


ACTUALLY READ THE QUOTE YOU QUOTED AND TRY AGAIN

I'll even be nice and BOLD and UNDERLINE the important part

Originally posted by TJ Spikes
You want slow speed, low agility on a passer so that they can't move



Please tell me where that say NO AGILITY. Go ahead, take your time. I'll wait.
Edited by Seric on Aug 5, 2018 14:22:04
Edited by Seric on Aug 5, 2018 14:21:43
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
If you're going to try to act like someone said something they didn't say, chose something that isn't so easy to show you're wrong. And you wonder why Lexden11 said you're one of the worst posters.
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Seric
Please tell me where that say NO AGILITY. Go ahead, take your time. I'll wait.


Its not possible to have NO agility, you start with at least 8 or so
TRY AGAIN TROLL
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
in any event, since you have absolutely nothing to say about the thread topic whatsoever
you can shut up and stop defending your multis
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
I have said plenty about the topic on hand. It's not my fault that what I have said was not something you wanted to hear because it was specifically calling you out for saying stuff that wasn't said. That doesn't make me a troll. The fact that you want to continually say things that were not said in this thread makes you more of the troll than anyone else.

Originally posted by darncat
No, you literally said it doesn't happen, and you are easily proven wrong. end of story.
On top of that you advised people to make their passing QBs with no agility, which is the worst advice of all time.
People, don't listen to that nonsense


Originally posted by darncat
don't listen to the hater tj stile or any of the other trolls
you can make a dual threat or any other type dot you want, its your player
what i'm pointing out, is that the ppl w/ experience making scrambling QBs will advise to start w/ the majors
on the other hand, the ppl that didn't know what to try, or never bothered to try at all, just want to whine
and tell you not to do it, for a whole host of mostly inaccurate reasons. do not listen to them at all
(and never, ever ever think a QB doesn't need agility at all)


Originally posted by darncat
I'd agree with this but add that without the right supporting dots, no player can be good, be it a crazy experimental
or a standard drop back passer. That being said, the typically run offenses and typical player builds lend themselves
to work with the normally built QBs, by and large. These typical offenses and players won't lend themselves necessarily
to a dual threat type QB system. You probably need very specific tactics and dots to make this work, and be very active,
because a set and forget offensive AI won't usually do the trick for this.

I'd like to point out that i personally feel nothing is fool proof, as i stated earlier, and this is certainly not.
Sometimes it can work a charm and other days not so much, just like anything else. I posted the links to those plays
simply to illustrate that what dude was saying is incorrect- QBs can move in the pocket, and can scramble;
whether or not this makes for an outstanding player is determined however by much more than that.
I'd also like to reiterate i think this goes beyond scrambling QBs: i've noticed it somewhat common the attitude
that pocket and drop back passers don't need agility at all. That would be a big mistake.



Highlighted the parts that I am talking about, just to make it easier for you slow moving brain to grasp.

So before you act like you're being trolled, you may want to look at what you post first. YOU'RE THE ONE who continually said NO AGILITY (trying to act like that's what TJ said, which is what prompted me to call you out). YOU'RE THE ONE who likes to act like people are saying things that they're not.

As for you're last comment (provided so there is absolutely no confusion)

Originally posted by darncat
in any event, since you have absolutely nothing to say about the thread topic whatsoever
you can shut up and stop defending your multis


You can go screw yourself with the wide end of a bat. I'll comment wherever and whenever I want. Just because I am calling you out for your own stupid comments, doesn't make me a troll nor does it mean I am defending my so called multis. Which I actually don't have. Probably can't say the same about you. All it means is you're a fool who makes it too easy to call out. If you would stop acting like people are saying things that they aren't, I'd have nothing to call you out on.
Edited by Seric on Aug 6, 2018 13:52:06
Edited by Seric on Aug 6, 2018 11:00:51
 
darncat
offline
Link
 
Tldr

stop whining you dumb hillbilly crybaby
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Typical response from someone who refuses to admit they were wrong. It's ok, we all know you're too stupid to grasp logic.
 
Ace
Moderator
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Farlig
WL championship dual threat QB says otherwise: http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4656937

Can it work? Yes, but it takes the right OC.


Originally posted by Farlig
Well, there was the original one who has a gold WL trophy as well:

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4598618

It’s a conceptual issue and knowing when and how to use them more than a can you build a productive on issue.


This
 
thermon
online
Link
 
Originally posted by Ace
This


... You mean like 1 out of a 100?

More like 1 out of a million.

So you're telling me there's a chance...?! YEAH!!!!!
Edited by thermon on Aug 7, 2018 20:29:26
 
TJ Spikes
online
Link
 
Originally posted by thermon
... You mean like 1 out of a 100?

More like 1 out of a million.

So you're telling me there's a chance...?! YEAH!!!!!


https://youtu.be/KX5jNnDMfxA
 
Tomcic
OC/DC Guru
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Farlig
WL championship dual threat QB says otherwise: http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/player.pl?player_id=4656937

Can it work? Yes, but it takes the right OC.


good dot
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.