Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Seth99
and scared of you, Barney? don't flatter yourself.

Coming from the guy, who just said this:

Originally posted by Seth99
once again, I am willing to admit when I was wrong. I posted before I had seen the vid footage. (which I saw before you posted it here). and honestly, I'm not 100% sure what to think after viewing it. I don't know that emptying their clips was reasonable, but it is possibly reasonable to expect a threat from someone who has been literally hopping fences to get away.

I admittedly jumped the gun on this one before watching footage. that's my bad.

My question is Seth, Why would you jump the gun, just for this thread? Just for an opportunity to poke at me?

Why did you call me out in your OP Seth, out of the clear blue sky?

For someone, who is constantly calling me stupid, uniformed and an idiot, doesn't this seem very idiotic of you my friend? Isn't this very thread of yours, the exact same thing you used to rail on @taurran about and defend me over? The very guy you just said you missed?

Maybe i am stupid and an idiot Seth. But I remember a time, you stood up for character and what's decent. Yet you admittingly, call me out, for what?

Thinking it's an opportunity for you? to do what Seth? Without even caring enough to at least watch the video's and be better informed, before you try to make me look like a stupid idiot?

This liberal cool guy, that you now want to be so bad, that you would jump at a chance to mention, little, ole' humble me in your OP, IS NOT the guy I used to know for sure.

While, we don't agree politically on many things, you were never like them Seth. Now, I guess you are? I guess it's been a goal of yours for some time now and an accomplishment you can be proud of?

so I guess your right. i am just stupid enough and foolish enough, to stand, even if on my own, for decent, good character and what's right.

Congrats Seth, you have arrived. You are now, just like them.

Originally posted by PopeCatXVI
but concerning your "liberal vermin" comment, what should we make of an alleged officer who dehumanizes certain people based solely on their political leanings?

"We?" I just assumed you already knew i was talking about you? Of course...

Originally posted by Sooner_Nation
so I guess your right. i am just stupid enough and foolish enough, to stand, even if on my own, for decent, good character and what's right

aka killing unarmed nonviolent civilians

I mean, I'm fine saying it's a pretty gray area here, but let's not act like these "heroes" were doing God's work.

RIP Arnaud Beltrame

I 'called you out' because while I and several others would look to get more information, you would side with the cops every time. every. single. time.
if being 'one of them' means that I am nothing like you, then I revel in that.

Originally posted by Seth99
I 'called you out' because while I and several others would look to get more information,

Aren't you a bundled mess of contradiction...

Originally posted by Seth99
I was wrong. I posted before I had seen the vid footage.


Originally posted by Seth99
I admittedly jumped the gun on this one before watching footage.

So which is it? Do you look for more information? Or do you jump the gun without even looking and attempt to create a false narrative? Because, your quotes above show, you can't make up your mind and are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

Kinda wishy, washy if you ask me.

And what's with this "I and several others?" You always now, seem desperately in need to join yourself with others for approval? It's clear to me by your above and past contradictions, along with your need to "have approval from others" you only created this thread hoping to create indifference with me, to gain their approval.

What other reason could there be when you admit "you jumped the gun" and then try and defend yourself in your next breath by saying, "I and others, try and look for more information? Are you full of shit or what?

Originally posted by Seth99
you would side with the cops every time. every. single. time.

I guess in order to have issue with me, you have to say this and purposefully glaze over the fact, that I have never once, or will ever in the future, defend or condemn a police shooting, in it's preliminary investigation. I might ask certain questions about some of the known circumstances, but I don't come to premature conclusions or create false narratives.

I knew another guy here a while back, who was the exact same way.

Originally posted by Seth99
depends. the article states it's 'unclear' as to whether the kid pointed it at them or made other threatening gestures. If he did anything like that, it's tough to fault the cops.

A few of my favorites:


Originally posted by Seth99
you're right about one thing, though, that someone in this thread is in need of 'growing up.'
(hint: it's YOU)

In these two posts, you were talking to the guy you miss so much.


Originally posted by Seth99
sometimes people use hyperbole and exaggerations to make a point. you might want to remember that.


Originally posted by Seth99
All I am saying is that I am not so quick to judge them guilty based upon what we have here for evidence.
You, however, have been ready in every example in this thread, to immediately form a lynch mob and string them up. That is very interesting considering how many times in the past you have chastised others for being so quick to make a judgement based upon shitty information.

Originally posted by Seth99
The very fact that you 'dare someone to make excuses' shows that you are assuming guilt on the part of the cops. otherwise, what is there to make an excuse for?

please tell me what excuse I have made for anyone there? I simply said that I don't have enough information to judge them guilty. that's not an excuse. that's saying I don't have enough information to judge anything.


Originally posted by Seth99
Exactly my point. we know none of this, yet you are willing to automatically assume guilt. why?

And last but not least. My personal favorite:


Originally posted by Seth99
oh, really, please, find me one instance in this thread where I have defended any violent action by the police.
just one. and stating I need more info before making a judgement is not defending, chuckles, so don't try that.
so, one find me just one instance of me defending or arguing for a violent one.





Originally posted by Seth99
If being 'one of them' means that I am nothing like you, then I revel in that.

Well, I certainly won't hold it against you, not wanting to be like me. But if calling me out for no reason, on an incident that you haven't even looked into, and then say you always look into things?

Sounds like hypocrisy to me.

Defending me against those same liberal, false narrative cop haters in the Poilice State thread and then attempting to be just like them here and doing the exact same thing with your OP now? When you used to defend against such bullshit nonsense?

Again, sounds like, the typical, socialist, liberal hypocrisy to me.

I'm ok with you downgrading your character, just to be like them if you are. But you can do that on your own. You don't have to try and use me, to gain brownie points with them and then look stupid, having to admit your wrong, for wanting to fit in with them so bad, that you actually jumped the gun in creating a thread that you didn't even do any background on? And then admitting the same damn things that I have always and only admitted to? And actually agreed with you on in the past?


Originally posted by Seth99
and honestly, I'm not 100% sure what to think after viewing it. I don't know that emptying their clips was reasonable, but it is possibly reasonable to expect a threat from someone who has been literally hopping fences to get away.

And I'll say it again for the record, even though I have said it a hundred times in the past over the years. If the final investigation shows, that the white officer and the black officer, intentionally and with malice, used deadly force on an unarmed man, who wasn't doing anything to promote or cause an unjustified conclusion of the incident, I will absolutely condemn the officers and their actions and expect them to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

If the final investigation shows, the white and the black officer came to their final conclusion of the incident and was justified in using deadly force, because his actions promoted and caused the belief for deadly force, I will absolutely defend the officers and their actions and expect them to be cleared and fully exonerated.

Originally posted by Corndog
I mean, I'm fine saying it's a pretty gray area here, but let's not act like these "heroes" were doing God's work.

Link?

hello sooner, do you have any additional thoughts about people who can't admit when they're wrong?

and please speak clearly into the microphone.

Originally posted by Catullus16
hello sooner, do you have any additional thoughts about people who can't admit when they're wrong?

and please speak clearly into the microphone.


Mexico is going to pay for it.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/31/stephon-clarks-independent-autopsy-results-reveal-was-shot-8-times-official-says.html

shot at 20 times. hit 8. seven in the back.

Originally posted by Venkman
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/31/stephon-clarks-independent-autopsy-results-reveal-was-shot-8-times-official-says.html

shot at 20 times. hit 8. seven in the back.

Evidence tampering for the win!

Originally posted by F00tballJunkie
Evidence tampering for the win!

any actual links to prove that? or just being a stupid partisan douche?

Originally posted by Venkman
any actual links to prove that? or just being a stupid partisan douche?

Proof is covered up. It will be many years till the truth comes out.

so, stupid partisan douche, then.
thanks for clarifying.