Does Technique Man take into account Clutch/Pass Rusher/Pass Blocker firing? Or is it just pure agility (w/ EQ) vs agility (w/ EQ)?
Originally posted by AngryDragon
The bugs mods have been directing everybody to the suggestions forum when they rule that the post is not a bug. Is there any chance that an admin can check the suggestions forum from time to time?
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
The bugs mods have been directing everybody to the suggestions forum when they rule that the post is not a bug. Is there any chance that an admin can check the suggestions forum from time to time?
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
Originally posted by Redrover
Does Technique Man take into account Clutch/Pass Rusher/Pass Blocker firing? Or is it just pure agility (w/ EQ) vs agility (w/ EQ)?
It's just pure stats.
Does Technique Man take into account Clutch/Pass Rusher/Pass Blocker firing? Or is it just pure agility (w/ EQ) vs agility (w/ EQ)?
It's just pure stats.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
5STAR
offline
offline
Any talk on ranking teams in leagues next season then breaking them into conferences so we don't end up with a super conference like in WL Zeta?
Catch22
offline
offline
Originally posted by mdm2272
is there any thought to forcing a create date for cap 4 like in pee-wee
Is there really a need? If they are under level 4, they can sign in the league.
is there any thought to forcing a create date for cap 4 like in pee-wee
Is there really a need? If they are under level 4, they can sign in the league.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by 5STAR
Any talk on ranking teams in leagues next season then breaking them into conferences so we don't end up with a super conference like in WL Zeta?
Maybe they should use Nib's system to make the conferences?
Any talk on ranking teams in leagues next season then breaking them into conferences so we don't end up with a super conference like in WL Zeta?
Maybe they should use Nib's system to make the conferences?
ijg
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
One other suggestion (pun intended ) is subforums for suggestions by general topic, i.e. AI related, player related, user interface related, etc.
We just discussed that today. The suggestion forum is most likely going to be changed to a big list with a voting/comment system instead, where we can sort the suggestions by votes. It's just too hard to sort through right now and find the things that large majorities of people are really interested in. We need a more directed process overall.
One other suggestion (pun intended ) is subforums for suggestions by general topic, i.e. AI related, player related, user interface related, etc.
Originally posted by Ivanhoe1
It might not have been meant but it effectively acts like one since you have to double up on a SA at the end of an Ability Tree that only works half the time in the 3-4. It makes using the 3-4 prohibitive when managing energy since there is a significant drop off compared to the 4-3 when using the General series on defense during the course of a game (the General SA is the best in my opinion). Half the NFL is using the 3-4 now .
Any chance of bringing this in line (the 3-4 formation) with the other General series, in needing only one position to gain full benefit in all formations?
How bout if it were to just pick the guy with the highest skill between the two?
It might not have been meant but it effectively acts like one since you have to double up on a SA at the end of an Ability Tree that only works half the time in the 3-4. It makes using the 3-4 prohibitive when managing energy since there is a significant drop off compared to the 4-3 when using the General series on defense during the course of a game (the General SA is the best in my opinion). Half the NFL is using the 3-4 now .
Any chance of bringing this in line (the 3-4 formation) with the other General series, in needing only one position to gain full benefit in all formations?
How bout if it were to just pick the guy with the highest skill between the two?
Last question and 2 suggestions by me:
Suggestions:
1. Can we get an "Auto VA" Option identical to the Choose Auto Training Option implemented? Updating 40 builds VA's manually is tedious.
2. Can we get a BT total listed per build in the "Quick Training Editor" list? Put it right under the Training Points
Question:
Why can i not scout my own teams game in a game that is labelled "Results are viewable by the participants only"?
I own the team, i can see the box score, the game summary but i can't pick the private match-up in the Scout tool for my own team that played them?
Thanks.
Suggestions:
1. Can we get an "Auto VA" Option identical to the Choose Auto Training Option implemented? Updating 40 builds VA's manually is tedious.
2. Can we get a BT total listed per build in the "Quick Training Editor" list? Put it right under the Training Points
Question:
Why can i not scout my own teams game in a game that is labelled "Results are viewable by the participants only"?
I own the team, i can see the box score, the game summary but i can't pick the private match-up in the Scout tool for my own team that played them?
Thanks.
Catch22
offline
offline
Originally posted by 5STAR
Any talk on ranking teams in leagues next season then breaking them into conferences so we don't end up with a super conference like in WL Zeta?
No, it's going to remain random draw.
Any talk on ranking teams in leagues next season then breaking them into conferences so we don't end up with a super conference like in WL Zeta?
No, it's going to remain random draw.
AngryDragon
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bort
How bout if it were to just pick the guy with the highest skill between the two?
+1
How bout if it were to just pick the guy with the highest skill between the two?
+1
Originally posted by F8n4tune
Is the new CTB team thing a nightly rollover process ? Like every 3 days from the time of sell back ? Hope this makes sense ?
Yes, the reset process is at rollover.
Is the new CTB team thing a nightly rollover process ? Like every 3 days from the time of sell back ? Hope this makes sense ?
Yes, the reset process is at rollover.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.