Warrior General Games

Tweetys' Nomination will follow shortly.

This is the GM of the Colonels and we were just informed of this Pro Bowl voting. Great idea but looking at the list above and the fact there is not a single Colonel on it makes me wonder. I definately think some of our guys are worthy of consideration. I also think if you are going to name it "Pro Bowl" then you would have 2 at every position with possible total team of 52 players. You would have a starter based on the most votes cast and a back up. If you really wanted to be cute you would make it 56 players and after taking the top 52 allow the remaining 4 slots to be filled with the top vote getters regardless of position as alternates. You have your 11 offense, 11 defense, K, P, KR, PR x starter and backup =52.

As for who should vote, it should be the team owners only, in my opinion. Too big a task to allow the masses do it.

Who should be nominated? Well, to avoid upsetting team members how about how I approached it on our teams forum. Again, this was before I saw this post and our PR guy made it out like everyone would be voting. But one criteria you could use is the guy being nominated must be in the top 5 for his position in some catogory within the conference player standing to qualify. This means the top 5 kickers in %, PTS, etc. If your guy is statistically in the top five then he should be worthy consideration. I did this in posting on our forum whom I thought was worthy of consideration and I came up with 10 players with one player qualifying for two catogories.

Make it where the owners can not vote for anyone on their individual team, submit to the person that wants the task and post the results. If you have a tie at any position, you have the 4 alternate spots you can use and if it is to decide who is the starter verses back up, use some predetermined method to decide each position. Defensive, tie breaker is total number of tackles. If its offensive, total # of yards, pancakes. If its Kickers, total points scored or highest punt average. There shouldn't be a need for more than something like that on tie breakers. That's my vote.

Originally posted by blevstone
Haiphong Hitmen nominations:

QB: Sammy Baugh - 293-477 (61.4%), 2580.5 yds, 14 TDs and 4 INTs - 82.1 QB rating
RB: Chief Brighthorse - 318 carries, 1675.5 yds (5.3 ypc), 22 TDs; 26 rec, 135 yds, 4 TDs
WR: Roanoke Maxwell - 71 rec, 842 yds, and 9 TDs
C: Kratos ! - 51 pancakes
OT: Mister Stonecrusher - 69 pancakes
OT: Booker Mays - 82 pancakes

DE: Bubb Rubb - 35 tackles, 4 sacks, 3 PD
LB: Nick Obert - 29 tackles, 1 sack, 1 FF, 4 PD
LB: Jacob McCandles - 40 tackles, 2 INT, 5 PD
CB: Brian Gray - 45 tackles, 4 INT, 1 FF, 21 PD
FS: Sean Turner - 37 tackles, 2 INT, 3 FF, 18 PD
SS: Morgan Kennedy - 56 tackles, 2 INT, 2 FF, 11 PD

I like how this guy presented his teammates as it would be easy to look at these figures to help determine a guys merit. But I know our owner would take into account how much we might have had to game plan against someone on a particular team to help him decide his final vote. Vote for one guy per position. So you would want to list ROLB verse LOLB and so on.

Originally posted by chitownrolltide
This is the GM of the Colonels and we were just informed of this Pro Bowl voting. Great idea but looking at the list above and the fact there is not a single Colonel on it makes me wonder. I definately think some of our guys are worthy of consideration. I also think if you are going to name it "Pro Bowl" then you would have 2 at every position with possible total team of 52 players. You would have a starter based on the most votes cast and a back up. If you really wanted to be cute you would make it 56 players and after taking the top 52 allow the remaining 4 slots to be filled with the top vote getters regardless of position as alternates. You have your 11 offense, 11 defense, K, P, KR, PR x starter and backup =52.

As for who should vote, it should be the team owners only, in my opinion. Too big a task to allow the masses do it.

Who should be nominated? Well, to avoid upsetting team members how about how I approached it on our teams forum. Again, this was before I saw this post and our PR guy made it out like everyone would be voting. But one criteria you could use is the guy being nominated must be in the top 5 for his position in some catogory within the conference player standing to qualify. This means the top 5 kickers in %, PTS, etc. If your guy is statistically in the top five then he should be worthy consideration. I did this in posting on our forum whom I thought was worthy of consideration and I came up with 10 players with one player qualifying for two catogories.

Make it where the owners can not vote for anyone on their individual team, submit to the person that wants the task and post the results. If you have a tie at any position, you have the 4 alternate spots you can use and if it is to decide who is the starter verses back up, use some predetermined method to decide each position. Defensive, tie breaker is total number of tackles. If its offensive, total # of yards, pancakes. If its Kickers, total points scored or highest punt average. There shouldn't be a need for more than something like that on tie breakers. That's my vote.

If you guys haven't nominated your players then there wouldn't be anyone from the Colonels on the "list" so far...that's kind of the idea, you nominate your guys and they are added to the list.

Well, there is still one game left tomorrow and we will submit to our owner to decide whom should be nominated. Then its up to whomever to decide as there really isn't going to be any reward like a trip to Hawaii or anything, just league recognition perhaps. We'd rather win it on the field anyway but we'll pass it on to our owner to decide what he wants to do.

I think you're missing the point dude, you are supposed to nominate your own players. You're acting like the Colonels got snubbed. The only people that have snubbed them is yourselves...

Bangkok Tweetys proudly nominates the following :

QB : Jerry Ou QB Rating 87.7 297-440 (67.5%) 2,601 Yds. 20 TD 11 Int
FB : Bill Floyd 3 TD 3 pancakes
OT : Ple in Thailand 105 pancakes
OT : Ty Hulk 63 pancakes, no sack conceded
C : Crazy Whale 95 pancakes (as a backup C) avg. 1 pancake every 5.22 plays
G : Climate Change 80 pancakes avg. 1 pancake every 6.9 plays

DE : Haufu Gurugatuppa 12 sacks 14 hurries 55 tackles 2PD
DE : Boomy Zabransky 5 sacks 29 hurries 44 tackles 4 PD
CB : Tony Scofield 6 ints 37 PD 68 tackles 3 FFum
CB : Winne Tzameti 7 ints 29 PD 45 tackles 2 Fum Rec

KR : dimmy finster 26 KR 865 yds. (avg. 33.3)
PR : dimmy finster 98 PR 1838 yds. (avg. 18.8) 4 TD

One of the other leagues also nominate this:

Originally posted by The Rut, USA AAA#1
Nominations :

League MVP (Alpha & Zeta)

Individual Conference Awards:

Offensive Player of the Year
Alpha:
Zeta:

Defensive Player of the Year
West:
East:

Coach of Year
Alpha:
Zeta:

Most Improved Team
Alpha:
Zeta:


Thought it could be fun to vote this too. What are your thoughts?

Why is something so simple made so hard lol.

Also, that's a good idea Kknutzen.

I also would like to nominate from the Battlers..

FB Seth Bullock....11 pancakes, 3 TDs, 3.8 rush yrd ave, 2.8 rec yrd ave.

Thurman Murman from Kunming, leads league in pancakes

Originally posted by JerryOu
Bangkok Tweetys proudly nominates the following :

QB : Jerry Ou QB Rating 87.7 297-440 (67.5%) 2,601 Yds. 20 TD 11 Int
FB : Bill Floyd 3 TD 3 pancakes
OT : Ple in Thailand 105 pancakes
OT : Ty Hulk 63 pancakes, no sack conceded
C : Crazy Whale 95 pancakes (as a backup C) avg. 1 pancake every 5.22 plays
G : Climate Change 80 pancakes avg. 1 pancake every 6.9 plays

DE : Haufu Gurugatuppa 12 sacks 14 hurries 55 tackles 2PD
DE : Boomy Zabransky 5 sacks 29 hurries 44 tackles 4 PD
CB : Tony Scofield 6 ints 37 PD 68 tackles 3 FFum
CB : Winne Tzameti 7 ints 29 PD 45 tackles 2 Fum Rec

KR : dimmy finster 26 KR 865 yds. (avg. 33.3)
PR : dimmy finster 98 PR 1838 yds. (avg. 18.8) 4 TD


The Tweetys are terrible...you must be delusional to think they'll get anyone into the Pro Bowl

I will be glad if we have no Pro Bowl players but win the championship.

Hope we meet you again in the playoffs, blevstone.

My voting for Alpha Conference
QB - Jim Zorn (Bangkok)
HB - Clinton Portis (Taiwan)
FB - Jacobim Mugatu (Kunming)
WR - Michael Westbrook (Taiwan)
WR - Randy Moss #81 (New England)
TE - Aaron Douglas (Kunming)
OT - Senor Keyore (Kunming)
OT - Walter Pancake Jones (Bangkok)
G - Wes Walls (Taiwan)
G - Reggie Evans (Bangkok)
C - Thurman Murman (Kunming)
DT - Hammond Eggs (Phuket)
DT - Tubbo Lard (Phuket)
DE - Jarvis Green #97 (New England)
DE - Omar Abdel Raman (Phuket)
LB - Michael Talarski (Kunming)
LB - Vladmir Misfit (Radford)
LB - Teddy KGB (Xi'an)
CB - Spungebob Squarepants (Taiwan)
CB - Kelly Bojangles Bojangles (Bangkok)
FS - Trolamalu Poy (Bangkok)
SS - Michael Boulware (Bangkok)
K - Matt Bailey (Big Dick)
P - Will Punt for Rasterbation (Big Dick)
KR - Wallace Sevin (Xi'an)
PR - Kevin Faulk #33 (New England)

i believe chitown is talking about the ORIGINAL LIST. The one that the person who started this topic posted. IN that case, no one from the colonels in on there. That's all he's saying, obviously if we haven't posted ours no one is nominated yet.