why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
Forum > Test Server Discussion > Tester disclosure thread
Phantom_Opera
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
Faux Bear
offline
offline
Originally posted by jamz
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Bukowski
offline
offline
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by jamz
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Sounds like something a tester would say, tbh.
Add his name to the list!
Originally posted by jamz
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Sounds like something a tester would say, tbh.
Add his name to the list!
Phantom_Opera
offline
offline
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by jamz
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Yeah we kinda figured that, You will prolly get in with them then. So the testers are just testing for advantage for a small group? This is good for GLB how?
Originally posted by jamz
Originally posted by Faux Bear
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
Stop the cheating accusations or they'll never post in here tbh.
You're the only one calling them cheaters. The OP certainly didn't.
I'm just saying, it's time to show your hand fellas.
you compared a non-disclosing tester to Barry Bonds, and a disclosing tester to Jason Giambi/Jose Canseco...and I'm the one that's accusing them of cheating?
frankly, I don't think that they're cheaters whether they disclose information publicly or not.
but I do think that you're right in that none of them are likely to post in this thread. And if I were a tester I wouldn't either.
Yeah we kinda figured that, You will prolly get in with them then. So the testers are just testing for advantage for a small group? This is good for GLB how?
Domer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
This thread could be good. I am hopeful.
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
What's the difference how it comes off?
The testers constantly say that they're willing to help, but for some reason they don't.
Here is a very specific thread, requesting their help. Now we can see if they are true to their word.
I've gotten plenty of help from testers myself.
Domer
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
This thread could be good. I am hopeful.
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
What's the difference how it comes off?
The testers constantly say that they're willing to help, but for some reason they don't.
Here is a very specific thread, requesting their help. Now we can see if they are true to their word.
I've gotten plenty of help from testers myself.
Domer
jamz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Faux Bear
...
This thread offers them redemption, and the love and acceptance of their peers.
Why should they shun the chance to help the general populace, if that is indeed their purpose as a tester.
I keep seeing this BS line of "If you want to know something just PM me"
That's not disclosure, this is.
Let the dissemination of information begin here, and spread unto the common unboosting man.
Are not all GLBers created equal?
...
This thread offers them redemption, and the love and acceptance of their peers.
Why should they shun the chance to help the general populace, if that is indeed their purpose as a tester.
I keep seeing this BS line of "If you want to know something just PM me"
That's not disclosure, this is.
Let the dissemination of information begin here, and spread unto the common unboosting man.
Are not all GLBers created equal?
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phantom_Opera
Originally posted by Robbnva
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
your HB sucks and my LB build doesn't miss tackles yet nobody listens to me
Originally posted by Robbnva
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
your HB sucks and my LB build doesn't miss tackles yet nobody listens to me
Bukowski
offline
offline
Originally posted by Domer
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
This thread could be good. I am hopeful.
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
What's the difference how it comes off?
The testers constantly say that they're willing to help, but for some reason they don't.
Here is a very specific thread, requesting their help. Now we can see if they are true to their word.
I've gotten plenty of help from testers myself.
Domer
Yeah, because they pick and choose who they give the information out to, which is bullshit.
How did they decide to give info to you?
if they're passing out any info at all, it should be made public for everyone to see.
I think you just proved our point.
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by Faux Bear
Originally posted by Bukowski
Originally posted by phthalatemagic
This thread could be good. I am hopeful.
you're kidding right?
the idea of the thread is a good one, but the way it was framed - "tell us or we'll assume you're a cheater!" - is off-putting and unlikely to make anyone want to disclose anything.
What's the difference how it comes off?
The testers constantly say that they're willing to help, but for some reason they don't.
Here is a very specific thread, requesting their help. Now we can see if they are true to their word.
I've gotten plenty of help from testers myself.
Domer
Yeah, because they pick and choose who they give the information out to, which is bullshit.
How did they decide to give info to you?
if they're passing out any info at all, it should be made public for everyone to see.
I think you just proved our point.
Phantom_Opera
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
Originally posted by Phantom_Opera
Originally posted by Robbnva
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
your HB sucks and my LB build doesn't miss tackles yet nobody listens to me
What the Hell, you tested my HB and didn't tell me.
Originally posted by Phantom_Opera
Originally posted by Robbnva
why is my name not on that list, I am a tester
What are the results of the testing Rob.
your HB sucks and my LB build doesn't miss tackles yet nobody listens to me
What the Hell, you tested my HB and didn't tell me.
We are waiting for bort to come up with a format for revealing the results and then we will start a blog. I am a tester and even I could barely navigate through the links he has up at present. My understanding is that it is a moderate priority for him right now - higher was getting the season started and now he is trying to sort through problems with endorsements.
Bukowski
offline
offline
Originally posted by tpaterniti
We are waiting for bort to come up with a format for revealing the results and then we will start a blog.
Then why are testers giving information out to certain people, but not others?
How is that appropriate?
We are waiting for bort to come up with a format for revealing the results and then we will start a blog.
Then why are testers giving information out to certain people, but not others?
How is that appropriate?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
