GET HER DONE!!!!
oronis
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dolphan9954
basically. DT to DE and DE to OLB should have no out of position penalty
Ok, you are thinking about going from a 4-3 to a 3-4, and being able to better use your roster.
Some teams employ a 3-4 already. You would have to make sure the reverse of what you said is still applicable, so that teams that run a 3-4 now could also situationally use a 4-3.
So, would you think it would be okay for an LB to play at a DE slot in a 4-3 without penalty? How about DEs in the DT slot on 4-3s?
basically. DT to DE and DE to OLB should have no out of position penalty
Ok, you are thinking about going from a 4-3 to a 3-4, and being able to better use your roster.
Some teams employ a 3-4 already. You would have to make sure the reverse of what you said is still applicable, so that teams that run a 3-4 now could also situationally use a 4-3.
So, would you think it would be okay for an LB to play at a DE slot in a 4-3 without penalty? How about DEs in the DT slot on 4-3s?
Tmracht
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dolphan9954
I play a hybrid 3-4 4-3 defense, and it would make the 3-4 at least usable to more teams, and have a point of having the formation if teams could sub DTs in at DE for the 3-4.
Similar situation for me so I'm all for it.
I play a hybrid 3-4 4-3 defense, and it would make the 3-4 at least usable to more teams, and have a point of having the formation if teams could sub DTs in at DE for the 3-4.
Similar situation for me so I'm all for it.
BDIrish79
offline
offline
Outstanding idea...Give us a fair playing field versus the offense!! We work just as hard(probably harder) and spend the same amount of money, so allow us the same abilities that are given to offenses!
w_alloy
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jagmind
This should've been put in once the advanced AI became available. +1
This should've been put in once the advanced AI became available. +1
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.