User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Wise's GLB Pro - WK7 Network/Independent Rankings
Page:
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Better players running our system we built for. Cool story.


Your roster is insanely flawed, you've heard of blockers before, right? It's like you guys made a pass attack roster but then realized that you couldn't even do that right, so now you are stuck with no running game and all you can do is pass to the FB. Do you really think this is going to win games against active DC's? Half the networks aren't even game planning yet. You see what happened when you came to Dayton, and you speak often of how inferior we are. Wait til a motivated quality DC gets ahold of you.

#nopromo

 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Lolthinking they arent gameplanning already
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Not everyone is in your special olympics cupcake conference on cruise control. Most teams have win just to qualify for WL
 
POOPERDOG7
offline
Link
 
Lots of love in this place
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Exclude a team you OC? Clearly I know you throw the ball. Not shade at you. Kenshinzen acts like KC isnt at top or near it passing trying to troll


I'm not saying I'm a better passing OC than KC's OC (even though I am, but it's not what I was saying).

What I was saying is that Sno is a better passing team than KC Playmakers, which is clearly the case and has nothing to do with TSW.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Clearly except behind Playmakers in passing yards
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
My prediction was old news anyways. KC leading both pro leagues in passing. Nuff said
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=21688

More clear evidence wise is superior
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by POOPERDOG7
Lots of love in this place


Just a bunch of hypocrite wannabe trolls
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Clearly except behind Playmakers in passing yards


You are aware that y/a, td/int, and pts matter, yes?
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=21688

More clear evidence wise is superior


I mean, props to you guys for winning that game. Legit.

But... Sample size? I have quite a few top WL offenses on my lolresume. If RC or Tomcic want to talk shit to me as an OC that's fine since they have rings, but lol at you.
Edited by WiSeIVIaN on Jan 26, 2024 17:06:00
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
lol at me too
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
My prediction was old news anyways. KC leading both pro leagues in passing. Nuff said


That means nothing when you can't win games. Our offense use passing to move the ball because don't like the run/run/run approach but this doesn't mean we don't have a run game like your team. Also we pass to every receiver available, not only inside route to FB/HB.

Btw don't know why I respond to you because you're just a forum troll and don't OC anything or do something else to the team. I'll put you again in ignore list and spend my time somewhere else.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
I mean, props to you guys for winning that game. Legit.

But... Sample size? I have quite a few top WL offenses on my lolresume. If RC or Tomcic want to talk shit to me as an OC that's fine since they have rings, but lol at you.


ive never seen Sno in WL.
 
PLAYMAKERS
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
That means nothing when you can't win games. Our offense use passing to move the ball because don't like the run/run/run approach but this doesn't mean we don't have a run game like your team. Also we pass to every receiver available, not only inside route to FB/HB.

Btw don't know why I respond to you because you're just a forum troll and don't OC anything or do something else to the team. I'll put you again in ignore list and spend my time somewhere else.


cant win games?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.