User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Newbie Help > Target Carrying for a KR PR at Nat Pro level?
Page:
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Target Carrying for a KR PR at Nat Pro level?

Keep having fumbles on ST play. Seems like a good build, ST team is usually keeping tacklers to minimum.

Getting frustated.
 
ProfessionalKop
Gangstalicious
offline
Link
 
i think most guys go for high 80s-low 90s
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
77-cap it and it ends up mid 80's
 
slashxtreme
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
90
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Okay thats not the problem.

How about strength?
 
Robbnva
offline
Link
 
minimum of 60 strength
 
oaklandraider
OAK
offline
Link
 
its also about your blocking .... if the coverage team get full speed hits on him, then fumbling will be much more likely ...
Id say 85 minimum
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Robbnva
minimum of 68 strength


fyp
 
reddogrw
HOOD
offline
Link
 
and your returner should ONLY be the KR and PR and nowhere else on the depth chart - 60 stamina as well - tired players fumble more
 
Robbnva
offline
Link
 
Agree with both posts from red. The old rob would never do that
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Thanks.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Returners are the only position where it makes sense to have one piece of avoid fumble AEQ as well.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by reddogrw
Originally posted by Robbnva

minimum of 68 strength


fyp


This is the biggie. A good break tackle roll is a returner's best friend against avoiding fumbles.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
This is the biggie. A good break tackle roll is a returner's best friend against avoiding fumbles.

I'm not sure that's true. Didn't someone compile some evidence suggesting that fumbles are more common immediately following a broken tackle?
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by Mat McBriar

This is the biggie. A good break tackle roll is a returner's best friend against avoiding fumbles.

I'm not sure that's true. Didn't someone compile some evidence suggesting that fumbles are more common immediately following a broken tackle?


I mean I guess there's going to be a slight dip in energy, which can leave you more susceptible, but overall it's a big boon. You'd be crazy to take 30 strength or something because you feel breaking tackles is going to hurt your returner.

It's simple (and you can find a few Bort quotes backing this up): not all tackles get fumble rolls. Defenders only get a fumble roll vs not fumble roll interaction when their tackle attempt meets the required 'quality' threshold.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.