i only OC so -1
Forum > Suggestions > Mass Tagging for O-line/WR
regnac
offline
offline
Originally posted by ninja turtles
same thing here. good thing i read through suggestions before making my own.
+1
my thought was just to have all the o-line default to 'blocker' and all the WR's default to 'receiver'....then have the option to change if you want
+1 but I really don't see why they added tagging to these positions to begin with
same thing here. good thing i read through suggestions before making my own.
+1
my thought was just to have all the o-line default to 'blocker' and all the WR's default to 'receiver'....then have the option to change if you want
+1 but I really don't see why they added tagging to these positions to begin with
merenoise
offline
offline
Originally posted by Thunder66
Originally posted by MileHighShoes
I was just about to make a suggestion about this because tagging for two games was making my finger hurt.
+1
I just came here to suggest this myself.
It would be nice to have a "Tag All Selected" option with a drop down menu of all relevant tags, and Boolean/check box next to each player (so you can select the ones you want), that way it could be opened up to all positions not just WR/Oline (some people may have very basic tags and just want to tag all HB's as rushers etc).
That would be sweet, adding it to the OP.
Originally posted by MileHighShoes
I was just about to make a suggestion about this because tagging for two games was making my finger hurt.
+1
I just came here to suggest this myself.
It would be nice to have a "Tag All Selected" option with a drop down menu of all relevant tags, and Boolean/check box next to each player (so you can select the ones you want), that way it could be opened up to all positions not just WR/Oline (some people may have very basic tags and just want to tag all HB's as rushers etc).
That would be sweet, adding it to the OP.
Denthor
offline
offline
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
<---- Refuses to +1 anything that helps the 'D', even if it makes sense.
+1.
I'm okay with this, but have found it pretty useless; until GLB provides play specific O-Line adjustments.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4775479
<---- Refuses to +1 anything that helps the 'D', even if it makes sense.
+1.
I'm okay with this, but have found it pretty useless; until GLB provides play specific O-Line adjustments.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4775479
CDZYO
offline
offline
Originally posted by regnac
+1 but I really don't see why they added tagging to these positions to begin with
Originally posted by Denthor
I'm okay with this, but have found it pretty useless; until GLB provides play specific O-Line adjustments.
Most teams don't carry three blocking TEs, so the GL formation was ripe for OOP TEs. Wasn't a big deal because they didn't do anything but block. With the addition of the two Big formations (I & Singleback), the OOP TE could be a WR or scat FB... and OOP isn't a big deal if the guy is wide open for a pass. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1869388&pbp_id=691663
+1 but I really don't see why they added tagging to these positions to begin with
Originally posted by Denthor
I'm okay with this, but have found it pretty useless; until GLB provides play specific O-Line adjustments.
Most teams don't carry three blocking TEs, so the GL formation was ripe for OOP TEs. Wasn't a big deal because they didn't do anything but block. With the addition of the two Big formations (I & Singleback), the OOP TE could be a WR or scat FB... and OOP isn't a big deal if the guy is wide open for a pass. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1869388&pbp_id=691663
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.