User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Catch22
We didn't use any user submitted plays for the new formations. If we did, it was purely by accident (meaning we created a play that was also submitted by a user).


Why on earth would you ask users to submit plays, and then use none of them?
 
Thunder66
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Thunder66
Originally posted by Catch22
We didn't use any user submitted plays for the new formations. If we did, it was purely by accident (meaning we created a play that was also submitted by a user).


Why not?


Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Why on earth would you ask users to submit plays, and then use none of them?


Hey yo Catch, hey yo Catch, hey yo Catch... you've been online for a while now bigboy, want to tackle this one?
 
Bane
Baconologist
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Catch22
We didn't use any user submitted plays for the new formations. If we did, it was purely by accident (meaning we created a play that was also submitted by a user).


that is like the disclaimer that you read or hear at end of TV shows and movies

the bolded part is is that admitting an act of plagiarism ?



ETA
my disclaimer: just messing around, I realize it was just poorly written statement and there is no wrong doing
Edited by Behn on Oct 15, 2011 14:29:15
Edited by Behn on Oct 15, 2011 14:28:53
 
Stray Doug
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Catch22
We didn't use any user submitted plays for the new formations. If we did, it was purely by accident (meaning we created a play that was also submitted by a user).


Understood... would still like to see the old thread though...
 
tricon
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Why on earth would you ask users to submit plays, and then use none of them?


To gauge interest of-course

Why else?

Tricon
 
Antonine
offline
Link
 
Are these going to be available for us to use in pre-season?
 
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Why on earth would you ask users to submit plays, and then use none of them?


Why use them if they SUCK?
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TrevJo
Originally posted by Cruzi

4 WRs and 1 HB?

4 WRs and 1 TE?

Both?



Originally posted by PING72

Will there be some way to put 3 CB's on the left side w/o having to use 'cover man' on a CB originally set-up on the right side?

Not only is that more confusing to new coordinators, but the default DB location is not a good location.
 
yello1
Preacher
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PING72
Will there be some way to put 3 CB's on the left side w/o having to use 'cover man' on a CB originally set-up on the right side?

Not only is that more confusing to new coordinators, but the default DB location is not a good location.


Really?

Why not?

Where SHOULD they be positioned?
 
SlashNDash
DASHING
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Antonine
Are these going to be available for us to use in pre-season?


It would be nice to have an answer to that one...
 
buckets99
offline
Link
 
OH GOD I HATE CHANGE IM RESETTING TIME TO MAKE GLB THE SSAME AS IT WAS.
 
Dr. Showtime
DANG
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SlashNDash
It would be nice to have an answer to that one...


yes, they always have been when they add new plays
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Would be awesome if the 4WR formation is 4WRs and 1 FB
 
AngryDragon
offline
Link
 
Have little things such as tagging and the DPC been adjusted for these new formations? Since there are currently custom slots named TE1 and TE2 how will the TEs be identified to not conflict? Also, creating DPC plays for the trips formation might be tricky for newbs. I assume old school DCs should have no problems visualizing where the CB will end up.
 
OttawaShane
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TrevJo
Would be awesome if the 4WR formation is 4WRs and 1 FB


We've always had 4WR formation, only instead of it being an FB, the extra player has been a WR. Very crafty.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.