Darkstrand
offline
offline
honestly the 13-0 team should just be happy they dont' play in a tougher league for their level. They have NO future as as a successful team. You really do have to be terrible to lose to CPUs.
Karate_Koala
offline
offline
deleted
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 14:53:27
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 01:41:48
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 01:41:25
TrevJo
offline
offline
I suppose Catch22 is going to blame Macau's tactics for the forced fumble on the opening kickoff which set the tone for the game.
Karate_Koala
offline
offline
deleted
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 14:53:04
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 13:36:56
Mr. Me2
offline
offline
Originally posted by johny_jordan
15 Games, 428 Hurries, 123 Sacks, 33 Interceptions, 35 Defensive Touchdowns
129.1 Passing Yards Per Game Average, -7.1 Rushing Yards Per Game Average
But, more importantly, it frees up my safeties to make plays and get hurries on the QB. I know that's taboo for most defenses in this game, but the fact is, the rest of my guys cover well enough and my safeties get to the QB before it becomes a problem. (And, if they don't, it's because a lineman got there first.)
The safeties on my team have accounted for 69 TFLs, 48 Hurries, 33 Sacks. And, considering that I don't blitz them every play, I think those numbers are pretty effective.
Within those 15 games, I've been burned twice on a play where the ROLB covers a WR, both by CPU teams. It's effective over 90% of the time.
But, thanks for your input.
Oh, so your justification for that is doing it in the minors, and some stats against CPU and under-leveled teams? And the blowout adjusted stats are? Try that in WL, then get back to me. You are obviously new to this.
15 Games, 428 Hurries, 123 Sacks, 33 Interceptions, 35 Defensive Touchdowns
129.1 Passing Yards Per Game Average, -7.1 Rushing Yards Per Game Average
But, more importantly, it frees up my safeties to make plays and get hurries on the QB. I know that's taboo for most defenses in this game, but the fact is, the rest of my guys cover well enough and my safeties get to the QB before it becomes a problem. (And, if they don't, it's because a lineman got there first.)
The safeties on my team have accounted for 69 TFLs, 48 Hurries, 33 Sacks. And, considering that I don't blitz them every play, I think those numbers are pretty effective.
Within those 15 games, I've been burned twice on a play where the ROLB covers a WR, both by CPU teams. It's effective over 90% of the time.
But, thanks for your input.
Oh, so your justification for that is doing it in the minors, and some stats against CPU and under-leveled teams? And the blowout adjusted stats are? Try that in WL, then get back to me. You are obviously new to this.
Karate_Koala
offline
offline
deleted
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 14:52:45
Edited by johny_jordan on Feb 18, 2011 14:03:48
Mr. Me2
offline
offline
Like I said, it won't happen in against upper level or equal teams. And if you are referring to the team you are listed as dc for, then that is also to my point of under-levelled competition, not the LB.
And people run outside because it works. But lol at safeties tackling better. Again, not in upper levels against equal competition.
Hell, I'd LOVE for a team equal to us to try that against us. Unless you have an LB with 150+ speed, don't bother.
And people run outside because it works. But lol at safeties tackling better. Again, not in upper levels against equal competition.
Hell, I'd LOVE for a team equal to us to try that against us. Unless you have an LB with 150+ speed, don't bother.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
