User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Rookie Leagues > Rookie League #7 Rankings
Page:
 
Knowles 5
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by GabeGrimley
Hey, Death Scorpions, you suck.

Sorry to call you out, but I think this thread needs some action. I haven't heard of you before, so I chose you.


Very original haha
 
moentrol
-missing link-
offline
Link
 
everyone stopped talking about rome and it got boring. Today we face tilburg who is a pretty solid team.
 
RyanReese
offline
Link
 
rome & tilburg both suck
 
moentrol
-missing link-
offline
Link
 
ahhh the infamous ryan reese who just won't learn that his team has no chance at winning the season. Its ok you'll have a chance next season.....maybe.
 
Knowles 5
offline
Link
 
Well Rome have fun next game vs the defeated warriors. time to pad the stats a lot!
 
moentrol
-missing link-
offline
Link
 
yeah it would be nice if the coaches would let us throw the ball a little more in this next one..........
 
moentrol
-missing link-
offline
Link
 
updated
 
Coach_Schaar
offline
Link
 
GG Savanna...I blew a new custom D in your game...Enjoy the extra stats you got on those WIDE OPEN WRs! 1st season as DC and just learned a valuable lesson!
 
Link
 
Rome has the best CB duo in the league baby
 
gfd6600
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by AsomughaShutDown
Rome has the best CB duo in the league baby


Maybe in the West

I would put wong guy and scott best from The Matrix
against

lr cb1 and delonge anytime, especially since the Matrix guys are 2 levels lower than the other 2 and stats are very comparable.

The only stats they are way ahead on are targets
Duo stats
tackles:
matrix 88
rome 72

miss tackles

matrix 8
rome 9
tfl's
matrix 2
rome 7
tgt's
matrix 82
rome 157
rec alw
matrix 25
rome 46
pd's
matrix 41
rome 54

plays per game
matrix 82.6
rome 106.9

Not trying to smack talk anyone but stats wise, as far as amount played compared to stats, i would have to go with The Matrix.

 
RyanReese
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by moentrol
ahhh the infamous ryan reese who just won't learn that his team has no chance at winning the season. Its ok you'll have a chance next season.....maybe.


um my team is 8-4 & just smashed the nerfs who had the same record, we only have 2 evenly matched teams to face before playoffs so we will be there. super chargers & matrix better watch out cuz we coming for u & whoever wins the west is going down
 
Link
 
Originally posted by gfd6600
Maybe in the West

I would put wong guy and scott best from The Matrix
against

lr cb1 and delonge anytime, especially since the Matrix guys are 2 levels lower than the other 2 and stats are very comparable.

The only stats they are way ahead on are targets
Duo stats
tackles:
matrix 88
rome 72

miss tackles

matrix 8
rome 9
tfl's
matrix 2
rome 7
tgt's
matrix 82
rome 157
rec alw
matrix 25
rome 46
pd's
matrix 41
rome 54

plays per game
matrix 82.6
rome 106.9

Not trying to smack talk anyone but stats wise, as far as amount played compared to stats, i would have to go with The Matrix.



stats are worthless in this case. they play in a joke of a conference
 
GabeGrimley
offline
Link
 
Dane Cook
Steve Martin

of the Walker Wolves...

Tackles: 115 > both Rome and MATRIX
Missed Tackles: 3 > both Rome and MATRIX
TFLS: 4 > MATRIX, but this isn't indication of skill, just the type of defense that is run.
TGT: 185 > higher than both Rome and MATRIX
Rec Alw: (Full-season stats sheet says 0. Bug?) 63, or ~34% < both Rome and MATRIX
PDs: 37 < both Rome and MATRIX
 
GabeGrimley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RyanReese
um my team is 8-4 & just smashed the nerfs who had the same record, we only have 2 evenly matched teams to face before playoffs so we will be there. super chargers & matrix better watch out cuz we coming for u & whoever wins the west is going down


The Amsterdam Endorsements aren't gonna beat the SDSC or THE CAPS LOCK MATRIX, I'm sorry.
 
joe
46 Defense
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by AsomughaShutDown
stats are worthless in this case. they play in a joke of a conference


Wat??
Edited by joe on Feb 11, 2011 08:49:09
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.