Warrior General Games

Western conference 11 eastern conference 5

Nice work West.

Originally posted by ShowTyme
nice to see Nagasaki again. im in here with Jakarta Jesters.

crap man, you guys are CPU??

GG Traders

GG Bongers

Originally posted by riptide1977
GG Bongers

I have no idea why my team is in this league. My 54's can't hang with the 72's.

GG Bombers... that game was all about field position, and then we got the big return... sure we'll cross paths again

Originally posted by Redass Ranch
GG Bombers... that game was all about field position, and then we got the big return... sure we'll cross paths again

GG Storage.. I'm pretty sure we'll probably meet again.. Got some work to do..

Originally posted by drewsky
I have no idea why my team is in this league. My 54's can't hang with the 72's.

I just go with it at this point.. Someone will be saying the same thing in reverse in a couple season's.. At this point, when i see teams with players at level 64 and higher, I put it in the loss column, lol..

Originally posted by BobbyCox4Pres.
I just go with it at this point.. Someone will be saying the same thing in reverse in a couple season's.. At this point, when i see teams with players at level 64 and higher, I put it in the loss column, lol..

I still think grouping teams by effective levels rather than age is the better way to go. However I don't think members of GLB would ever be able to go through another switch over without losing their minds.

Originally posted by riptide1977
I still think grouping teams by effective levels rather than age is the better way to go. However I don't think members of GLB would ever be able to go through another switch over without losing their minds.

Really, with AEQ and even 4 levels up on a team, effective levels don't really matter.. Having both is a whoosh.. This sim is leaning now toward more percentages anyway, so yeah, levels in my opinion.. Even if players are 1 season behind of the 330 days old, with AEQ still make the games kinda competitive, as opposed to teams that our 1 season above this age with AEQ.. But at 330 age based, the players are still to young, so playing against the 1 season higher teams is fun to watch still.. I'm just saying that effective levels should have a lower impact on where a team is placed, and emphasize more on levels and age..

And GG Horde, I know you guys were out leveled by a ton but hold in there...

Originally posted by riptide1977
I still think grouping teams by effective levels rather than age is the better way to go. However I don't think members of GLB would ever be able to go through another switch over without losing their minds.

I'm kinda baffled actually after seeing the scores of your game against the Devils.. Almost same effective levels, but 1-2 sets of EQ and about an extra 35-40 SP's less plus VP's, etc..etc.. I'm not seeing eye to eye.. And I too, do not expect GLB to do anything about this.. So I just play to hope, lose and get older..

Originally posted by BobbyCox4Pres.
I'm kinda baffled actually after seeing the scores of your game against the Devils.. Almost same effective levels, but 1-2 sets of EQ and about an extra 35-40 SP's less plus VP's, etc..etc.. I'm not seeing eye to eye.. And I too, do not expect GLB to do anything about this.. So I just play to hope, lose and get older..

Game shocked me as well, I was expecting it to be a little closer, they had good game planning in the end and a loss is expected. In the grand scheme of things, there really is no good solution, so perhaps the age based leagues is the better option. There higher levels at QB make the difference I guess.

GG Bongers.. Looks like Jetnation and Rising sun devils both were yanked off the undefeated list..