Warrior General Games

Originally posted by KingCheez
Originally posted by Dub J

Why do you have such a problem with agents being able to opt out without owner's consent up to day 41? Why such a rush to lock in players on the same day many agents begin marketing their players? This is just a tool for shitty owners to put the screws to unaware agents.



Because the LOI has to have some sort of validity.

It's totally an optional thing, there's no screws to unaware agents. Bort could even have a pop-up that reminds the user after clicking 'Sign' post-32 that they will be bound to the team with contract release only being granted with owner approval.

this is so dumb

Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Because the LOI has to have some sort of validity.

It's totally an optional thing, there's no screws to unaware agents. Bort could even have a pop-up that reminds the user after clicking 'Sign' post-32 that they will be bound to the team with contract release only being granted with owner approval.
Apparently notices and pop ups don't help if you ask:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4542567&page=19#41291904

Originally posted by Dub J
Because you are locked in on day 32. A lot of shit can happen in one week. Day 32 is when a lot of people start shopping their players since their current team is out of the playoffs. I could maybe go along with it if agents had the ability to opt out up until day 41.

-1

Agree with Dub, make the Opt out option indefinite and I am ok. It is still a nice recruiting tool. But no reason to force player hands there.

Just think of a user committing a dot to a pro team that is doing very well. Then at day 40 suddenly he find himself in a team with empty roster (opps, the owner forgot to tell that they are replacing the roster since all the got dot go to their twin team).

this thing would make it harder for halifax to troll the rest of WL, which would clearly hurt the game as a whole.

Originally posted by TJ Spikes


necro bumped after 3 months and straight into voting

this voting system is awesome

.... in a "non" sort of way

lolsuggs

It'll be a disaster when a team doesn't get a promotion/loses a coordinator/gets demoted/loses key players/ etc. and all their "committed" agents bail for the teams with trophies. How does it tie into "team needs"?
I'd prefer a draft.
Work on some blocking/ LB zone read/sim stuff.....

+1

Make the opt out day 41 and I'd vote it.

Edited the OP to be a little more friendly towards the opt out part of the suggestion. It's ultimately the chiefs decision, but there's no reason imo to vote down a possible solid recruiting management tool due to a optional clause.

Cool, but the agent should always be able to opt out even without owner approval, all the way through day 40. No sense getting your dot stuck for seasons in advance when the team changes ownership, half guts, etc. I just don't see the value in requiring owner approval. This should be an agent tool, not an owner tool. Sending contracts isn't that difficult

Sounds like we are getting a little to real with the game.

lol at requiring owner approval to opt out.

-1 for reason stated above ^