Warrior General Games

Originally posted by HALL OF FAMER Al Davis
You misread something dude

So did you: the "I know you're not making this argument; you're just repeating an objection that you've seen other people make" part.

Sounds like we're all on the same side. Now we just need to all get on the same page.

But he wasn't repeating that objection, ah whatever.

Originally posted by HALL OF FAMER Al Davis
But he wasn't repeating that objection, ah whatever.

All that Iiiii'm saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-yiiiiiiing... is give peeeace a chaaaaaaaaaance!

(That, and give my dots a "Tactics Sharing Option" too. )

(Oh, that, and let's get this shit up for a vote already, of course. )

John Lennon FTW

+1

Another thing this would help with is in identifying bugs. Many times plays are diagnosed partially but can't do anything until someone sees how tactics are set, which can only be done by the player. Being able to open for owner/OC/DC/GM/Bug-Mod would be an answer to this, allowing a player to choose if his tactics were viewable by some others.....

Good suggestion, imo.

+1

Good suggestion.

+1

So far in this thread, we have 24 +1 posts, with just a single -1 post.

Let's vote this bitch.

+1

it's stupid that we can't view their tactics IMO. Why hide it? The owners and coordinators are the one's who have to spend hours gameplanning, it would be nice to know who is following directions and who are not.

Originally posted by KCChiefsMan
+1

it's stupid that we can't view their tactics IMO. Why hide it? The owners and coordinators are the one's who have to spend hours gameplanning, it would be nice to know who is following directions and who are not.

Just to clarify, this Suggestion is not to just make all Tactics open. This Suggestion is to give agents a choice whether or not to have their Tactics open or hidden, just like they have the choice for their Builds to be open or hidden. Right now, agents don't have a choice: their Tactics are hidden, whether they want them to be or not.

The choice should belong to the Agent, not to the Team Owner. But right now, it doesn't belong to either one of them: it belongs to Bort, who chose hidden for everybody.

-1

-1
To me this or similar ideas been put forward by mostly owners and gm's, but this time it's coming from an agent, if I am not mistaken. Just like you have unreasonable agents, you also have unreasonable owners. I would hate to have my players moved to ST or benched, because I refuse to allow anyone to see my tactics. Communication is the key, just ask the players to set their tactics. If they don't, don't re-sign them.

Originally posted by sweettnt
-1
To me this or similar ideas been put forward by mostly owners and gm's, but this time it's coming from an agent, if I am not mistaken. Just like you have unreasonable agents, you also have unreasonable owners. I would hate to have my players moved to ST or benched, because I refuse to allow anyone to see my tactics. Communication is the key, just ask the players to set their tactics. If they don't, don't re-sign them.

This

Originally posted by sweettnt
-1
To me this or similar ideas been put forward by mostly owners and gm's, but this time it's coming from an agent, if I am not mistaken. Just like you have unreasonable agents, you also have unreasonable owners. I would hate to have my players moved to ST or benched, because I refuse to allow anyone to see my tactics. Communication is the key, just ask the players to set their tactics. If they don't, don't re-sign them.
Why would you refuse if you aren't intentionally doing something different from what the coordinator wants? In that case, you should be benched.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Why would you refuse if you aren't intentionally doing something different from what the coordinator wants? In that case, you should be benched.

I thought this was an option for each agent and they had a choice to open it or not?