User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Lol.... We go from number 5 in rushing to 18? Then 28 or so in passing to 6?.... I think your rankings may be a bit biased to what X team did the game before. (imo)
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD
Lol.... We go from number 5 in rushing to 18? Then 28 or so in passing to 6?.... I think your rankings may be a bit biased to what X team did the game before. (imo)

It intentionally "re-evaluates" each and every single game and applies a "correction" factor based on how good the team is currently that you have played even in the past, how well you did against them given what we now know about how good they really are, and such things like that.

So yes if your skills are related to not only the skill of the opponent you played against but also there ever evolving skills as well.
 
sois
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
16 ........ 0 - 4 ...... 20 (5 / 10) ...... 18 (13 / 12) ..... 0.812 .... Las Vegas Locomotives (0.416)
17 ........ 4 - 0 ...... 17 (23 / 17) .... 11 (20 / 15) ..... 0.250 .... Death Valley Dragons (0.401)

I think that is proof enough to say that W/L clearly doesn't have enough of an impact on these rankings.


We are awesome!
 
balla4life
offline
Link
 
wow SOS means WAY TOO MUCH in these rankings.
we were 0-3 and had played 3 teams that were undefeated at the time and were ranked 12th
now we won 4 straight and are now 4-3 and ranked 13th.
Doesnt that make a lot of sense???

*EDIT for DTD*
Edited by balla4life on Apr 20, 2010 21:02:01
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by balla4life
wow SOS means WAY TOO MUCH in these rankings.
we were 0-3 and had played 3 undefeated teams and were ranked 12th
now we won 4 straight and are now 4-3 and ranked 13th.
Doesnt that make a lot of sense???


Correction... 3 teams that were undefeated
 
balla4life
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by balla4life
wow SOS means WAY TOO MUCH in these rankings.
we were 0-3 and had played 3 teams that were undefeated at the time and were ranked 12th
now we won 4 straight and are now 4-3 and ranked 13th.
Doesnt that make a lot of sense???

*EDIT for DTD*


is that better for ya
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by balla4life
is that better for ya


 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by balla4life
wow SOS means WAY TOO MUCH in these rankings.

Maybe but I do know that 3 out of 4 times these rankings have picked the winners of the playoffs by placing the #1 team (2 of those 3 winners had losses but were rated better then the undefeated teams) based on demonstrated talent adjusted for the quality of opponents they have played against.

Besides, we all know that obliterating a crappy team means next to nothing about how good you are and that only the records against moderately decent to good teams have much meaning. And being a "crappy" team because you are just barely losing to undefeated teams probably means you are likely much better then some of the teams who have a few wins.

Also the schedule is important but not as much as you think. There are 7 factors all that have equal weighting and is based on the "best" of all the teams and your proximity to it.

Winning Record
Strength of Schedule
Points Scored vs Points Allowed
Passing Yards Made vs Pass Defense of Team Played
Passing Yards Allowed vs Pass Offense of Teams Played
Running Yards Made vs Run Defence of Teams Played
Running Yards Allowed vs Run Offence of Teams Played


All 8 are on a scale of 0 to 1.5 and are simply added together to figure out the rating. That number is the number in ()'s after the teams name.

It is possible to get over 1.5 in a category due to certain things like the best run defence team in the entire league allowing negative run yards total from all games combined would cause that rating to potential go higher then a 1.5 for that team and teams allowing negative total yards and such.

All that being said, I probably will adjust the rankings so that not all aspects of a team have even weighting. Things like winning should probably have more value then everything else so maybe moving it to a scale of 0 to 2.5 might be better or something.
Edited by Westwind on Apr 21, 2010 16:47:48
 
Westwind
offline
Link
 
Updated rankings for week 8
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Westwind
Updated rankings for week 8


Dropped 3 spots after beating two of the best teams in the league

Fuck Yar
 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Um... just wondering... is special teams not included in this because I know some of these games have been won and lost by special teams (I was involved in a game where our opponent missed 4 extra points... we won by 4 points. [not this league]).
 
fakie92
offline
Link
 
cribs must be masturbating big time these days
 
BBird40
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by fakie92
cribs must be masturbating big time these days


What about beating our meat?
 
PING72
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Greatest DTD
Originally posted by Westwind

Updated rankings for week 8


Dropped 3 spots after beating two of the best teams in the league

Fuck Yar


I think it put you right about where you should be
 
EatDaBeaver
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PING72
I think it put you right about where you should be


lol....
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.