Congratulations Rome for tanking the last game of the season to avoid the Wildcats.
jynxy
offline
offline
Originally posted by PING72
Any comment from the Charleston Clippers??
whats it got to do with us
you saying were an easy target
Any comment from the Charleston Clippers??
whats it got to do with us
you saying were an easy target
PING72
offline
offline
Originally posted by jynxy
Originally posted by PING72
Any comment from the Charleston Clippers??
whats it got to do with us
you saying were an easy target
I'm saying they lost on purpose so they could play you in the first round instead of Montpelier. Just wondering what you thought of that.
Originally posted by PING72
Any comment from the Charleston Clippers??
whats it got to do with us
you saying were an easy target
I'm saying they lost on purpose so they could play you in the first round instead of Montpelier. Just wondering what you thought of that.
Edited by PING72 on Mar 11, 2010 12:13:31
jynxy
offline
offline
Originally posted by PING72
I'm saying they lost on purpose so they could play you in the first round instead of Montpelier. Just wondering what you thought of that.
more fool them, i hope they forget to put their DC back in order
I'm saying they lost on purpose so they could play you in the first round instead of Montpelier. Just wondering what you thought of that.
more fool them, i hope they forget to put their DC back in order
Dony95
offline
offline
Never know..... On the Lumberjacks last year we lost last game of season to get 6th seed instead of getting 5th seed..... Plan worked out too got to conference championship like we planned! 
So it may or may not pan out for them!
So it may or may not pan out for them! jaybus
offline
offline
I dont feel that it is right to throw a game in order to get to play a different team. My opinion is that you have to beat everyone to be the best anyway. If your not the champion the rest does not matter. Good luck to all the playoff teams and lets have some close games. This was the toughest competition that i have had a privilege of playing. Hopefully see some of you next year
vrecksler
offline
offline
Yeah, no teams that I have been on would throw a game so unless one of the Rome people say otherwise, I will continue to assume they played to win. They may have underestimated their opponent and tried some things in anticipation of an easy W, or they just may be that bad as they fell apart down the stretch.
Edited by vrecksler on Mar 12, 2010 22:34:56
balla4life
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dony95
Never know..... On the Lumberjacks last year we lost last game of season to get 6th seed instead of getting 5th seed..... Plan worked out too got to conference championship like we planned! So it may or may not pan out for them!
this is actually true. we didnt want to play DTit in the 2nd round. instead we pulled off a couple upsets and lost to them in the conference championship. We still had to play them eventually, we just delayed when it would happnen. It seemed to work for us.
Never know..... On the Lumberjacks last year we lost last game of season to get 6th seed instead of getting 5th seed..... Plan worked out too got to conference championship like we planned!
So it may or may not pan out for them! this is actually true. we didnt want to play DTit in the 2nd round. instead we pulled off a couple upsets and lost to them in the conference championship. We still had to play them eventually, we just delayed when it would happnen. It seemed to work for us.
jynxy
offline
offline
Originally posted by vrecksler
Yeah, no teams that I have been on would throw a game so unless one of the Rome people say otherwise, I will continue to assume they played to win. They may have underestimated their opponent and tried some things in anticipation of an easy W, or they just may be that bad as they fell apart down the stretch.
have you watched the game ??
Yeah, no teams that I have been on would throw a game so unless one of the Rome people say otherwise, I will continue to assume they played to win. They may have underestimated their opponent and tried some things in anticipation of an easy W, or they just may be that bad as they fell apart down the stretch.
have you watched the game ??
vrecksler
offline
offline
Originally posted by jynxy
have you watched the game ??
No. But unless they used 1 play on O and 1 play on D, I am giving them the benefit of the doubt that they were trying some things. IMO there is a difference between deciding to intentionally throw a game, and using a game for testing/tweaking.
have you watched the game ??
No. But unless they used 1 play on O and 1 play on D, I am giving them the benefit of the doubt that they were trying some things. IMO there is a difference between deciding to intentionally throw a game, and using a game for testing/tweaking.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
