LOLatU
Jamie52Jones
offline
offline
Originally posted by iStatic
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
Wave305
offline
offline
Now now children, there's always next year. Never let yesterday's disappointments overshadow tomorrows dreams.
Jamie52Jones
offline
offline
Originally posted by Wave305
Now now children, there's always next year. Never let yesterday's disappointments overshadow tomorrows dreams.
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Now now children, there's always next year. Never let yesterday's disappointments overshadow tomorrows dreams.
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Wave305
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Recently, no. But during most of the regular season I would say so.
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Recently, no. But during most of the regular season I would say so.
Miro031
offline
offline
Originally posted by Wave305
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Recently, no. But during most of the regular season I would say so.
Id agree.
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
I really cant wait till next season, =][= =][=, I'm hoping many of the same owners come back, bc even though we fight, we do it to better each others. We have to have to most active PeeWee forum around, am I right?
Recently, no. But during most of the regular season I would say so.
Id agree.
iStatic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
Originally posted by iStatic
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
Like they said, Whoever boosts more wins more.. its sad but in PeeWee its pretty much all true.
Originally posted by iStatic
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
Like they said, Whoever boosts more wins more.. its sad but in PeeWee its pretty much all true.
Miro031
offline
offline
Originally posted by iStatic
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
Originally posted by iStatic
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
Like they said, Whoever boosts more wins more.. its sad but in PeeWee its pretty much all true.
Its true in all leagues.
Originally posted by Jamie52Jones
Originally posted by iStatic
LOLatU
LOLatU for having an actually good AI and losing by the same dividend as us, who had a f**ked up AI, hahaha
Like they said, Whoever boosts more wins more.. its sad but in PeeWee its pretty much all true.
Its true in all leagues.
EatDaBeaver
offline
offline
both of us could have had much better gameplans vs the chargers, the boosting helped... but its not entirely true.
Wave305
offline
offline
Boosting players does help in a huge way and its also not one of the main purposes of a loss. I have a HB, level 22. It was full off level 22's, in a scrim against 17's and 18's. We lost in an upsetting 72-3. Its the plays you do, and the D you have set. If you think one thing, and it doesn't work its not because of the team boosting (lol). If you have a team that blitz all the time(13's) vs a team who passes all the time(10's), you can guess the outcome of that one. The passing obviously wins.
Edited by Wave305 on Jan 17, 2010 13:13:28
Miro031
offline
offline
No its not THE determining factor. Its just a part of the whole equation. AI and builds are the biggest factor. Excellent builds at a lower level can absolutely beat lesser builds at a higher level with good AI. Alot depends on the teams and situations as well.
For instance, two teams with excellent builds, excellent game planning and AI, get to the playoffs and one team dont boost....THEN boosting becomes a bigger factor. It all depends.
Also, if you are on a team other than pee wee (Minors, Casual, etc etc) and the team isnt boosting....that team isnt going to be competitive for very long. They will be out leveled heavily within a few seasons....if the team is hanging onto the same group of players/agents. But here again, you arent going to be competitive without good builds, anyhow.
And btw, when i say competitive I mean compete for a championship. Not just make the playoffs or have a winning record.
Boosting is a must in GLB if you want to continually be competitive, especially after the last few major changes the past few seasons.
For instance, two teams with excellent builds, excellent game planning and AI, get to the playoffs and one team dont boost....THEN boosting becomes a bigger factor. It all depends.
Also, if you are on a team other than pee wee (Minors, Casual, etc etc) and the team isnt boosting....that team isnt going to be competitive for very long. They will be out leveled heavily within a few seasons....if the team is hanging onto the same group of players/agents. But here again, you arent going to be competitive without good builds, anyhow.
And btw, when i say competitive I mean compete for a championship. Not just make the playoffs or have a winning record.
Boosting is a must in GLB if you want to continually be competitive, especially after the last few major changes the past few seasons.
Edited by Miro031 on Jan 17, 2010 13:19:25
Edited by Miro031 on Jan 17, 2010 13:18:58
Edited by Miro031 on Jan 17, 2010 13:18:03
Edited by Miro031 on Jan 17, 2010 13:15:42
iStatic
offline
offline
Originally posted by Wave305
Boosting players does help in a huge way and its also not one of the main purposes of a loss. I have a HB, level 22. It was full off level 22's, in a scrim against 17's and 18's. We lost in an upsetting 72-3. Its the plays you do, and the D you have set. If you think one thing, and it doesn't work its not because of the team boosting (lol). If you have a team that blitz all the time(13's) vs a team who passes all the time(10's), you can guess the outcome of that one. The passing obviously wins.
Actually, our AI was just fine, the fact that your players had 3 levels on our players is what gave you the 14 points, and with Cougars, same thing. We had no trouble demolishing every team that was the same level as us, but when there is that much of a difference... it happens. Cougars/Glads are the better teams, and if we boosted ALL, you do know we could have beaten the Chargers, I mean i could have boosted all.. but its a waste of flex if you dont keep the players. =]
Boosting players does help in a huge way and its also not one of the main purposes of a loss. I have a HB, level 22. It was full off level 22's, in a scrim against 17's and 18's. We lost in an upsetting 72-3. Its the plays you do, and the D you have set. If you think one thing, and it doesn't work its not because of the team boosting (lol). If you have a team that blitz all the time(13's) vs a team who passes all the time(10's), you can guess the outcome of that one. The passing obviously wins.
Actually, our AI was just fine, the fact that your players had 3 levels on our players is what gave you the 14 points, and with Cougars, same thing. We had no trouble demolishing every team that was the same level as us, but when there is that much of a difference... it happens. Cougars/Glads are the better teams, and if we boosted ALL, you do know we could have beaten the Chargers, I mean i could have boosted all.. but its a waste of flex if you dont keep the players. =]
Wave305
offline
offline
Originally posted by iStatic
Actually, our AI was just fine, the fact that your players had 3 levels on our players is what gave you the 14 points, and with Cougars, same thing. We had no trouble demolishing every team that was the same level as us, but when there is that much of a difference... it happens. Cougars/Glads are the better teams, and if we boosted ALL, you do know we could have beaten the Chargers, I mean i could have boosted all.. but its a waste of flex if you dont keep the players. =]
If I recall the match-up I saw against the Cougars and you, when it ended 19-7, the cougars had a better passing and rushing game, and a better blocking game. Plus a few boosted players that boosted in the beginning actually. Yet, you guys still one due to an AI set I'm pretty sure.
Actually, our AI was just fine, the fact that your players had 3 levels on our players is what gave you the 14 points, and with Cougars, same thing. We had no trouble demolishing every team that was the same level as us, but when there is that much of a difference... it happens. Cougars/Glads are the better teams, and if we boosted ALL, you do know we could have beaten the Chargers, I mean i could have boosted all.. but its a waste of flex if you dont keep the players. =]
If I recall the match-up I saw against the Cougars and you, when it ended 19-7, the cougars had a better passing and rushing game, and a better blocking game. Plus a few boosted players that boosted in the beginning actually. Yet, you guys still one due to an AI set I'm pretty sure.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
