i think a couple Eugene players are gonna surprise everybody hopefully I'll be one
baseball52
offline
offline
Originally posted by salizy13
watch out for Sean Sweeney
led the West in Tds last season
I'll give you a couple footballs for him.
watch out for Sean Sweeney
led the West in Tds last season
I'll give you a couple footballs for him.
BullFrogOnNet
offline
offline
Originally posted by baseball52
League MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Offensive MVP
Tuffy Beastwich/ Fernando Brady
East Offensive MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Cody Glenn
East Defensive MVP
Vontaze Burflict
West Rookie
Gerry Rice
East Rookie
Aragorn Elessar
Most Improved Player
(biased)Brady Lead
pahleeze you can't have a "rookie category" for players moving down to pwn lower levels. if we were in A, AA, AAA, or Pro and someone came from a lower league i could see that being a valid category. throw that junk out or change it to "Ringers".
League MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Offensive MVP
Tuffy Beastwich/ Fernando Brady
East Offensive MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Cody Glenn
East Defensive MVP
Vontaze Burflict
West Rookie
Gerry Rice
East Rookie
Aragorn Elessar
Most Improved Player
(biased)Brady Lead
pahleeze you can't have a "rookie category" for players moving down to pwn lower levels. if we were in A, AA, AAA, or Pro and someone came from a lower league i could see that being a valid category. throw that junk out or change it to "Ringers".
Last edited Jun 11, 2008 12:11:45
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
Originally posted by baseball52
League MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Offensive MVP
Tuffy Beastwich/ Fernando Brady
East Offensive MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Cody Glenn
East Defensive MVP
Vontaze Burflict
West Rookie
Gerry Rice
East Rookie
Aragorn Elessar
Most Improved Player
(biased)Brady Lead
pahleeze you can't have a "rookie category" for players moving down to pwn lower levels. if we were in A, AA, AAA, or Pro and someone came from a lower league i could see that being a valid category. throw that junk out or change it to "Ringers".
New players to the league are considered rookies. If you wanted to change it to level 1-4's then that be fine but go ahead and pick one who does something in this league at that level.
Originally posted by baseball52
League MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Offensive MVP
Tuffy Beastwich/ Fernando Brady
East Offensive MVP
Aragorn Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Cody Glenn
East Defensive MVP
Vontaze Burflict
West Rookie
Gerry Rice
East Rookie
Aragorn Elessar
Most Improved Player
(biased)Brady Lead
pahleeze you can't have a "rookie category" for players moving down to pwn lower levels. if we were in A, AA, AAA, or Pro and someone came from a lower league i could see that being a valid category. throw that junk out or change it to "Ringers".
New players to the league are considered rookies. If you wanted to change it to level 1-4's then that be fine but go ahead and pick one who does something in this league at that level.
BullFrogOnNet
offline
offline
new players to the league are not considered rookies to me if they came from a higher league and 9 levels higher than our median. the rookie category should be thrown out. I for sure won't give credit or acknowledgement to that award. As for the other awards those make sense.
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
new players to the league are not considered rookies to me if they came from a higher league and 9 levels higher than our median. the rookie category should be thrown out. I for sure won't give credit or acknowledgement to that award. As for the other awards those make sense.
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
new players to the league are not considered rookies to me if they came from a higher league and 9 levels higher than our median. the rookie category should be thrown out. I for sure won't give credit or acknowledgement to that award. As for the other awards those make sense.
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
Bearphin
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unconquered
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
new players to the league are not considered rookies to me if they came from a higher league and 9 levels higher than our median. the rookie category should be thrown out. I for sure won't give credit or acknowledgement to that award. As for the other awards those make sense.
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
I think it should only be first season on GLB. Just throwing that out there.
Originally posted by BullFrogOnNet
new players to the league are not considered rookies to me if they came from a higher league and 9 levels higher than our median. the rookie category should be thrown out. I for sure won't give credit or acknowledgement to that award. As for the other awards those make sense.
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
I think it should only be first season on GLB. Just throwing that out there.
Unconquered
offline
offline
I think both points can be argued but one will make little sense. Who wants to look thorugh the few (if any) level 4's in this league and see who actually had somewhat of an impact? I personally think to the league should be the standard because hypothetically if Adrian Peterson was a GLB player he wouldn't be a level 4 competing against level 15-20's. Just my two cents though.
Bearphin
offline
offline
Well new guys don't stay level 4 forever. Most of my team started out around lvl 4, but they are all up there by now.
Any who here is my list for this.
League MVP
Awesome Lee
West Offensive MVP
Los Yoyo
East Offensive MVP
Marcus Plouzek
West Defensive MVP
Bryan Lacher
East Defensive MVP
Cago Eman
West Rookie
derek styles
East Rookie
Mosey Dotes
Most Improved Player
Rob Halford
Any who here is my list for this.
League MVP
Awesome Lee
West Offensive MVP
Los Yoyo
East Offensive MVP
Marcus Plouzek
West Defensive MVP
Bryan Lacher
East Defensive MVP
Cago Eman
West Rookie
derek styles
East Rookie
Mosey Dotes
Most Improved Player
Rob Halford
salizy13
offline
offline
Heres mine for this year
League MVP
Awesome Lee
West Offensive MVP
Mike Juskiw
East Offensive MVP
Aragon Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Pig Bloater
East Defensive MVP
Petey Jones
West Rookie
Juan Ortiz
East Rookie
Mosey Dotes
Most Improved Player
Dylan Salisbury
League MVP
Awesome Lee
West Offensive MVP
Mike Juskiw
East Offensive MVP
Aragon Elessar
West Defensive MVP
Pig Bloater
East Defensive MVP
Petey Jones
West Rookie
Juan Ortiz
East Rookie
Mosey Dotes
Most Improved Player
Dylan Salisbury
Last edited Jun 12, 2008 01:33:51
DizMojo
offline
offline
Wow, hehe no nods for Deion, even with his league leading 10 picks, is everyone scared? hehe but best of luck to all teams
Lgonzo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unconquered
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
The median is posted somewhere in the GLB Forum. I believe it is "unofficial", but it's there. Anyways I agree bullfrog, you can't say a player (I would imagine one of the better ones too) coming down from pro is rookie of the year. It may not be a very good analogy but thats like sending a 3rd yr pro to play in college, not to mention it wouldnt be any college, it would be an already stacked college who should have won it all last year.
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
The median is posted somewhere in the GLB Forum. I believe it is "unofficial", but it's there. Anyways I agree bullfrog, you can't say a player (I would imagine one of the better ones too) coming down from pro is rookie of the year. It may not be a very good analogy but thats like sending a 3rd yr pro to play in college, not to mention it wouldnt be any college, it would be an already stacked college who should have won it all last year.
Unconquered
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lgonzo
Originally posted by Unconquered
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
The median is posted somewhere in the GLB Forum. I believe it is "unofficial", but it's there. Anyways I agree bullfrog, you can't say a player (I would imagine one of the better ones too) coming down from pro is rookie of the year. It may not be a very good analogy but thats like sending a 3rd yr pro to play in college, not to mention it wouldnt be any college, it would be an already stacked college who should have won it all last year.
Now leave your biased aside and attempt to bring a logical argument on how we should do it. Also I know their is a link, I posted it. That was for the off-season...
Originally posted by Unconquered
Where did you get the median was 11? I haven't seen it posted anywhere. I'm almost positive maybe in the off-season it "could" be 11 but I doubt even that. I know the medium certainly has to be changing, multiple teams in this league have been boosting so if anything it should be much higher. I don't think someone's level should really determine if they are rookie of the year rather if they are either
A) First season on GLB
B) Rookie to the league
That should be the only two factors considered and it should be one or the other.
The median is posted somewhere in the GLB Forum. I believe it is "unofficial", but it's there. Anyways I agree bullfrog, you can't say a player (I would imagine one of the better ones too) coming down from pro is rookie of the year. It may not be a very good analogy but thats like sending a 3rd yr pro to play in college, not to mention it wouldnt be any college, it would be an already stacked college who should have won it all last year.
Now leave your biased aside and attempt to bring a logical argument on how we should do it. Also I know their is a link, I posted it. That was for the off-season...
Lgonzo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unconquered
Now leave your biased aside and attempt to bring a logical argument on how we should do it. Also I know their is a link, I posted it. That was for the off-season...
Bias on what? I own a middle of the pack team that wont have any players winning rookie of the year/mvp/and whatever else is up there. It doesnt affect me at all.
I would just scrap the award all together. If you really want it there then call it something else, "First Year BBB Player" for all I care; just don't call it ROY.
Now leave your biased aside and attempt to bring a logical argument on how we should do it. Also I know their is a link, I posted it. That was for the off-season...
Bias on what? I own a middle of the pack team that wont have any players winning rookie of the year/mvp/and whatever else is up there. It doesnt affect me at all.
I would just scrap the award all together. If you really want it there then call it something else, "First Year BBB Player" for all I care; just don't call it ROY.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
