Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Get speed to 61
Get vision to 61
Get agility to 61
in that order while training speed/agility... then agility/vision

For a FS... the next is tackling then some stamina

For a SS... the next is tackling then some stamina with strength

Differentiate your safety from then on.

This, if you want a shitty Safety.

61 for strength and tackling, get them both to the soft cap first (maybe even after you get your first two primaries to 68, get str/tck soft capped). confidence you can train for a while, same with stamina and jumping.. you can cap any of them you want first, it's just a personal choice. some would second cap confidence and forget stamina and jumping, some would take strength or tackling to 68 before capping any of the rest. there's no one way that's always ideal no matter what.

Originally posted by UnderDogs
Originally posted by Challenge Everything

Get speed to 61
Get vision to 61
Get agility to 61
in that order while training speed/agility... then agility/vision

For a FS... the next is tackling then some stamina

For a SS... the next is tackling then some stamina with strength

Differentiate your safety from then on.

This, if you want a shitty Safety.

Incorrect

OMG...

Train Speed and Agility
1) Cap Speed
Train Agility and Vision
2) Second Cap Speed
3) Third Cap Speed
4) Cap Agility
Train Vision and Jumping
5) Second Cap Agility
6) Third Cap Agility
7) Cap Vision
Train Jumping and Tackling
8) Second Cap Vision
9) Third Cap Vision
10) Cap Jumping

That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.

Originally posted by Hate Sighed
That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.
I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles.

Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Originally posted by Hate Sighed

That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.
I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles.

that's not a good metric for determining the success of a build.

Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Originally posted by Hate Sighed

That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.
I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles.

They are only lv. 32.

What happened to your older guys? Bad builds you retired?

Originally posted by RAPB
Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Originally posted by Hate Sighed
That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles. They are only lv. 32.What happened to your older guys? Bad builds you retired?
Good build based on season 1 info... retired for flex.

Originally posted by Darren McFadden
Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Originally posted by Hate Sighed
That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles. that's not a good metric for determining the success of a build.
Very true however the DC has utilized them and they have performed well. Bad builds don't perform well.

Originally posted by Challenge Everything
Originally posted by Darren McFadden

Originally posted by Challenge Everything

Originally posted by Hate Sighed

That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles. that's not a good metric for determining the success of a build.
Very true however the DC has utilized them and they have performed well. Bad builds don't perform well.

It's a question of WHEN you like your guys to perform well. Rounding a build does a lot for stats - but at the same time you give up the small advantages you'll really need later on. You obviously found a sweet spot for mid-30s guys - but will they continue to play outstanding at lv. 55? We'll see!

Thanks for all the help dudes.

Intense training speed and agility right now. Once I get it to the first i'll train agility and vision, while saving points to 2nd cap speed

Also it's, well, slow. Can't wait for some real games to start next season

Originally posted by Phantom2k4
Thanks for all the help dudes.

Intense training speed and agility right now. Once I get it to the first i'll train agility and vision, while saving points to 2nd cap speed

Also it's, well, slow. Can't wait for some real games to start next season

i HATE long offseasons

Originally posted by RAPB
Originally posted by Challenge Everything

Originally posted by Darren McFadden


Originally posted by Challenge Everything


Originally posted by Hate Sighed


That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles. that's not a good metric for determining the success of a build.
Very true however the DC has utilized them and they have performed well. Bad builds don't perform well.

It's a question of WHEN you like your guys to perform well. Rounding a build does a lot for stats - but at the same time you give up the small advantages you'll really need later on. You obviously found a sweet spot for mid-30s guys - but will they continue to play outstanding at lv. 55? We'll see!

this guy will be better at lvl 55 than your lvl 30 61/61/61 guy (referring to challenge!)
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1400704

However, for FS I would go with vision next instead of tackling with this SS.

Originally posted by RAPB
Originally posted by Challenge Everything

Originally posted by Darren McFadden


Originally posted by Challenge Everything


Originally posted by Hate Sighed


That'll get you started...you can 61:61:61 if you want but long term your player will fail.I disagree. I have come to realize that the DC makes much more of a difference in how effective and how to utilize a safety.

My two current safeties are both 61's and they lead the team in tackles. that's not a good metric for determining the success of a build.
Very true however the DC has utilized them and they have performed well. Bad builds don't perform well.

It's a question of WHEN you like your guys to perform well. Rounding a build does a lot for stats - but at the same time you give up the small advantages you'll really need later on. You obviously found a sweet spot for mid-30s guys - but will they continue to play outstanding at lv. 55? We'll see!

I'll agree with this, although after around level 40-45 when most peoples' builds fill out, I'd say that's when the game gets most interesting--secondary stats can come into play, and builds can really differentiate around this point. Good players in my opinion will try to suit team needs.

However, without a good core build, I definitely think a player is a liability to the rest of the team because he won't be efficient enough to do what is expected of him. Simple, really.

Originally posted by misled
this guy will be better at lvl 55 than your lvl 30 61/61/61 guy (referring to challenge!)
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1400704

However, for FS I would go with vision next instead of tackling with this SS.
I would hope so. A level 55 player will always be better than a level 30.

I don't think anyone would deny that.

I also don't understand your use of the word "better". Better how? More effective? More versatile? Better stats? Better how? I would go as far as to say each could be equally effective and equal in respect to the game... the difference will come from how the DC chooses to use them. Will either be a liability? I don't think so but to use the term "better" is quite vague and really does not conclude anything in a concrete manner.