Warrior General Games

bringin it up now tom

No reason not to do it.

+1, should go into epic.

..

That's dope. Soooo unlike RL.

As an owner and a gm I would agree with making a player trade approval part of the no trade clause cuz that is how it is done in real life. Plus now its still one option, if the player doesn't want to go he doesn't have to, and if there comes a situation where you want to trade someone with the no trade you don't have to go through signing the new contract. I know it's not a big deal to do that but still.

this topic will stay bumped.

I'm telling you it was your husband who-Listen. Please listen. He must have thought Stud was the name a man like that would-I don't know why he-Ask him. Ask him.

Originally posted by oldskool
Just change no trade to this, it's more logical. Nobody in their right mind would "really" offer or agree to a contract that neither party could feasibly get out of.

Here's the problem...you can always breach a contract, except in GLB.

Which is why this is a good idea >.>

Originally posted by Azure Dreams
Which is why this is a good idea >.>

I agree.

Good.

Me too.

you are.

the only one who needs to know.

oh hey look over there

Originally posted by oldskool
Just change no trade to this, it's more logical. Nobody in their right mind would "really" offer or agree to a contract that neither party could feasibly get out of.

Yes. The original suggestion brings up a valid point, and this change needs to be made.

That's fine too. Don't really care, tbh. I guess the only benefit a no-trade would have as opposed to this would be that people wouldn't be able to offer for players you don't want them to with the no-trade and would with the player option.