Warrior General Games

The 'announcement ' sounds like this is a done deal already, with decisions already made. Why not have a thread like this before decisions are handed down? Why wasn't EQ mentioned on the Super Sunday Poll, if nothing else, before implementing major changes. To me, as someone who started in season 11 (which according to some here means I don't get a voice), this is another example of something that's only a problem for the top 25% of leagues yet the fix applies to the bottom 75% unnecessarily. Wouldn't it be much easier just to have EQ decline like players--the longer you have it the less effective it is! That's actually even realistic (unlike visors that make you jump higher)--shit wears out, it breaks. Make it less effective for level 40 and up players without penalizing or confusing things for younger or newer players. I don't think anyone complains about AEQ in Cap 26 where my first player plays.

PS I read a lot of these things to learn, and this might be the first time I didn't agree with Deathblade on something--he usually seems to 'have the back' of the common player, but here is looks like he's defending this as his personal crusade.. Was it this your idea, Deathblade?

EDIT: Oh, and I also wanted to point out that it makes me wonder, of all the things that could be fixed in the game, why something like this is a priority.

Originally posted by Deathblade
You can't make changes that have no impact on anything, DUCY?

Not quite what I said, but your response was expected.

I didnt say "no impact", and moreover, you know I didnt...

Originally posted by ib_mr_ed
Maybe we could make a new league were we can have all the crazy stacks and exploits. Like the old Robot Football game for the NES. The one where you could blow up the other team and crazy shit like that.

Lancer1997 could be the commish and run the show.

what if Bort just took like a handful of us over to another server and made one league where he changed a huge aspect of the game each week and we had to adapt to all the changes until everyone in the league was satisfied with the end product?

Originally posted by Hate Sighed
Right, which is why a change is necessary!

Wrong. The change enables even greater CC builds, as every major sweeping change done does.

Originally posted by fogie55
The 'announcement ' sounds like this is a done deal already, with decisions already made. Why not have a thread like this before decisions are handed down?

Because it is a done deal, the decision is already made, and letting a lot of bitching affect the development of the sim has been hurting the game forever now.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Not quite what I said, but your response was expected.

I didnt say "no impact", and moreover, you know I didnt...

So it is either

A). Make stronger players weaker
B). Make weaker players weaker
C). No change

Originally posted by Deathblade
PS: Stop with the fucking retarded analogy of salary, you weren't a fucking scholar because you made a speed/agility DE

Its only retarded if you dont understand it. However given this response, you clearly do, and realize my point is right. Thanks for confirming.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
May not be the object but its certainly going to be the result.

Right now you must do several things in any successful build. And most builders do it in a certain order.

Yes, and once you select your archetype the way you build your player won't change one bit.

Have to say that I disagree.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Wrong. The change enables even greater CC builds, as every major sweeping change done does.

O_o

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Originally posted by Hate Sighed

Right, which is why a change is necessary!

Wrong. The change enables even greater CC builds, as every major sweeping change done does.

Wronger. This change will fix every problem with the sim and allow a billion and one different viable build combinations.

I can make retarded sweeping claims with no basis in reality too

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Its only retarded if you dont understand it. However given this response, you clearly do, and realize my point is right. Thanks for confirming.

It's retarded because you are comparing salary to a video game.

Originally posted by SpringfieldSkins
Yes, and once you select your archetype the way you build your player won't change one bit.

Have to say that I disagree.

I did appreciate the archetype, found that to be a refreshing change. Figured that the game was evolving. This just leads me to be believe that assessment was wrong and nothing has changed.

Make no mistake, when one archetype is more successful than others it too will be cut off at the knees.

Originally posted by Deathblade
So it is either

A). Make stronger players weaker
B). Make weaker players weaker
C). No change

It's truly unfathomable how worthless your contributions to this thread have been.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
I did appreciate the archetype, found that to be a refreshing change. Figured that the game was evolving. This just leads me to be believe that assessment was wrong and nothing has changed.

Make no mistake, when one archetype is more successful than others it too will be cut off at the knees.

I'm curious, how many of your players even have stacked % AEQ?

Originally posted by ICRockets
It's truly unfathomable how worthless your contributions to this thread have been.

Let me redeem myself then.

"WTF BORT THIS CHANGE IS TERRIBLE I HATE THIS GAME I HATE YOU I AM GOING TO QUIT WTF"