Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
25 Tokens seems like major overkill. I also think that swapping for similar SAs can be exploited, depending on what the pairings are. Does +% PD = SDC SA?
Overall I think the change is okay as SAs were becoming far less valuable at higher levels.
Overall I think the change is okay as SAs were becoming far less valuable at higher levels.
britdevine316
offline
offline
This is retarded.
Don't hurt % AEQ, fix the freakin SA's so they actually do something
Don't hurt % AEQ, fix the freakin SA's so they actually do something
Edited by britdevine316 on Feb 13, 2010 20:22:13
Catch22
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
25 Tokens seems like major overkill. I also think that swapping for similar SAs can be exploited, depending on what the pairings are. Does +% PD = SDC SA?
Overall I think the change is okay as SAs were becoming far less valuable at higher levels.
No +% PD will not = SDC. The available list will make sense and not be over powered. We figured it was better to do overkill and give people plenty of options since this is a pretty big change to AEQ.
25 Tokens seems like major overkill. I also think that swapping for similar SAs can be exploited, depending on what the pairings are. Does +% PD = SDC SA?
Overall I think the change is okay as SAs were becoming far less valuable at higher levels.
No +% PD will not = SDC. The available list will make sense and not be over powered. We figured it was better to do overkill and give people plenty of options since this is a pretty big change to AEQ.
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by britdevine316
This is retarded.
Don't hurt % AEQ, fix the freakin SA's so they actually do something
Actually in the works...
Still doesn't stop +75% stacking from being ridiculous.
This is retarded.
Don't hurt % AEQ, fix the freakin SA's so they actually do something
Actually in the works...
Still doesn't stop +75% stacking from being ridiculous.
ICRockets
offline
offline
For Christ's sake, would you people just let us build the dots we want? What was the justification behind this?
britdevine316
offline
offline
Originally posted by Deathblade
Actually in the works...
Still doesn't stop +75% stacking from being ridiculous.
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
Actually in the works...
Still doesn't stop +75% stacking from being ridiculous.
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
Originally posted by ICRockets
For Christ's sake, would you people just let us build the dots we want? What was the justification behind this?
I'm guessing that players with stacking EQ were too rigged. In particular, HBs that stacked 2-3 AEQ pieces of +% break tackle and LBs with +% FF might have been a bit overpowered.
For Christ's sake, would you people just let us build the dots we want? What was the justification behind this?
I'm guessing that players with stacking EQ were too rigged. In particular, HBs that stacked 2-3 AEQ pieces of +% break tackle and LBs with +% FF might have been a bit overpowered.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Bummer since some of my guys have a % stack, but it does make sense to put some limitations. Hell, just be glad it's half as effective instead of not being allowed at all.
Dpride59
offline
offline
Originally posted by britdevine316
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
The fuck it does. The only cookie cut going on amongst all top teams is stacked %.
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
The fuck it does. The only cookie cut going on amongst all top teams is stacked %.
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by britdevine316
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
Think about what you are saying here.
If it is only counterable by the counter EQ, then builds are already cookie-cutter.
(and they were, anyone who tries to deny that +75% break tackle was comparable to any other combination is either ignorant or lying to themselves0
Not when everyone can stack a counter. % EQ is one of the ways to be different out there building a player. This just promotes more cookie cutter builds
Think about what you are saying here.
If it is only counterable by the counter EQ, then builds are already cookie-cutter.
(and they were, anyone who tries to deny that +75% break tackle was comparable to any other combination is either ignorant or lying to themselves0
Catch22
offline
offline
Originally posted by sgsemu
When will this be available for swapping?
Will be this off season.
As DB said, I'm also going to be working on SA balance testing and we're going to be adjusting SA's to be more effective/less effective depending on how they are working.
When will this be available for swapping?
Will be this off season.
As DB said, I'm also going to be working on SA balance testing and we're going to be adjusting SA's to be more effective/less effective depending on how they are working.
Dpride59
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Bummer since some of my guys have a % stack, but it does make sense to put some limitations. Hell, just be glad it's half as effective instead of not being allowed at all.
This.
Also makes our argument about linebackers and adv equipment a total no brainer. Might be better off never even going adv equipment on linebackers now
Bummer since some of my guys have a % stack, but it does make sense to put some limitations. Hell, just be glad it's half as effective instead of not being allowed at all.
This.
Also makes our argument about linebackers and adv equipment a total no brainer. Might be better off never even going adv equipment on linebackers now
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
