Warrior General Games

Originally posted by beenlurken
I still have yet to have anyone answer why we cant just be limited to one % AEQ piece (no stacking of same % piece) except instead of a 2% gain between upgrades we would ge a 3%. Forces players to try and find that 5% piece and to upgrade it to a high level to be effective. Also forces them to try other AEQ options.

I kinda like this idea. It would simplify things and make stacking irrelevant. Make them so the best piece could be powered up to say 30%?

Originally posted by Hate Sighed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PBvOxicz-0

im still holding out hope for those kinds of graphics in GLB...but dots with legs and arms...

Originally posted by SpringfieldSkins
I think this change was probably proactive and for the better.

Those that do that will do it no matter what. IF they did this or not..

Originally posted by SpringfieldSkins
Some of the changes have been made to make the game a little more "fair" (for lack of a better term).

DE's were improved for a bit, then nerfed because they were getting 2-3 sacks a game on a good team and now I think they have found a decent medium.

There's apparently a problem with the % chance. If this change wasn't made, then people would probably start threads in GLB main crying about the unfairness of it after everyone caught on. I think this change was probably proactive and for the better.

Regarding "fair"...horse manure. I make a decent living, does that mean half my salary should go to my secretary? I mean thatd be "fair". In context of this game however, if you ttake away something that works all you do is benefit those who dont build well at the expense of those that do.

If everyone is destined to have the same builds, why not just make all builds the same, lock em down, and then people could just watch the SIMS instead of building, a la the Brute game...

Originally posted by Deathblade
omg it's dooley in his prime >_>

i especially liked the 10 yard perimeter spin move.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Way to avoid the question.

I give you a gold star in incompetence.

Give me whatever you liked, I answered directly and succinctly - you just didn't like my response...

Originally posted by beenlurken
I still have yet to have anyone answer why we cant just be limited to one % AEQ piece (no stacking of same % piece) except instead of a 2% gain between upgrades we would ge a 3%. Forces players to try and find that 5% piece and to upgrade it to a high level to be effective. Also forces them to try other AEQ options.

My thought is that they still wanted % stacking to still exist but not give the player such a benefit. Basically to make it so that if you wanted a super high %, you still could but at the detriment of other AEQ pieces.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Regarding "fair"...horse manure. I make a decent living, does that mean half my salary should go to my secretary? I mean thatd be "fair". In context of this game however, if you ttake away something that works all you do is benefit those who dont build well at the expense of those that do.

If everyone is destined to have the same builds, why not just make all builds the same, lock em down, and then people could just watch the SIMS instead of building, a la the Brute game...

God you fail so fucking hard : /

Take your whiny DE and go retire or something.

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Regarding "fair"...horse manure. I make a decent living, does that mean half my salary should go to my secretary? I mean thatd be "fair". In context of this game however, if you ttake away something that works all you do is benefit those who dont build well at the expense of those that do.

If everyone is destined to have the same builds, why not just make all builds the same, lock em down, and then people could just watch the SIMS instead of building, a la the Brute game...



so its just good building to stack a bunch of % AEQ's together?

Originally posted by ken-in-rockwall
Those that do that will do it no matter what. IF they did this or not..

This is true. Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

Originally posted by Deathblade
God you fail so fucking hard : /

Take your whiny DE and go retire or something.

Using "fail" on the internet...O lordie...that proves my 2nd post on here at least...

Originally posted by Hate Sighed
I think the opposite is what we are seeing here. We've waited too long to make the overhaul changes to business as usual.
This is true, can't argue that.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Probably...but honestly, they aren't THAT huge of changes. It's not like we are adding a dozen new attributes with cryptic descriptions and changing the number of players on the field to 17 per team.

I would argue that the archetype's are a pretty big change.

Originally posted by SpringfieldSkins
My thought is that they still wanted % stacking to still exist but not give the player such a benefit. Basically to make it so that if you wanted a super high %, you still could but at the detriment of other AEQ pieces.

Because that's a choice. Right now, the %AEQ is so overpowered that it's not a choice. Archetypes and %AEQ nerf lead to more diverse options when building your dots, not cookie cutter. What's difficult to comprehend about this?

Originally posted by Lancer1997
Give me whatever you liked, I answered directly and succinctly - you just didn't like my response...

Me: "You don't want change"
You: "I want change, just don't want strong players effected"
Me: "So the change should hurt underpowered players?"
You: "Dwight Freeney didn't lose speed HARHAR!"

Originally posted by Deathblade
God you fail so fucking hard : /

Take your whiny DE and go retire or something.

I just want to thank both of you for REALLY GIVING ME A GREAT NIGHT OF ENTERTAINMENT!!! This is better than watching a movie.