what the hell does pass distance % do anyways
Triple_A
offline
offline
Will the rolling change for AEQ, for example, a better chance at getting the best AEQ needed at that postion?
jamz
offline
offline
Originally posted by SpringfieldSkins
I didn't know that there was such an uproar about stacking AEQ. If this was done to prevent future problems with people griping about it, very good work.
I stack my SA AEQ. Hopefully this doesn't get applied to that sooner or later.
SA's already had diminishing returns, %AEQ didn't.
They're in a more similar boat now.
I didn't know that there was such an uproar about stacking AEQ. If this was done to prevent future problems with people griping about it, very good work.
I stack my SA AEQ. Hopefully this doesn't get applied to that sooner or later.
SA's already had diminishing returns, %AEQ didn't.
They're in a more similar boat now.
Deathblade
offline
offline
Originally posted by adrianpeterson69
Originally posted by jesusmp2000
Originally posted by britdevine316
This is retarded.
no u
Originally posted by jesusmp2000
Originally posted by britdevine316
This is retarded.
no u
ShadowWolf
offline
offline
Originally posted by Maddoc
I'm pretty sure you actually can't have +3 Speed/+5% Break Block
I have a +1 speed/5% and was just taking it to the extreme.
I'm pretty sure you actually can't have +3 Speed/+5% Break Block
I have a +1 speed/5% and was just taking it to the extreme.
jamz
offline
offline
Originally posted by Triple_A
Will the rolling change for AEQ, for example, a better chance at getting the best AEQ needed at that postion?
The system was changed not too long ago, with that in mind. It's gotten pretty easy to get the good pieces, if you roll a little while.
Far easier than the original system.
Will the rolling change for AEQ, for example, a better chance at getting the best AEQ needed at that postion?
The system was changed not too long ago, with that in mind. It's gotten pretty easy to get the good pieces, if you roll a little while.
Far easier than the original system.
Lancer1997
offline
offline
This is beyond dumb. Can someone explain to me why GLB takes things that work and abolishes them?
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Originally posted by ICRockets
Just know that I reserve the right to say "I told you so" when the elimination of AEQ stacking kills the passing game and results in a grand total of 0 WL DEs with 10+ sacks in a season (assuming no guts/cupcakes).
My point is that this change is nothing if not hasty. Yes, the results will be excellent for nerfing HBs. But there has to be a way to nerf them without killing QB Pass Quality and DL Effectiveness.
http://i47.tinypic.com/23trp1w.jpg
Just know that I reserve the right to say "I told you so" when the elimination of AEQ stacking kills the passing game and results in a grand total of 0 WL DEs with 10+ sacks in a season (assuming no guts/cupcakes).
My point is that this change is nothing if not hasty. Yes, the results will be excellent for nerfing HBs. But there has to be a way to nerf them without killing QB Pass Quality and DL Effectiveness.
http://i47.tinypic.com/23trp1w.jpg
SpringfieldSkins
offline
offline
Originally posted by jamz
SA's already had diminishing returns, %AEQ didn't.
They're in a more similar boat now.
Yeah, I realize that, and from what I've heard anything from 7-11 is about as high as you want to take it. With SA AEQ, you can take a SA from 3 to 11 without having to spend all of those extra SP invested. Something like SDC, Juke or Spin for example.
As long as they don't change that, I'm happy.
SA's already had diminishing returns, %AEQ didn't.
They're in a more similar boat now.
Yeah, I realize that, and from what I've heard anything from 7-11 is about as high as you want to take it. With SA AEQ, you can take a SA from 3 to 11 without having to spend all of those extra SP invested. Something like SDC, Juke or Spin for example.
As long as they don't change that, I'm happy.
Edited by SpringfieldSkins on Feb 13, 2010 22:35:16
Hate Sighed
offline
offline
Originally posted by Iowannarock
lame
Compelling, I'm sure Bort will reconsider now.
lame
Compelling, I'm sure Bort will reconsider now.
Originally posted by Lancer1997
This is beyond dumb. Can someone explain to me why GLB takes things that work and abolishes them?
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
Where's DB and his red herring link?
This is beyond dumb. Can someone explain to me why GLB takes things that work and abolishes them?
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
Where's DB and his red herring link?
Lancer1997
offline
offline
Originally posted by CaptainUniverse
Where's DB and his red herring link?
Been around since season 1. I wont be creating anymore players nor adding anymore money into the game. May mean nothing to Bort, or most of you, but for myself, I am one person who has been disenfranchised to the point where I dont think Im going to do it anymore.
Where's DB and his red herring link?
Been around since season 1. I wont be creating anymore players nor adding anymore money into the game. May mean nothing to Bort, or most of you, but for myself, I am one person who has been disenfranchised to the point where I dont think Im going to do it anymore.
Hate Sighed
offline
offline
Originally posted by CaptainUniverse
Where's DB and his red herring link?
Originally posted by Lancer1997
This is beyond dumb. Can someone explain to me why GLB takes things that work and abolishes them?
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
Are you being intentionally daft?
Where's DB and his red herring link?
Originally posted by Lancer1997
This is beyond dumb. Can someone explain to me why GLB takes things that work and abolishes them?
People should be reacting and countering with their own equipment, to trends developing. +% break tackle could be countered by +% make tackle.
Instead, all GLB does is promote Cookie cutter builds. Season over season it is amazing to watch. And BEYOND frustrating....
Are you being intentionally daft?Hate Sighed
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lancer1997
Been around since season 1. I wont be creating anymore players nor adding anymore money into the game. May mean nothing to Bort, or most of you, but for myself, I am one person who has been disenfranchised to the point where I dont think Im going to do it anymore.
You'll be missed.
Been around since season 1. I wont be creating anymore players nor adding anymore money into the game. May mean nothing to Bort, or most of you, but for myself, I am one person who has been disenfranchised to the point where I dont think Im going to do it anymore.
You'll be missed.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
