Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jamz
At the end of the day, realize this... this change was made for build diversity reasons

If you didn't stack 3 pieces of Break Tackle as a RB, you were behind the curve. Break Block for a Dliner guy.

There shouldn't be 1 right way to buy AEQ, same reason attribute VAs were changed.

There needs to be multiple options for each character enhancement, or whats the point of having different options?

If you are upset by the changes, We might as well all start with 3 - 5% pieces and get rid of tokens all together.

This.

Originally posted by David Stern
You're right. Bort would have just stealth nerfed the % gave you 0 shopping tokens back, and acted like it never happened.

STFU.. Troll !!!

Originally posted by P@nda
Are you as stupid as the NBA Commish?

No. You're just not smart enough to understand the role sp's level 1-20 plays on the end game build.

30 SP level 1-20=/= 30 sp at level 65. Sorry sally

Better question is why would you ever take +3 Speed over BB% even after the diminishing returns tbh

Originally posted by OneGiantLeap
Reposting this just because I can since the useless moderator jc made me read through 6 pages of thread to find my answer instead of simply TELLING ME. Great customer support there for a paying customer.

Buy me a boat so I don't drown in your fucking sea of tears.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Well, same SA stacks suffer from diminishing returns (SAs over 10 suffer), but yeah no change to these.

is this true?

Originally posted by taurran
It doesn't change the fact that there's always going to be a "best" way to do something.

Nerfing something every time it's deemed the "best" isn't going to solve a whole lot in the long run.

This was my point Stern....

Originally posted by jamz
At the end of the day, realize this... this change was made for build diversity reasons

If you didn't stack 3 pieces of Break Tackle as a RB, you were behind the curve. Break Block for a Dliner guy.

There shouldn't be 1 right way to buy AEQ, same reason attribute VAs were changed.

There needs to be multiple options for each character enhancement, or whats the point of having different options?

If you are upset by the changes, We might as well all start with 3 - 5% pieces and get rid of tokens all together.

Couldn't have said it better.

Originally posted by OneGiantLeap
And if not, I think that disadvantages me against players who may have bought equipment like +3 Speed, 5% Break bock. Could I potentially get +3 speed, to make up for my break block? Or will I be forced to not get any SA's since I was already lucky enough to get SA/% piece equipment?
You can't currently get +attribute, +% break block, so you're not disadvantaged. I suspect that break block will be given some kind of attribute value since you can't translate +% break block, +SA into just +SA.

Originally posted by Tim26
is this true?

Yeah...SAs over 10 have always had diminishing returns.

Originally posted by Tim26
is this true?

Has been for a long time.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Have you played GLB lately? Averaging over a sack per game is unbelievable for a DE given the way pass blocking is coded. But his impact on the run game is actually where things stand out. Try watching any of our games and see him knocking down 1-3 linemen per play.

Ok, but can you explain to me how nerfing him along with the overpowered HBs is going to change the balance at all? Will you be ok with them going for 200+ yards a game as long as they only do it with +23% break tackle?

Originally posted by Deathblade
Yeah...SAs over 10 have always had diminishing returns.

so 10 SA is better than 11 SA or 11 is like the same as 10?

Originally posted by David Stern
Originally posted by P@nda

Are you as stupid as the NBA Commish?

No. You're just not smart enough to understand the role sp's level 1-20 plays on the end game build.

30 SP level 1-20=/= 30 sp at level 65. Sorry sally

Wow thanks for the Maff lesson.

Originally posted by P@nda
Originally posted by taurran

It doesn't change the fact that there's always going to be a "best" way to do something.

Nerfing something every time it's deemed the "best" isn't going to solve a whole lot in the long run.

This was my point Stern....

PROTIP: % AEQ is still going to be the best

the only difference is now it might not be a completely retarded idea to get a different % or even an SA for your second or third piece.