Wr too slow probably. Why isnt he behind everyone? Fix your build Wise
Forum > Champion League > S105: GG / Smack Talk Thread
Kenshinzen
offline
offline
Don’t know what Playfakers is talking above, must be mad with something posting 4️⃣ in a row but must admit he got two important wins (especially against SWAT).
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
The cream has risen to the top as you scrubs predicted. KC and Canes only remaining. RIP rest of you jokers.
Novus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Don’t know what Playfakers is talking above, must be mad with something posting 4️⃣ in a row but must admit he got two important wins (especially against SWAT).
Nah, he's actually in a pretty good mood, but don't worry, you're not missing much.
Don’t know what Playfakers is talking above, must be mad with something posting 4️⃣ in a row but must admit he got two important wins (especially against SWAT).
Nah, he's actually in a pretty good mood, but don't worry, you're not missing much.
WiSeIVIaN
offline
offline
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
Wr too slow probably. Why isnt he behind everyone? Fix your build Wise
Obviously I blame the tiny chemistry difference!
Wr too slow probably. Why isnt he behind everyone? Fix your build Wise
Obviously I blame the tiny chemistry difference!
PLAYMAKERS
offline
offline
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Obviously I blame the tiny chemistry difference!
Oh yes great point! he will be fine
Obviously I blame the tiny chemistry difference!
Oh yes great point! he will be fine
King of Bling
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Okay, so I'm bad at this whole passing thing (points to sig), but I'm watching the Sno-Fla game, and so far I've learned that throwing lots of long passes against Cover-3 and Quarter defensive plays leads to... (checks notes)... lots of interceptions? Am I interpreting that correctly?
Top-notch coverage schemes + superior builds = opposition disaster. Best case opponent outcome: specialized planning to get 50/50 shot.
Just sayin'
BTW, I'm all for things tightening up as it makes for exciting CL Playoff match-ups
Okay, so I'm bad at this whole passing thing (points to sig), but I'm watching the Sno-Fla game, and so far I've learned that throwing lots of long passes against Cover-3 and Quarter defensive plays leads to... (checks notes)... lots of interceptions? Am I interpreting that correctly?
Top-notch coverage schemes + superior builds = opposition disaster. Best case opponent outcome: specialized planning to get 50/50 shot.
Just sayin'
BTW, I'm all for things tightening up as it makes for exciting CL Playoff match-ups
WiSeIVIaN
offline
offline
Originally posted by Novus
Okay, so I'm bad at this whole passing thing (points to sig), but I'm watching the Sno-Fla game, and so far I've learned that throwing lots of long passes against Cover-3 and Quarter defensive plays leads to... (checks notes)... lots of interceptions? Am I interpreting that correctly?
Nov it's easy to be a critic, but I do not imagine any offense you have ever ran would be seeing much success against Florida. It is not quite as simple as coverage schemes.
Also noting deep INT's on 3rd down (for those that were) aren't much different than an incompletion+punt.
My goal is to make the WL playoffs, then figure out how to spike 2 games against RC somehow.
Okay, so I'm bad at this whole passing thing (points to sig), but I'm watching the Sno-Fla game, and so far I've learned that throwing lots of long passes against Cover-3 and Quarter defensive plays leads to... (checks notes)... lots of interceptions? Am I interpreting that correctly?
Nov it's easy to be a critic, but I do not imagine any offense you have ever ran would be seeing much success against Florida. It is not quite as simple as coverage schemes.
Also noting deep INT's on 3rd down (for those that were) aren't much different than an incompletion+punt.
My goal is to make the WL playoffs, then figure out how to spike 2 games against RC somehow.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.