Warrior General Games

Originally posted by gbororats

my suggestion would liven up the game a lot more before making it crash hard is speeding up the build processes so more poeple build teams, more competition, but then everyones flex will run out way faster cycling through flex faster. It will either get more people to buy flex when they run low, or cause people to quit playing when they run out. Either way its worth a shot, but again, NGTH

Exactly, but then come the guys "What about the minor leagues?" It's the main reason guys are quitting this game, the dot building process is just to long...

Originally posted by Tomcic
Exactly, but then come the guys "What about the minor leagues?" It's the main reason guys are quitting this game, the dot building process is just to long...

Training 7 to get 5 is what sucks, I think everybody "enjoys" the build process but the payoff isnt the best. If it was flipped like 5 for 7 that would be nice....

Originally posted by .spider.
Training 7 to get 5 is what sucks, I think everybody "enjoys" the build process but the payoff isnt the best. If it was flipped like 5 for 7 that would be nice....

Agreed. It takes way too long to build it up and then with decline you have teams ditching the 440s and even some 400s to get 280s due to the chem hits when they all hit 480.

It would help if decline wouldn't start until 560 but I digress.

Another problem is that people are not wanting to buy more flex if this game is dying and nothing is going to be put into it. Recruiting is a nightmare.

Originally posted by refguru
Agreed. It takes way too long to build it up and then with decline you have teams ditching the 440s and even some 400s to get 280s due to the chem hits when they all hit 480.

It would help if decline wouldn't start until 560 but I digress.

Another problem is that people are not wanting to buy more flex if this game is dying and nothing is going to be put into it. Recruiting is a nightmare.

It's a good thing you are in love with CPU dots

Originally posted by .spider.
feels good man

As does chem resets

Plus I dont really see cash as an issue here. Just need one off-season to fill bank up. We drained Oakland 2 seasons ago, and now already have 70 millions again for this season.

Its not like they are suddently gonna add stuff for GLB anyway and give us price-money, even if super-logical

Originally posted by .spider.
I see your point....i guess I've never asked after making 20ish moves, but I always assumed they wouldnt do it just cuz you asked.

I dont really think anyone asking for it after just 20 moves either, seems like a bad chem-loss there, since usually its 10 offense and 10 defense if losing like 20, so O and D close to 100 anyway by day 2.

Originally posted by Krille820
I dont really think anyone asking for it after just 20 moves either, seems like a bad chem-loss there, since usually its 10 offense and 10 defense if losing like 20, so O and D close to 100 anyway by day 2.

more like d -6 with 16 offseason days if you can get most of the guys signed initially

Originally posted by gbororats
more like d -6 with 16 offseason days if you can get most of the guys signed initially


Yes I meant losing 20 dots, not 20 chem, read swenglish, bork bork bork.

Originally posted by Krille820
I dont really think anyone asking for it after just 20 moves either, seems like a bad chem-loss there, since usually its 10 offense and 10 defense if losing like 20, so O and D close to 100 anyway by day 2.

It would be day 5 back to 100 for O and D IF, and that's a pretty big IF everybody signed on day 42, 20 dots and if they all sign on day 42 you'd be at 60/80/80

Which is what I thought, why would anyone ask for a reset in that range....the ones asking for the reset I would assume are signing 30+ dots....

Come on Bort, come off the cash and flex and hook up the teams who are doing things the right way.

Originally posted by refguru
Come on Bort, come off the cash and flex and hook up the teams who are doing things the right way.

I'll bite, what's "the right way"?